I’ve read through the whole draft. Plenty of strong prose, plus a clear sediment of placeholder notes, untranslated Latvian quotes, and fragmentary one-liners — especially in the Conclusion and the Chapter 5 sections on modal/processual labour. Tagging now.

Tagged. Quick map of what’s flagged and why:

placeholder (notes-to-self, raw quote dumps, template stubs):

• SLM6T8 a quoted block draft not yet woven in

• BTMNVC bracketed reminder

• 8P4BJ8 ends “[..] [Statistics on Baltics…]”

• EKSMPT, JDHYA8, 3D89DU, K3J9L9 questions to self / brainstorm

• UMCGMV “(moral economies of access and restraint)” header note

• F595S6 “BURDEN” header

• DL635Z “Imperfections of the world.”

• HT6RNV “[No Singapūras pētījuma]” editorial note

• 3XQWKH long Mesiranta block-quote pasted in unintegrated

• VA8VPV, BE6T6R Tallinn template text for Summary / Kokkuvõte

needs_revision — Latvian, please translate : X2SDNW, AEVP7W, 98GUGE, VPK4HA, 5UGKZC, YFLJ5U, ZV985K, 2USKRS, ZRFACW, EWT5TA, UVS9NA, P76F2Q, 2FJ3E6

needs_revision — other obvious fixes :

• ULMUVH stray footnote marker “swapshop1” with no footnote

• J7U4SR and CAFCR8 duplicate the 40% / 55% statistics already in 2FNP5J

• 25T35D uncited generalisations about Baltic textile imports

• N275XP Kenya passage with stray “15”, orphan “(Ibid.)”, and arguably out of place in the Latvian-context section

• ZYUP5Q, WPGJPL the Berlin-comparison thread reads as notes that need to be stitched into prose

fragment (incomplete sentences or one-liners that don’t yet make an argument):

• §1.2: YXMJTH (“Access to infrastructure not distributed evenly.”)

• §5.3: WR6R4X, CARJKR, WML37C, LDP95V, H5QAHU, Y6UURX

• Conclusion: F3XQHG, E3N629, QENYUC (ends in comma), 2NMEE7, MEQ7PN, SNFMDG, DQX9VT, ZA6DWY, Y5F3R4, FSGHQU, 7RSGPZ

A note on the Conclusion S9GXZE: structurally it’s the section that needs the most surgery before submission — it has two competing endings and ~15 stray one-liners. Worth a dedicated pass once the chapter-level edits stabilise.