# Assistant conversation GKY9FG

- Canonical URL: <https://sheaf.less.rest/GKY9FG>
- Resource IRI: <https://sheaf.less.rest/GKY9FG>
- Type: assistant conversation
- Mode: quick

## Transcript

### 1. User

can you browse and read and get a sense of how the MIKAEL thesis draft differs from the other draft? give an overall description and then get specific

### 2. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `list_documents`

```json
{}
```

### 3. Tool result: list_documents

- #4V8VH7 Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] - 2026 | Ieva Lange
- #FYG32U Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [draft] - 2026 | Ieva Lange

Journal articles (91)
- #QUD55H 'Saving' the city: Collective low-budget organising and urban practice - 2015 | Birke Otto, Hans Vollmer, Heike Derwanz, Paula Bialski | ephemera: theory & politics in organization | 20 pp.
- #K52UPR A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafés in a Sustainable Circular Transition - 2021 | Mette Alberg Mosgaard, Rikke Marie Moalem | Sustainability | 26 pp. | doi:10.3390/su132212351
- #4EFC4F After Practice? Material Semiotic Approaches to Consumption and Economy [cited] - 2020 | David M. Evans | Cultural Sociology | 17 pp. | doi:10.1177/1749975520923521
- #9D34UM After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice - 2014 | Alan Warde | Journal of Consumer Culture | 25 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540514547828
- #5Y2AD9 An order of distinction (or, how to tell a collection from a hoard) - 2018 | Katie Kilroy-Marac | Journal of Material Culture | 19 pp. | doi:10.1177/1359183517729428
- #FQRNAE Austerity and everyday life: Perspectives on practices of consumption and thrift - 2019 | Alison Hulme | Journal of Consumer Culture | 7 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540519872079
- #9MNC8T Austerity Ireland, the New Thrift Culture and Sustainable Consumption - 2017 | Fiona Murphy | Journal of Business Anthropology | 17 pp. | doi:10.22439/jba.v6i2.5410
- #59QUM6 Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle [cited] - 2017 | Sally Eden | Journal of Consumer Culture | 21 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540515586871
- #X8QHRR Calculating the Environmental Impact Reduction Due to Extended Lifespan of Clothing Through Clothing Swaps - 2025 | Agnė Jučienė, Inga Gurauskienė, Jolita Kruopienė | Sustainability | 22 pp. | doi:10.3390/su17104411
- #AVNZLE Care and circularity: how the enactment of care enables and shapes the circular consumption of clothing [cited] - 2025 | Christian Fuentes, Réka Tölg | Consumption and Society | 19 pp. | doi:10.1332/27528499y2024d00000032
- #XUHRZA Changing understandings of waste reduction and avoidance in moralities of thrift: A comparison of Mass Observers' narratives three decades apart [cited] - 2022 | Helen Holmes, Ulrike Ehgartner | Geoforum | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.10.014
- #BQ2W57 Circular Consumption Practices as Matters of Care [cited] - 2025 | Elina Närvänen, Malla Mattila, Nina Mesiranta, Outi Koskinen | Journal of Business Ethics | 19 pp. | doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05888-5
- #57LWKZ Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research - 2020 | Emma R. Power, Miriam J. Williams | Geography Compass | 12 pp. | doi:10.1111/gec3.12474
- #JXXRQJ Citizen-Consumers as Agents of Change in Globalizing Modernity: The Case of Sustainable Consumption - 2010 | Gert Spaargaren, Peter Oosterveer | Sustainability | 22 pp. | doi:10.3390/su2071887
- #8ZKAT7 Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy - 2016 | Kersty Hobson | Progress in Human Geography | 17 pp. | doi:10.1177/0309132514566342
- #MCJT5Q Connecting the multi-level-perspective and social practice approach for sustainable transitions - 2022 | Léon Francis Hirt, Margit Keller, Marlyne Sahakian | Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions | 15 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.004
- #UB9EAT Consumer engagement in the circular economy: Exploring clothes swapping in emerging economies from a social practice perspective [cited] - 2019 | Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero | Sustainable Development | 16 pp. | doi:10.1002/sd.2002
- #Q3G2WY Consumption - 2011 | David Graeber | Current Anthropology | 24 pp. | doi:10.1086/660166
- #N7FUYP Consumption and Commodities - 1995 | D. Miller | Annual Review of Anthropology | 22 pp. | doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.24.1.141
- #RZ8QTE Consumption and Theories of Practice [cited] - 2005 | Alan Warde | Journal of Consumer Culture | 23 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540505053090
- #PSBVW7 Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review - 2018 | Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero | Sustainability | 25 pp. | doi:10.3390/su10082758
- #NUEUVY Consumption Work in the circular economy: A research agenda. [cited] - 2021 | Dan Welch, Harald Wieser, Helen Holmes, Katy Wheeler, Kersty Hobson | Journal of Cleaner Production | 8 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128969
- #MNFABA Disposal and simple living: exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption - 2009 | Hélène Cherrier | Journal of Consumer Behaviour | 14 pp. | doi:10.1002/cb.297
- #YBKS64 Everyday life after downshifting: Consumption, thrift, and inequality - 2020 | Jo Lindsay, Kim Humphery, Ruth Lane | Geographical Research | 15 pp. | doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12396
- #TBPJS6 Exploring the role of community-based enterprises in consumers' voluntary clothing disposition via UK swapping events using theory of social practice [cited] - 2023 | Aurelie Le Normand, Claudia E. Henninger, Lucie Počinková, Marta Blazquez Cano | Social Enterprise Journal | 21 pp. | doi:10.1108/sej-02-2023-0017
- #N5VYH8 Food practices as part of daily routines: A conceptual framework for analysing networks of practices - 2021 | Aricia F.M. Castelo, Martina Schäfer, Minelle E. Silva | Appetite | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104978
- #FHZZ6U Freecycling Markets as Sustainable Materialist Movements? Closing Reuse Circularity Loops in Singapore [cited] - 2024 | Brenda S.A. Yeoh, Qian Hui Tan | Worldwide Waste: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies | 15 pp. | doi:10.3197/whpww.63857928646673
- #SJ3K7R Friends, family and the circulation of used goods: overlooked sustainability practices - 2025 | Dharma Arunachalam, Jo Lindsay, Rob Raven, Ruth Lane | Environmental Sociology | 13 pp. | doi:10.1080/23251042.2025.2510410
- #4AE86F From circular consumers to carriers of (unsustainable) practices: socio-spatial transformations in the Circular City - 2020 | Kersty Hobson | Urban Geography | 5 pp. | doi:10.1080/02723638.2020.1786329
- #4UEQN8 Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? - 1997 | Gretchen M. Herrmann | American Ethnologist | 21 pp. | doi:10.1525/ae.1997.24.4.910
- #B6FWAN Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life [cited] - 2010 | Elizabeth Shove, Gordon Walker | Research Policy | 6 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
- #MRANHJ Grey greening: quiet sustainability at auto salvage yards - 2022 | Pavel Mašek | Geografie | 19 pp. | doi:10.37040/geografie2022127010055
- #MBXQXR Growing in Motion: The Circulation of Used Things on Second-hand Markets [cited] - 2015 | Anna Bohlin, Staffan Appelgren | Culture Unbound | 26 pp. | doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1571143
- #B3CVMW Harnessing the Unruly: Anthropological Contributions in Applied Reuse Projects - 2020 | Anna Bohlin, Staffan Appelgren | kritisk etnografi: Swedish Journal of Anthropology | 17 pp. | doi:10.33063/diva-432451
- #YW8AYL Home and the extended-self: Exploring associations between clutter and wellbeing - 2021 | Caroline J. Rogers, Dr Rona Hart | Journal of Environmental Psychology | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101553
- #ZB3YSD Household consumption at the crossroads: A bibliometric decoding of global sustainability trends, research gaps, and collaborative networks (2015-2025) - 2025 | B.K. Prahani, Hendry Cahyono, Iszan Hana Kaharudin, Kukuh Arisetyawan, Ladi Wajuba Perdini Fisabilillah, M. Satriawan, M.A. Ghofur, N. Suprapto, Ruth Eviana Hutabarat, S. Andari, Wenny Restikasari, Zain Fuadi Muhammad RoziqiFath | E3S Web of Conferences | 10 pp. | doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202564001017
- #UGBANU How temporal orientations trigger, nurture and sustain deep engagement with consumption practices - 2025 | Benjamin Rosenthal | Marketing Theory | 21 pp. | doi:10.1177/14705931241264535
- #9GQP2Z In Defense of Consumer Critique: Revisiting the Consumption Debates of the Twentieth Century - 2007 | Juliet B. Schor | The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science | 15 pp. | doi:10.1177/0002716206299145
- #4Y4DVC Incidental sustainability? Notes from a thrift store in Germany - 2023 | Petra Kuppinger | Critique of Anthropology | 20 pp. | doi:10.1177/0308275x231194259
- #XUS5YJ Learning like a Minimalist—Learning from a Minimalist. Consumers as Disseminators for Sustainable Clothes Usage - 2021 | Journal of Sustainability Research | 24 pp. | doi:10.20900/jsr20210017
- #QWH9YU Lifestyles of enough exploring sufficiency-oriented consumption behavior from a social practice theory perspective - 2023 | Maren I Kropfeld | Journal of Consumer Culture | 22 pp. | doi:10.1177/14695405221095008
- #VGCYKU Linking social practice theories to the perceptions of green consumption: An overview - 2025 | Samira Jabin, Shah Md Atiqul Haq | Social Sciences & Humanities Open | 12 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101455
- #R69WZQ Material culture and the circular economy - 2023 | Elizabeth Shove, Jenny Rinkinen | Frontiers in Sustainability | 4 pp. | doi:10.3389/frsus.2023.1158079
- #ARE7AL Materials changing the performance of the household energy consumption practices - 2025 | Eliisa Kylkilahti, Henna Syrjälä, Liisa Kääntä, Sara-Ellen Laitinen | Journal of Consumer Culture | 19 pp. | doi:10.1177/14695405251321405
- #FYWZFY My Journey within Practice-Based Approaches Bandwagon - 2019 | Mika Pantzar | Sociologica | 8 pp. | doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/10203
- #XATD2A New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning [cited] - 2018 | Helen Holmes | Geoforum | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.022
- #R9KEKQ Not moving things along: hoarding, clutter and other ambiguous matter - 2009 | Neil Maycroft | Journal of Consumer Behaviour | 12 pp. | doi:10.1002/cb.298
- #VJ8G58 Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life - 2015 | Elizabeth Shove, Jenny Rinkinen, Mikko Jalas | Sociology | 16 pp. | doi:10.1177/0038038515577910
- #CUWPC9 On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair &amp; Care - 2019 | Cindy Isenhour, Joshua Reno | Worldwide Waste | 8 pp. | doi:10.5334/wwwj.27
- #D8EAVV Online Clothing Resale: A Practice Theory Approach to Evaluate Sustainable Consumption Gains - 2020 | Cosette M. Joyner Armstrong, Hyejune Park | Journal of Sustainability Research | 24 pp. | doi:10.20900/jsr20200017
- #AG36RW Paradoxes of openness and distinction in the sharing economy - 2016 | Connor Fitzmaurice, Emilie Dubois Poteat, Juliet B. Schor, Lindsey B. Carfagna, Will Attwood-Charles | Poetics | 18 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2015.11.001
- #86EHHS Practice theory approach to Gen Z’s sustainable clothing consumption in Finland [cited] - 2024 | Olga Gurova | Young Consumers | 19 pp. | doi:10.1108/yc-06-2023-1765
- #XAYNBH Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change - 2011 | Tom Hargreaves | Journal of Consumer Culture | 21 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540510390500
- #WVG7HV Quiet sustainability: Fertile lessons from Europe’s productive gardeners [cited] - 2013 | Joe Smith, Petr Jehlicka | Journal of Rural Studies | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.002
- #4YG3VP Repair for a Broken Economy: Lessons for Circular Economy from an International Interview Study of Repairers - 2021 | Duncan McLaren, Johan Niskanen, Jonas Anshelm | Sustainability | 15 pp. | doi:10.3390/su13042316
- #AY4Z4C Repair Work as Care: On Maintaining the Planet in the Capitalocene - 2025 | Julia E. Corwin, Vinay Gidwani | Antipode | 21 pp. | doi:10.1111/anti.12791
- #V9QTJP Reuse practices and household consumption work [cited] - 2026 | David M. Evans, Peter Jackson, Rorie Beswick-Parsons | Social &amp; Cultural Geography | 21 pp. | doi:10.1080/14649365.2025.2549709
- #HJXUZN Selling Thrift: Work Practices in an American Thrift Store [cited] - 2023 | Frederik Larsen | Journal of Business Anthropology | 19 pp. | doi:10.22439/jba.v12i1.6914
- #ANC583 Social bases of material consumption: The relationship between social groups and possession of household appliances in Denmark - 2019 | Mette Hove Jacobsen | Journal of Consumer Culture | 20 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540516684190
- #NE9YL5 Sustainability as a Moral Discourse: Its Shifting Meanings, Exclusions, and Anxieties - 2022 | Al Lim, Lav Kanoi, Michael R. Dove, Shoko Yamada, Vanessa Koh | Sustainability | 17 pp. | doi:10.3390/su14053095
- #EPZXEW Sustainable Consumption and Practice Theories: Connecting Elements of Clothing Sharing - 2024 | Marcia de Freitas Duarte, Minelle E. Silva, Márcia R. Cavalcante Costa | BBR, Braz. Bus. Rev. | 25 pp. | doi:10.15728/bbr.2021.1182.en
- #5FD8BE The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field - 2019 | Filippo Corsini, Francesco Paolo Appio, Franziska Meinherz, Luca Mora, Rafael Laurenti | Sustainability | 19 pp. | doi:10.3390/su11020341
- #GAZV32 The communities and materials of repair: collectively reflecting on repair practices of everyday artefacts - 2026 | Bilge Merve Aktaş, Hazal Gümüş Çiftçi | CoDesign | 21 pp. | doi:10.1080/15710882.2025.2452575
- #P7EWHQ The Force of Things - 2004 | Jane Bennett | Political Theory | 27 pp. | doi:10.1177/0090591703260853
- #7VNTAB The gift of waste: The diversity of gift practices among dumpster divers - 2023 | Olli Pyyhtinen, Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen | Anthropological Theory | 23 pp. | doi:10.1177/14634996221117318
- #Q24SW5 The Gift, the Indian Gift and the 'Indian Gift' - 1986 | Jonathan Parry | Man | 22 pp. | doi:10.2307/2803096
- #UMYA27 The limits of the loops: critical environmental politics and the Circular Economy - 2021 | Kersty Hobson | Environmental Politics | 20 pp. | doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1816052
- #UTEUAD The logics of frugality: Reproducing tastes of necessity among affluent climate change activists - 2017 | Jean Léon Boucher | Energy Research & Social Science | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.001
- #P88564 The Minimalist Universe of Things. Living with Less in German Speaking Households - 2023 | Heike Derwanz | Home Cultures | 18 pp. | doi:10.1080/17406315.2024.2338007
- #LB5ACW The Political Economy of Circular Economies: Lessons from Future Repair Scenario Deliberations in Sweden - 2023 | Duncan McLaren, Johan Niskanen | Circular Economy and Sustainability | 25 pp. | doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00128-8
- #7RVN6J The Simple Bare Necessities: Scales and Paradoxes of Thrift on a London Public Housing Estate - 2022 | Catherine Alexander | Comparative Studies in Society and History | 32 pp. | doi:10.1017/s0010417522000159
- #RRPNRF The Sustainability of an Anthropology of the Anthropocene - 2022 | Thomas Hylland Eriksen | Sustainability | 11 pp. | doi:10.3390/su14063674
- #NM4W8T Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture - 2011 | Gert Spaargaren | Global Environmental Change | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010
- #GKZ9HP There is no sustainable circular economy without a circular society - 2021 | Charlotte Jensen, Florian Hofmann, Jakob Zwiers, Melanie Jaeger-Erben | Resources, Conservation and Recycling | 2 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105476
- #XDUQVM Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? - 2010 | Gessica Corradi, Luca Verzelloni, Silvia Gherardi | Management Learning | 19 pp. | doi:10.1177/1350507609356938
- #MB6S7L Toward an Ecology of Materials - 2012 | Tim Ingold | Annual Review of Anthropology | 20 pp. | doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920
- #7BM5AQ Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage - 2018 | Sasha Newell | History and Anthropology | 6 pp. | doi:10.1080/02757206.2017.1397647
- #6EFDXH Unpicking contemporary thrift: Getting on and getting by in everyday life - 2019 | Helen Holmes | The Sociological Review | 17 pp. | doi:10.1177/0038026118797837
- #SHZ6RT Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store - 2019 | Frederik Larsen | Business History | 18 pp. | doi:10.1080/00076791.2017.1418330
- #N7DKM2 Vogel's Net - 1996 | Alfred Gell | Journal of Material Culture | 25 pp. | doi:10.1177/135918359600100102
- #S54TH3 Waste and the superfluous: an introduction - 2017 | Elisabeth Schober, Thomas Hylland Eriksen | Social Anthropology | 6 pp. | doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12422
- #6C82ER Waste is not the end. For an anthropology of care, maintenance and repair - 2017 | Francisco Martínez | Social Anthropology | 5 pp. | doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12436
- #UBF5U3 What does that shirt mean to you? Thrift-store consumption as cultural capital - 2020 | Shelly Steward | Journal of Consumer Culture | 21 pp. | doi:10.1177/1469540517745707
- #LB72BP What future for collaborative consumption? A practice theoretical account - 2019 | Gert Spaargaren, Walter Fraanje | Journal of Cleaner Production | 10 pp. | doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.197
- #9X3WKH Whose Collection Is It Anyway? An Autoethnographic Account of `Dividing the Spoils' upon Divorce - 2007 | Jackie Goode | Cultural Sociology | 19 pp. | doi:10.1177/1749975507082055
- #ZNC4FL WITH and WITHOUT THINGS. AN INTRODUCTION - 2023 | Francisco Martínez, Tomás Errázuriz | Home Cultures | 15 pp. | doi:10.1080/17406315.2024.2347703
- #ZJUEY4 ‘It will Keep Circulating’: Loving and Letting Go of Things in Swedish Second-hand Markets - 2019 | Anna Bohlin | Worldwide Waste | 11 pp. | doi:10.5334/wwwj.17
- #VWPB2S ‘It's Kind of Saving them a Job isn't it?’ The Consumption Work of Household Recycling - 2015 | Kathryn Wheeler, Miriam Glucksmann | The Sociological Review | 19 pp. | doi:10.1111/1467-954x.12199
- #UTUMYN ‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care - 2012 | María Puig de la Bellacasa | The Sociological Review | 20 pp. | doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02070.x
- #EDFB5G “If I don’t do it, it feels wrong”: embodying environmental ethical reflexivity through cultivation and enactment of practices [cited] - 2024 | Anne Sofie Møller Askholm | Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy | 12 pp. | doi:10.1080/15487733.2024.2350204
- #3F4AVR “Still good life”: On the value of reuse and distributive labor in “depleted” rural Maine [cited] - 2020 | Brieanne Berry, Cindy Isenhour | Economic Anthropology | 16 pp. | doi:10.1002/sea2.12176

Books (20)
- #GABXSA Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies - 1995 | Daniel Miller | 350 pp.
- #UX42KU Anthropology and the Economy of Sharing [cited] - 2016 | Thomas Widlok | 240 pp. | doi:10.4324/9781315671291
- #VC6397 Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-hand Clothes - 2015 | Andrew Brooks | 298 pp. | doi:10.5040/9781350219243
- #8J3FXD Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality [cited] - 2003 | Elizabeth Shove | 236 pp. | doi:10.5040/9781474214605
- #2EDLQU Elusive Consumption - 2004 | Helene Brembeck, Karin M. Ekström | 254 pp. | doi:10.5040/9781474214704
- #BJ6B3C From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary - 2007 | Zsuzsa Gille | 266 pp.
- #4LST57 Household Recycling and Consumption Work [cited] - 2015 | Kathryn Wheeler, Miriam Glucksmann | 249 pp. | doi:10.1057/9781137440440
- #R26U48 Materiality - 2005 | Daniel Miller | 302 pp.
- #Y3KME8 My Life with Things: The Consumer Diaries - 2016 | Elizabeth Chin | 248 pp. | doi:10.1515/9780822374268
- #B5KMLA Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care - 2025 | Petra Kuppinger | Palgrave Macmillan | 28 pp. | doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99875-1
- #VKBZ23 Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social - 1996 | Theodore R. Schatzki | 256 pp. | doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527470
- #5AXAEJ The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes [cited] - 2012 | Elizabeth Shove, Matt Watson, Mika Pantzar | 206 pp. | doi:10.4135/9781446250655
- #83R4U2 The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish - 2006 | Gay Hawkins | 80 pp.
- #R49AUC The Nexus of Practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners - 2017 | Allison Hui, Elizabeth Shove, Theodore Schatzki | 237 pp. | doi:10.4324/9781315560816
- #3LSRBZ The Perception of the Environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill - 2000 | Tim Ingold | 480 pp.
- #6J5MKL The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory - 2001 | Eike von Savigny, Karin Knorr Cetina, Theodore R. Schatzki | 253 pp. | doi:10.4324/9780203977453
- #RCRP8Z The World of Goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption - 1996 | Baron Isherwood, Mary Douglas | 198 pp.
- #BX2YWY Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically - 2007 | Amiria Henare, Martin Holbraad, Sari Wastell | 248 pp.
- #8YF7LY Thrift and its Paradoxes: From Domestic to Political Economy - 2022 | Catherine Alexander, Daniel Sosna | 232 pp. | doi:10.3167/9781800734623
- #3N7TTE Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture - 2009 | Elizabeth Shove, Frank Trentmann, Richard Wilk | 251 pp. | doi:10.5040/9781474215862

Book chapters (12)
- #TNE9JN Habits and Their Creatures - 2012 | Elizabeth Shove | The Habits of Consumption | Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies | pp. 100-112 | 13 pp.
- #EVCWDH Introduction. Storing and storying the serendipity of objects - 2013 | Patrick Laviolette | Things in Culture, Culture in Things | Approaches to Culture Theory | pp. 13-33 | 11 pp.
- #PB2Z6X Introduction: commodities and the politics of value [cited] - 1986 | Arjun Appadurai | The Social Life of Things | Cambridge University Press | pp. 3-63 | 31 pp. | doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003
- #WMSENQ Sustainable consumption as a systemic challenge: inter- and transdisciplinary research and research questions - 2015 | Philip J. Vergragt, Sylvia Lorek | Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption | Edward Elgar Publishing | pp. 19-31 | 14 pp. | doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00008
- #V4V7XC Sustainable Consumption, Behaviour Change Policies and Theories of Practice [cited] - 2012 | Andrew McMeekin, Dale Southerton, David Evans | The Habits of Consumption | Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies | pp. 113-129 | 17 pp.
- #BZ63DX Sustainable practices: social theory and climate change - 2013 | Elizabeth Shove, Nicola Spurling | Sustainable Practices | Routledge | pp. 17-30 | 22 pp. | doi:10.4324/9780203071052-6
- #Y3CFPX The Assembling of Circular Consumption: A sociomaterial practice approach - 2023 | Christian Fuentes, Elina Närvänen, Nina Mesiranta | The Routledge Handbook of Catalysts for a Sustainable Circular Economy | Routledge | pp. 535-549 | 15 pp. | doi:10.4324/9781003267492-30
- #9DHD6K The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process - 1986 | Igor Kopytoff | The Social Life of Things | Cambridge University Press | pp. 64-92 | 15 pp. | doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004
- #3SKV2A The cultural dimension of sustainable consumption practices: an exploration in theory and policy - 2013 | Gert Spaargaren | Innovations in Sustainable Consumption | Edward Elgar Publishing | 13 pp. | doi:10.4337/9781781001349.00022
- #72GVQ9 The Habits of Consumption [cited] - 2012 | Alan Warde, Dale Southerton | The Habits of Consumption | Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies | pp. 1-25 | 25 pp.
- #KWZ2A4 Theories of Practice and Sustainable Consumption [cited] - 2015 | Alan Warde, Daniel Welch | Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption | Edward Elgar Publishing | pp. 84-100 | 17 pp. | doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00013
- #Q8AKGZ Towards a Better Accounting of the Roles of Body, Things and Habits in Consumption - 2012 | Harold Wilhite | The Habits of Consumption | Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies | pp. 87-99 | 13 pp.

Doctoral theses (3)
- #QRRZP2 Consumption and Practice: Unfolding Consumptive Moments and the Entanglement with Productive Aspects - 2013 | Benjamin Julien Hartmann | 157 pp.
- #ZC3PHV Patchworks of Care: Ethics and Practice of Care in the Organic Food Movement in Latvia - 2020 | Agnese Bankovska | 234 pp.
- #8EVNK8 The (im)possibilities of circular consumption: Producing and performing circular clothing consumption in retail and household settings - 2025 | Réka Tölg | 138 pp.

Reports (1)
- #XBPXDL Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption and the environment - 1998 | Alan Warde, Elizabeth Shove | 17 pp.

Spreadsheet (1)
- #XGCWS4 Ieva coded excerpt spreadsheet

### 4. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `get_document`

```json
{
  "id": "4V8VH7"
}
```

#### Tool call: `get_document`

```json
{
  "id": "FYG32U"
}
```

### 5. Tool result: get_document

THESIS #4V8VH7
Title: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

Outline:
  - 1 #ZF9EYF Introduction
    - 1.1 #LAR465 Latvian context and research
    - 1.2 #MUKRGA A note on terms
    - 1.3 #FVXBEK The structure of the thesis
  - 2 #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
    - 2.1 #Q2WXHP Theories of Practice
    - 2.2 #WULWDF Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
    - 2.3 #HQ4PZX Consumption practices
    - 2.4 #23NMLX Consumption Work
    - 2.5 #ULSUAX Conclusion
  - 3 #LYTS7L Research methodology: A Practice  Freecycle
    - 3.1 #ZXRYYU The site
    - 3.2 #3CQF69 Setting the scene: A day in Brīvbode
    - 3.3 #U3GSXB Ethnography of Practice
    - 3.4 #VMQSHJ Participant observation
    - 3.5 #GU86TB Interviews
    - 3.6 #BRBBF9 Data analysis
    - 3.7 #TGAMBJ Research ethics
  - 4 #9XAKTW Keeping Things Moving: Brīvbode as a Practice of Circulation
    - 4.1 #2JEZWG Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home
    - 4.2 #PBFQ5E Where It Begins: The Site as Active Flow
    - 4.3 #QP7HMF Reading the Room: Norms and Competencies of Circulation
    - 4.4 #PZH45P Not a Charity: The Moral Economy of Exchange
    - 4.5 #7Z8WUY Letting Go: Attachment Without Price
    - 4.6 #W2WRDC What People Find Here: Plural Meanings of Acquisition
    - 4.7 #GTJY22 Quiet or Reflected Sustainability?
    - 4.8 #A3X9XX Conclusion: Holding Together Incompatible Orientations
  - 5 #82G2QE Holding It Together: Care and Consumption Work in Brīvbode
    - 5.1 #N8D3HT Time to Give: Volunteers and the Sufficiency Lifestyle
    - 5.2 #SLFJ9K Priceless Valuation: Sorting, Curation, and Care
    - 5.3 #EBTHSE Not the Bin: Modal Labour and the Informal Route
    - 5.4 #L38KUE It’s On Me: Networks, Gender, and the Transmission of Care
    - 5.5 #75D5UH Conclusion
  - 6 #M9WQLY CONCLUSION
  - 7 #FTE3UX SUMMARY
  - 8 #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  - 9 #TY2EB4 KOKKUVÕTE

### 6. Tool result: get_document

THESIS #FYG32U
Title: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

Outline:
  - 1 #SVS6HK Introduction
    - 1.1 #QXGS6P Policies
    - 1.2 #L2U838 Latvian context and background
    - 1.3 #PESH7N Research questions
    - 1.4 #AKBRP4 A note on terms
    - 1.5 #CHZ8HG The structure of the thesis
  - 2 #W8HHQV Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
    - 2.1 #L2J4AM Theories of Practice
    - 2.2 #3DTHL8 Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
    - 2.3 #UF33B6 Consumption practices
    - 2.4 #LMKLTZ Consumption Work
    - 2.5 #Q3A3ZZ Conclusion
  - 3 #YNEV47 Research methodology: In The Field To Freecycle
    - 3.1 #V98SCK The site
    - 3.2 #L5LL6E Setting the scene: A day in Brīvbode
    - 3.3 #54NUTA Ethnography of Practice
    - 3.4 #LEHJ6B Participant observation
    - 3.5 #KVQFHZ Interviews
    - 3.6 #PNY46U Data analysis
    - 3.7 #9RFZZ6 Research ethics
  - 4 #3X7JKL The circulation of things and things that sustain it
    - 4.1 #M45HLW Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home
    - 4.2 #WY6KPH Managing the flow on site
      - 4.2.1 #C2AQ4D Material elements in Brīvbode: the physical site and infrastructure
      - 4.2.2 #FUQJQ5 Circulation norms and competencies
      - 4.2.3 #QLVPVE Meanings: the moral economy of exchange
    - 4.3 #V753D5 Non-monetary exchange and attachment: competencies of letting go
    - 4.4 #Z7Y86N Plural meanings of acquisition that sustain participation in Brīvbode
    - 4.5 #6535KC Quiet or reflected sustainability?
    - 4.6 #QS26PQ Conclusion
  - 5 #F2943E The Work of Circular Consumption
    - 5.1 #KWZ8DM Volunteer labour and sufficiency lifestyle
    - 5.2 #L5PE5X Valuation work without the context of price
    - 5.3 #A43655 Modal labour across socioeconomic modes
    - 5.4 #38335C Processual labour: exchange networks and gendered work
      - 5.4.1 #GGGPNV Conclusion
  - 6 #P4YU8Y CONCLUSION
  - 7 #W4BGDH SUMMARY
  - 8 #BA7Z5L LIST OF SOURCES
  - 9 #XR3UUN KOKKUVÕTE

### 7. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `read`

```json
{
  "blocks": [
    "ZF9EYF",
    "SVS6HK"
  ],
  "expand": true
}
```

### 8. Tool result: read

THESIS #4V8VH7
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #ZF9EYF Introduction

PARAGRAPH #J4M2WK
  We live in a context of overproduction where managing the flow of things in households becomes both a practical and a moral problem. In the case of textiles in particular, large quantities of clothing circulate through markets at increasing speed while average use time continues to decline. Circular economy policies increasingly position reuse and extended product lifetimes as solutions, yet the success of it depends on everyday practices that are labour-intensive and socially uneven (Hobson et al. 2021).

PARAGRAPH #ADQD9U
  This thesis is an ethnographic study of freecycling – the circulation of things within a non-monetary context – in Brīvbode, a volunteer-run swapshop1 in Riga. It examines how freecycling is organised and sustained as a social practice and what work it requires from its participants. Freecycling is viewed as a socially embedded, materially organized practice, and in this thesis it is situated within broader debates on sustainable consumption practices.

PARAGRAPH #XKELL5
  Consumption and divestment practices are changing, shaped by new infrastructure and policy developments – Latvia introduced mandatory textile collection in 2023, and new secondhand platforms are expanding the routes available for sequential flows of household goods. A study of Brīvbode contributes to understanding this changing practice landscape by offering an empirical account of one specific site where divestment, acquisition, and non-monetary exchange come together, at a particular moment in the development of circular consumption practices in Latvia. Freecycling, as viewed in this thesis, is a practice that contains elements that are widely shared and common but are placed and enacted in a new context of non-monetary exchange in a non-domestic site. Thus I argue that Brīvbode offers to practitioners somehow familiar, yet new ways of relating to objects and people (Holmes, 2018).

PARAGRAPH #SNLDAM
  The thesis draws on two main analytical frameworks. The first is practice theory, following Shove, Pantzar and Watson (2012) and other authors studying sustainable consumption practices. Freecycling is analysed as a practice-entity constituted by materials, meanings, and competencies. The second theoretical framework is Wheeler and Glucksmann's (2015) concept of consumption work that brings attention to the range of tasks required of consumers before or after the moment of exchange, on which consumption itself depends, especially within contexts of circular economy initiatives. It is extended here to include the volunteer labour of the freeshop and the divestment networks through which household surplus reaches it. Together these frameworks allow the thesis to attend to both what freecycling is as a recognisable social form, and what it costs in labour, skill, and care to sustain it.

PARAGRAPH #BTDD45
  Hobson et al. (2021) argue that research into circular economy consumption work must “move beyond the domestic sphere and space of the household” to examine consumption-based practices in other spaces, including Repair Cafés and community-based circular economy models, whether or not these are explicitly labelled as such. Brīvbode is such a space: a semi-public site where the ordinarily private labour of divestment and acquisition becomes visible and socially acknowledged, and where volunteer labour — sorting, curating, maintaining quality standards, and managing social dynamics — sustains the infrastructure through which things continue to circulate.

PARAGRAPH #UBJLE3
  The study is based on participant observation in Brīvbode combined with fifteen semi-structured interviews with visitors, regular participants, and volunteers. My own participation as a volunteer shaped the fieldwork and is reflected in the analysis.

PARAGRAPH #PYHGNL
  The thesis is guided by two research questions:

PARAGRAPH #NSNSQ3
  How is freecycling organised and sustained in Brīvbode as a non-monetary, non-domestic site – what materials, meanings and competencies constitute it and how do they interact?

PARAGRAPH #3TTCZA
  What work does freecycling in Brīvbode require from participants, and how is that work currently distributed?

PARAGRAPH #577FMZ
  The bulk of things circulating in Brīvbode are textiles – mostly clothing, but also home textile. Textiles have been identified as a priority sector in the European Union’s Circular Economy Action Plan (European Commission, 2020), and EU Textile Strategy (2022-ongoing) states that textiles should be durable, repairable, reusable, and reuse should be part of the desired system outcome. [..] [Statistics on Baltics as the destination in the circular economies of other countries…]

SECTION #LAR465 Latvian context and research

PARAGRAPH #Y38N9B
  Historically, second-hand in Latvia has been more commonly associated with acquisition rather than divestment. The colloquial term humpalas – derived from humānā palīdzība (humanitarian aid) – reflects the history of donated clothing arriving from abroad, particularly in the post-socialist period. In this context, second-hand goods were framed as assistance in times when access to consumer goods was limited rather than as part of a reciprocal or circular system, and organised opportunities for individuals to pass on their own items in organised ways were typically confined to informal exchanges or charitable donations.

PARAGRAPH #SRVVZ4
  A shift began with the emergence of more structured divestment infrastructures, such as the opening of the first Otrā Elpa charity shop in Riga in 2009. These initiatives introduced new channels for divestment, and gradually moved second-hand consumption from a one-directional flow of aid toward a more participatory system of reuse. Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States: a 2023 representative survey found that 55% of Latvian participants currently buy second-hand clothing (Akule et al., 2023), and in 2018 second-hand accounted for around 40% of textile consumption in Latvia (Watson et al., 2020).

PARAGRAPH #BHE8T3
  In recent years the landscape has diversified further, with online groups, neighbourhood swapping events, book and plant exchange shelves, digital resale platforms, and informal stall-based initiatives all forming part of a dispersed network of everyday circulation practices.

PARAGRAPH #4FP5K7
  Various exchange, divestment and second hand alternatives are currently available and are routinely used by people in Riga – online groups, charity shops and textile collection containers – but what sets Brīvbode apart is the operation on a physical site, the exchange without regulated monetary transaction, and a sustained volunteer infrastructure that makes repeated visits possible and socially meaningful. It is open every week, year-round, and this regularity is central to what it offers – a route for acquisition and divestment, but also a predictable rhythm that participants can build into their everyday routines.

PARAGRAPH #7LMSFU
  In recent years, a range of initiatives for circulation and reuse of everyday goods have emerged in Latvia, indicating a growing and also increasingly institutionalised diversification of non-market and low-cost access practices. [Different modes – institutional, informal initiatives – that are also based on different types of work?] [Andele Mandele and Vinted – growing second hand sector.] Access to infrastructure not distributed evenly (Akule et al. 2013).

PARAGRAPH #2CU6EC
  Similar practices have long operated in digital environments, with specified online groups facilitating the redistribution of goods between users, e.g. “Atbrīvojies no lietām” (“Rid yourself of things”) – the names of these groups also indicate them as stemming from divestment, initiated by the giver as an opportunity to gain freedom from the burden of unwanted ownership.

PARAGRAPH #YNKV5D
  In recent years more informal small scale infrastructures have become visible in urban space, such as book and plant exchange shelves located in libraries, clinics, educational institutions and cafés. Organised events, such as neighbourhood-based swapping, contribute to this landscape. Also smaller scale informal initiatives exist, for example, a participant told me about a trader who has set up a swapshop-like space in an unused stall in Matīsa market in Riga, maintaining it alongside her own activities. According to my interlocutors, such spaces attract regular users and form part of a dispersed network of everyday circulation practices.

PARAGRAPH #NQNRFE
  At the same time, practices of leaving items in semi-public spaces – such as stairwells or next to waste containers – continue to operate as low-threshold forms of divestment, blurring the boundary between disposal and reuse. Second-hand retail chains remain a strong presence and provide access to low-cost goods that at times (e.g. special clearance days) approach free consumption. Other hybrid models combine elements of exchange and redistribution, such as the waste management company’s CleanR exchange point “Nomales” or the national reuse platform platform lietovelreiz.lv.

PARAGRAPH #JNSARN
  [Although, for participants this aspect is not always significant, Brīvbode sustains domestic reuse, without sending things to other countries (although leftovers are absorbed by the textile collection system.]

PARAGRAPH #C9N497
  The first “library of things” in Riga was opened at the library of Goethe Institute in 2021, and this spring another two were established – in Sarkandaugava neighbourhood (currently announced as working until February 2027 within a project framework) and another in the nearby coastal town of Carnikava (running alongside a swapshop, opened by in collaboration with a waste management company).

PARAGRAPH #TT4B8P
  Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States, particularly in Latvia, where it accounts for a substantial share of total consumption. In 2018 around 40% of textile consumption in Latvia was second-hand (Watson et. al., 2020). The collection system in Latvia has undergone rapid expansion and formalization through new legislation. Latvia introduced mandatory separate textile collection in 2023, reflecting the broader EU regulatory direction established by the Circular Economy Action Plan and the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles.

PARAGRAPH #T5G2TS
  A 2023 representative survey found that 55% of Latvian participants currently buy second-hand clothing, a rate similar to Estonia (61%) and Finland (56%).

PARAGRAPH #HZ8D53
  [Brīvbode focusing on domestic flows]

PARAGRAPH #N6UNLT
  References to other research in Latvia. Sufficiency lifestyles research. Circular textiles in Latvia… Andris Saulītis on barter shop.

SECTION #MUKRGA A note on terms

PARAGRAPH #5P28WG
  Choosing the right terms to refer to Brīvbode is not straightforward. For one, no word currently exists in Latvian to describe the practice, and the available English terms each carry connotations that fit only partially.

PARAGRAPH #JLS4NG
  The name “Brīvbode” is a more or less localization of the term “freeshop”: “brīv-” means “free”, while “bode” alludes to the cosy scale and affectionate oldschool character of a small shop, associated with a persona of bodnieks or bodniece – the person who attends to it and mediates the relations with visitors. Some regulars of Brīvbode use the diminutive “bodīte”, a form of endearment very common in Latvian.

PARAGRAPH #8S9QR2
  However, the organizers have a complicated relationship with the term “freeshop”. As Brīvbode manager Rasa shared in an interview, the name already existed when she joined the initiative and they were trying to come up with alternative names in the beginning but did not manage to replace it. Their preferred term is “swapshop” which I also use in this thesis. “Swapshop”, as I discuss in Chapter 4, positions Brīvbode as a site of exchange rather than charity. However, as a descriptive term for “what actually happens there” I consider swapping not suitable enough, as it overstates the symmetry and implies an exchange with one to one logic, which is not the case in Brīvbode. In this thesis, I use the term “freecycling” to refer to the what is done in Brīvbode, as it emphasises the circularity aspect of the practice. While freecycling has its own specific origin, associated with the Freecycle Network, an online platform for giving things away locally, I use the term nonetheless because it captures the non-monetary circulation of goods without implying directness of swapping or the one-directionality of donation.

SECTION #FVXBEK The structure of the thesis

PARAGRAPH #ALLPXH
  The thesis is organised as follows: Chapter Two reviews the relevant literature, situating the study within debates on practice theory and sustainable consumption and consumption work. Chapter Three describes the methodology, including the fieldwork context, interview approach, and analytical framework. Chapter Four, the first empirical chapter, examines Brīvbode as a site of freecycling practice: the materials flowing through it, the plural meanings and competencies that sustain giving and taking, and the non-monetary context that shapes the flows. Chapter Five turns more closely to the labour that sustains the flows described in Chapter Four, applying Wheeler and Glucksmann's consumption work framework to analyse the work performed by volunteers, participants, and the extended divestment networks that connect Brīvbode to surrounding households. The thesis concludes by drawing together the empirical findings and reflecting on what Brīvbode reveals about the conditions under which circular consumption practices can be sustained in everyday life.

THESIS #FYG32U
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #SVS6HK Introduction

PARAGRAPH #LAP6KP
  We live in a context of overproduction where managing things becomes both a practical and a moral problem.  Circular consumption is promoted as a solution, yet the success of it depends on everyday practices that are labour-intensive and socially uneven (Hobson et al. 2021). In the case of textiles in particular, large quantities of clothing circulate through markets at increasing speed while average use time continues to decline. Circular economy policies increasingly position reuse and extended product lifetimes as solutions, and consumer participation in secondhand markets has expanded rapidly across [the Global North].

PARAGRAPH #DG2R9J
  Aspirations to sustainable consumption persist within the constraints of everyday life, and households are sites not only of consumption but of ongoing sorting, storage, and divestment and disposal of things.

PARAGRAPH #5KSKRV
  This thesis is an ethnographic study of freecycling – the circulation of things within a non-monetary context – in Brīvbode, a volunteer-run swapshop1 in Riga. It examines how freecycling is organised and sustained as a social practice and what work it requires from its participants. Freecycling is viewed as a socially embedded, materially organized practice, and in this thesis it is situated within broader debates on sustainable consumption practices and the work that goes into sustaining them.

PARAGRAPH #BNRZRU
  Freecycling, as viewed in this thesis, is a practice that contains elements that are widely shared and common but are placed and enacted in a new context of non-monetary exchange in a non-domestic site. Thus I argue that Brīvbode offers to practitioners somehow familiar, yet new ways of relating to objects and people (Holmes, 2018).

PARAGRAPH #VQQ25N
  Practices of divestment are changing, shaped by new infrastructure and policy developments – Latvia introduced mandatory textile collection in 2023, and new secondhand platforms and practices are expanding the routes available for household goods. A study of Brīvbode contributes to understanding this changing practice landscape by offering an empirical account of one specific site where divestment, acquisition, and non-monetary exchange come together, at a particular moment in the development of circular consumption practices in Latvia.

PARAGRAPH #NT337E
  The thesis draws on two main analytical frameworks. The first is practice theory, following Shove, Pantzar and Watson (2012), which treats freecycling as a practice-entity constituted by materials, meanings, and competencies, and examines how it recruits and retains participants across different social positions and life situations. The second is Wheeler and Glucksmann's (2015) concept of consumption work that brings attention to the range of tasks required of consumers before or after the moment of exchange, on which consumption itself depends. It is extended here to include the volunteer labour of the freeshop and the divestment networks through which household surplus reaches it. Together these frameworks allow the thesis to attend to both what freecycling is as a recognisable social form, and what it costs in labour, skill, and care to sustain it.

PARAGRAPH #FYJU8R
  As Hobson et al. (2021) argue, research should examine non-domestic spaces where individuals come together around circular practices – regardless of whether these activities are explicitly labeled as “circular economy”. Other authors have reinforced this call for studies of community based dimensions of circular consumption (Luukkonen et al., 2024, Mesiranta et al., 2025). Brīvbode is such a space: a site where the ordinarily private labour of divestment and acquisition can become visible and socially acknowledged, and where volunteer labour sustains infrastructure continuous with the domestic labour it serves.

PARAGRAPH #JQF8LX
  The study is based on participant observation in Brīvbode combined with fifteen semi-structured interviews with visitors, regular participants, and volunteers. My own participation as a volunteer shaped the fieldwork and is reflected in the analysis.

PARAGRAPH #6G862E
  This thesis extends the consumption work framework in two directions. First, it examines consumption work at a semi-public site rather than within the domestic sphere. In discussion of research agenda for circular economies Hobson et al. (2021) call explicitly for research that moves beyond the household to examine how consumption work is organised and distributed in community and public initiatives. Brīvbode is such a space: a site where the ordinarily private labour of divestment and acquisition becomes briefly visible and socially acknowledged, and a site where also public volunteer labor – sorting, curating, maintaining quality standards, managing social dynamics – sustains a service, itself a form of consumption work that is continuous with the domestic labour it serves.

SECTION #QXGS6P Policies

PARAGRAPH #H59VTK
  The bulk of things circulating in Brīvbode are textiles – mostly clothing, but also home textile. Textiles have been identified as a priority sector in the European Union’s Circular Economy Action Plan (European Commission, 2020), and concrete regulatory frameworks, including the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles promote mandatory separate collection of textile waste and extend producer responsibility schemes.

PARAGRAPH #L3T7ZT
  EU Textile Strategy (2022-ongoing) states that textiles should be durable, repairable, reusable, and reuse should be part of the desired system outcome.

PARAGRAPH #SS3QJG
  Increased consumer participation in second hand markets and growth of digital resale platforms. The expansion of second hand markets has not resolved the problem of excess. Resale platforms and charity systems have grown rapidly across “Global North”, which means that higher quality garments are increasingly retained in local markets while large volumes of lower value items exceed the capacity of reuse systems. Surplus textiles are redistributed through global networks, often exported to regions without full resources to manage them.

SECTION #L2U838 Latvian context and background

PARAGRAPH #52XMVP
  Historically, second-hand in Latvia has been more commonly associated with acquisition rather than divestment. The colloquial term humpalas – derived from humānā palīdzība (humanitarian aid) – reflects the history of donated clothing arriving from abroad, particularly in the post-socialist period. In this context, second-hand goods were framed as assistance rather than as part of a reciprocal or circular system, (also people owned less….) and organised opportunities for individuals to pass on their own items in organised ways were typically confined to informal exchanges or charitable donations.

PARAGRAPH #58E3W3
  [Statistics on Baltics as the destination in the circular economies of other countries…]

PARAGRAPH #3QFXHC
  A shift began with the emergence of more structured divestment infrastructures, such as the opening of the first Otrā Elpa charity shop in Riga in 2009. These initiatives introduced new channels for divestment, and gradually moved second-hand consumption from a one-directional flow of aid toward a more participatory system of reuse. Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States: a 2023 representative survey found that 55% of Latvian participants currently buy second-hand clothing, and in 2018 second-hand accounted for around 40% of textile consumption in Latvia (Watson et al., 2020).

PARAGRAPH #WAKMKA
  In recent years the landscape has diversified further, with online groups, neighbourhood swapping events, book and plant exchange shelves, digital resale platforms, and informal stall-based initiatives all forming part of a dispersed network of everyday circulation practices. Latvia introduced mandatory separate textile collection in 2023, reflecting the broader EU regulatory direction established by the Circular Economy Action Plan and the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles.

PARAGRAPH #TQFGXU
  Various exchange, divestment and second hand alternatives are currently available and are routinely used by people in Riga – online groups, charity shops and textile collection containers – but what sets Brīvbode apart is the operation on a physical site, the exchange without regulated monetary transaction, and a sustained volunteer infrastructure that makes repeated visits possible and socially meaningful. It is open every week, year-round, and this regularity is central to what it offers – a route for acquisition and divestment, but also a predictable rhythm that participants can build into their everyday routines.

PARAGRAPH #LARHJE
  In recent years, a range of initiatives for circulation and reuse of everyday goods have emerged in Latvia, indicating a growing and also increasingly institutionalised diversification of non-market and low-cost access practices. [Different modes – institutional, informal initiatives – that are also based on different types of work?]

PARAGRAPH #GYE3DM
  Similar practices have long operated in digital environments, with specified online groups facilitating the redistribution of goods between users, e.g. “Atbrīvojies no lietām” (“Rid yourself of things”) – the names of these groups also indicate them as stemming from divestment, initiated by the giver as an opportunity to gain freedom from the burden of unwanted ownership.

PARAGRAPH #MDA3VW
  In recent years more informal small scale infrastructures have become visible in urban space, such as book and plant exchange shelves located in libraries, clinics, educational institutions and cafés. Organised events, such as neighbourhood-based swapping, contribute to this landscape. Also smaller scale informal initiatives exist, for example, a participant told me about a trader who has set up a swapshop-like space in an unused stall in Matīsa market in Riga, maintaining it alongside her own activities. According to my interlocutors, such spaces attract regular users and form part of a dispersed network of everyday circulation practices.

PARAGRAPH #LWNS3B
  At the same time, practices of leaving items in semi-public spaces – such as stairwells or next to waste containers – continue to operate as low-threshold forms of divestment, blurring the boundary between disposal and reuse. Second-hand retail chains remain a strong presence and provide access to low-cost goods that at times (e.g. special clearance days) approach free consumption. Other hybrid models combine elements of exchange and redistribution, such as the waste management company’s CleanR exchange point “Nomales” or the national reuse platform platform lietovelreiz.lv.

PARAGRAPH #VHLSGN
  [Although, for participants this aspect is not always important, Brīvbode sustains domestic reuse, without sending things to countries (although leftovers are absorbed by the textile collection system]. – Brīvbode operates with everyday goods.]

PARAGRAPH #65MAW9
  The first “library of things” in Riga was opened at the library of Goethe Institute in 2021, and this spring another two were established – in Sarkandaugava neighbourhood (currently announced as working until February 2027 within a project framework) and another in the nearby coastal town of Carnikava (running alongside a swapshop, opened by in collaboration with a waste management company).

PARAGRAPH #27ALZ6
  [Andele Mandele and Vinted – growing second hand sector.] Access to infrastructure not distributed evenly (Akule et al. 2013).

PARAGRAPH #N7FBEN
  Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States, particularly in Latvia, where it accounts for a substantial share of total consumption. The collection systems in these countries, especially in Latvia, have undergone rapid expansion and formalization through new legislation. [source reference]

PARAGRAPH #HQJHKZ
  A 2023 representative survey found that 55% of Latvian participants currently buy second-hand clothing, a rate similar to Estonia (61%) and Finland (56%)

PARAGRAPH #7QHFCZ
  Estonia and Latvia have a higher consumption of second-hand clothing, in 2018 almost 20% of textile consumption in Estonia was second-hand and in Latvia it was even around 40%. (Watson et. al., 2020)

PARAGRAPH #FPL2PJ
  References to other research in Latvia. Sufficiency lifestyles research. Circular textiles in Latvia… Andris Saulītis on barter shop.

SECTION #PESH7N Research questions

PARAGRAPH #TXEKP8
  How is freecycling organised and sustained in Brīvbode as a non-monetary, non-domestic site? What social practice elements constitute freecycling in Brīvbode and how do they interact?

PARAGRAPH #KK7JMG
  What work does freecycling in Brīvbode require from participants, and how is that work currently distributed?

SECTION #AKBRP4 A note on terms

PARAGRAPH #JF9UJX
  Choosing the right terms to refer to Brīvbode is not straightforward. For one, no word currently exists in Latvian to describe the practice, and the available English terms each carry connotations that fit only partially.

PARAGRAPH #HJHZ8T
  The name “Brīvbode” is a more or less localization of the term “freeshop”: “brīv-” means “free”, while “bode” alludes to the cosy scale and affectionate oldschool character of a small shop, associated with a persona of bodnieks or bodniece – the person who attends to it and mediates the relations with visitors. Some regulars of Brīvbode use the diminutive “bodīte”, a form of endearment very common in Latvian.

PARAGRAPH #3XYWXD
  However, the organizers have a complicated relationship with the term “freeshop”. As Brīvbode manager Rasa shared in an interview, the name already existed when she joined the initiative and they were trying to come up with alternative names in the beginning but did not manage to replace it. Their preferred term is “swapshop” which I also use in this thesis. “Swapshop”, as I discuss in Chapter 4, positions Brīvbode as a site of exchange rather than charity. However, as a descriptive term for “what actually happens there” I consider swapping not suitable enough, as it overstates the symmetry and implies an exchange with one to one logic, which is not the case in Brīvbode. In this thesis, I use the term “freecycling” to refer to the what is done in Brīvbode, as it emphasises the circularity aspect of the practice. While freecycling has its own specific origin, associated with the Freecycle Network, an online platform for giving things away locally, I use the term nonetheless because it captures the non-monetary circulation of goods without implying directness of swapping or the one-directionality of donation.

SECTION #CHZ8HG The structure of the thesis

PARAGRAPH #L4Y7RQ
  The thesis is organised as follows: Chapter Two reviews the relevant literature, situating the study within debates on practice theory and sustainable consumption and consumption work. Chapter Three describes the methodology, including the fieldwork context, interview approach, and analytical framework. Chapter Four, the first empirical chapter, examines Brīvbode as a site of freecycling practice: the materials flowing through it, the plural meanings and competencies that sustain giving and taking, and the non-monetary context that shapes the flows. Chapter Five turns more closely to the labour that sustains the flows described in Chapter Four, applying Wheeler and Glucksmann's consumption work framework to analyse the work performed by volunteers, participants, and the extended divestment networks that connect Brīvbode to surrounding households. The thesis concludes by drawing together the empirical findings and reflecting on what Brīvbode reveals about the conditions under which circular consumption practices can be sustained in everyday life.

### 9. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `read`

```json
{
  "blocks": [
    "9XAKTW",
    "3X7JKL"
  ],
  "expand": true
}
```

### 10. Tool result: read

THESIS #4V8VH7
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #9XAKTW Keeping Things Moving: Brīvbode as a Practice of Circulation

PARAGRAPH #PL9BXR
  This chapter examines freecycling as a practice constituted by a physical venue and the materials flowing through it, the meanings that recruit and retain participants, and the competencies that order the exchange. Throughout the chapter I move between analysis of freecycling as practice-entity and as performance, especially attending to moments of friction and tension where the two pull against each other.

PARAGRAPH #EKYQ3W
  Following the trajectory of things moving through Brīvbode, I trace the incoming flow of things into Brīvbode, starting with the decisions of divestment in the households of participants. I look at how Brīvbode is positioned among possible routes of divestment, and turn to the site itself to see how its material elements sustain the practice of circulation, as well as how the competencies and norms at play let the swapshop cope with the constant pressure of overflow.

PARAGRAPH #XYAHKP
  Turning towards the acquisition side, I show how the value and usefulness of Brīvbode is experienced through a plurality of meanings, and how participants negotiate between conceptions of charity and exchange. I also examine how the absence of price reshapes participants’ attachment to objects, and the competencies of letting go that the practice both requires and cultivates. Finally I consider the range of participant orientations towards freecycling as a practice of sustainability.

PARAGRAPH #L252MY
  Across the chapter, I sustain the view that the character of Brīvbode as a non-monetary site of exchange is held together less by a single definition than by the moral economy that allows incompatible orientations to coexist.

SECTION #2JEZWG Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home

PARAGRAPH #5XUPCJ
  The material outcome of one practice present in Brīvbode (domestic divestment: things arrive) is a direct resource for another (sequential acquisition: things are taken), sustaining the circularity between different households and the freeshop. Instead of starting at the “shop”, freecycling in Brīvbode can be viewed as starting with the outward flow of things no longer needed or wanted in the household and the question of what to do with them. The practice of managing this flow (what Počinkova et al. (2023) call voluntary disposal) is what brings most givers to Brīvbode. The swapshop offers them an opportunity for circulating materials as well as a way of managing attachment and detachment from things. Brīvbode is one node in the available infrastructure of divestment, and is distinguished from others by what it means to route things through it.

PARAGRAPH #CLU5VP
  Noting how meanings migrate across practices, Shove et al. (2012) mention how thrift, for example, is no longer expressed through darning socks at home – now a rather rare practice – but has moved, as Gregson (2007) shows, into methods and styles of disposal and divestment. Divesting responsibly has become one of the ways people sustain and recreate identity in relation to their things.

PARAGRAPH #TYTN9E
  The ideal encouraged by the organisers in Brīvbode is for participants to both give and take, yet the two roles do not always recruit the same carriers or sustain participation through the same meanings. Giving in Brīvbode is typically more structured by the motives of givers rather than by the needs of the receivers. Giving contributes to a stock of the swapshop and is shaped by the givers’ assessments of their sense of responsibility toward still-usable objects (too good to throw away), hopes for things finding new trajectories with other carriers, and their capacity to manage the work of getting rid of things well. The practice is donor-driven, and things arriving reflect more the rhythms and pressures of household life, and coordination with receivers’ needs is only indirect.

PARAGRAPH #WEBXCF
  Divestment in Brīvbode is distributed across time unevenly and concentrated around rhythms of domestic material arrangements and particular life events. People typically bring things in batches – no longer wanted items are set aside and accumulate at home until, e.g. a bag is full and is then divested to Brīvbode.

PARAGRAPH #AB93FC
  Moving home, renovation, seasonal clearing, and sorting through a deceased relative’s belongings generate larger pulses of divestment. Participants described sorting through an entire previous owner’s life when buying a flat, routing things to Brīvbode and to friends when downsizing, helping relatives to divest after moving home.

PARAGRAPH #7Y7J2Z
  The size of the home is a very constitutive material element for divestment as smaller living spaces generate a more immediate need to move things out in order to fulfill, for example, the ideal of an uncluttered home – this requires both strong competency for managing household material streams and established divestment routes for what must leave. Brīvbode functions as one such route.

PARAGRAPH #CWZ4L2
  The ideal of a decluttered home functions both as cultural script and as embodied relief. Gundega puts on tidying consultant TV shows when she sorts at home, though the volume of advice tends to produce anxiety rather than clarity – no one person can remember it all. Viesturs is more pragmatic about decluttering methods: "I sense there are all sorts of methods and things, but it all seems like a luxury problem to me. Although maybe we should promote something like that – users of those methods would definitely supply us with better quality content."

PARAGRAPH #V83RLN
  The act of bringing things to Brīvbode performs moral work that throwing away does not – it can relieve guilt of having acquired unnecessarily, maintain the identity of a responsible consumer, and transfer some of the responsibility for what happens next to the swapshop. Divesting well and finding a route that feels appropriate to the object's remaining value is itself a practice with normative dimensions: there are right and wrong ways to let things go, and Brīvbode offers one of the right ways.

PARAGRAPH #PQV5PN
  Participants who divest in Brīvbode mentioned the non-transparency of the textile container system in comparison to the freeshop. Both routes offer removal and a presumed social good, but participants expressed particular satisfaction for witnessing circulation in Brīvbode – moments when they saw someone taking the items they brought. Although giving and taking are decoupled and mediated by the swapshop, participants can sometimes observe the circulation during their visits, a characteristic noted by many with a kind of quiet pleasure. The divestment is completed by seeing or knowing an item was taken, and this visibility closes the divestment cycle affectively. The opportunity for other visitors to access the materials is valued, while the textile collection management system is deemed too distanced to imagine who benefits.

PARAGRAPH #7ZXWJU
  In absence of a specific receiver, while trying to negotiate the appropriate value and quality standards for the items circulated, givers construct a figure of a receiver, a meaning which shapes the practice from the giving side. Aiga describes her hope that a homeless person from the neighbourhoods of Ķengarags or Purvciems, someone in genuine need would use what she brings. This imagery expands what counts as worth passing on: objects that might be marginal by taste standards become appropriate if genuine need is the criterion, and the threshold for what counts as good enough shifts accordingly.

PARAGRAPH #YNY54V
  The threshold of acceptability in Brīvbode is negotiated situationally, and this uncertainty can become a source of tension. Aiga described how she continues wearing clothing that is slightly pilled and normally uses dry food items past their expiry date – her own standards of what remains usable are linked to the meaning of genuine need but she cannot know in advance whether the items she brings to Brīvbode will be acknowledged as suitable. After receiving comments once about the quality of something she brought to Brīvbode, she prefers to not linger and leave her things quickly. The imagined receiver who accepts everything gives way to the real social encounter where standards are negotiated by someone else.

PARAGRAPH #MS53CN
  The supply arriving in Brīvbode is shaped by these contested meanings – participant competencies of evaluating items as appropriate and the rhythms of domestic life. As such it is often unpredictable.

PARAGRAPH #796PVP
  In reality, Brīvbode also functions as a divestment route for items that more regulated reuse channels would not accommodate: unfinished repair projects and textile fragments can sometimes be found, photographs and used magazines, not entirely complete jigsaw puzzles. Sometimes volunteers would remark that they already look for signs of wear and tear in suspicion about reasons an item has been brought to Brīvbode. They are aware that the swapshop can become a route of last resort for objects that are genuinely difficult to route elsewhere. What counts as acceptable and what counts as waste is decided through social judgment rather than formal criteria. I sometimes brought things in my backpack but ended up not taking them out as on second thought they seemed too worn or not suited.

PARAGRAPH #HN8W7V
  Fieldwork observations reveal different versions and scales of what counts as usable and worthy: I recall a collection of single-use sugar packages; a bundle of expired covid tests (I spent time unpacking the alcohol wipes and watched a woman take them); carefully washed plastic containers that were taken to the recycling bin after all (although the sour cream containers are useful in spring for growing plantings). A regular visitor brought coloured wire offcuts generated by her husband’s wireworking practice – she imagined someone who makes art or does craft work with children could be taking them, as they were never on the shelf anymore the next time she visited. Her husband generates surplus, she routes it to Brīvbode through her domestic management, an unknown hypothetical third person absorbs it into their own. The trajectory is sustained by an imagined right-owner who may not exist, and the volunteers did not have the heart to tell her the bags of small plastic pieces were not used that way.

PARAGRAPH #5GWZER
  Yet unpredictability of supply works both ways – e.g. the same giver who took extra effort to send Brīvbode a parcel with stained old plates that raised volunteer questions about the balance of invested energy for handling it, divested a bag full of colourful folk-style knitted mittens another time – laid out on the table, those attracted many visitors’ attention with shared beauty. This uncertainty of supply is itself part of what sustains participant engagement with the practice through meanings of “serendipity” and magic moments of unexpected “good catch”.

PARAGRAPH #4G43HR
  The same logic that makes divestment easy also can make Brīvbode available as a pressure valve. Fast fashion sometimes arrives with tags still attached; one participant brought clothing she had purchased online – after it did not fit she arranged a return, and was told by the company to donate it rather than send it back – the retailer in this case is routing their surplus to volunteers to manage.

PARAGRAPH #9CFEH4
  Divestment is normalised and sought after. As Brīvbode manager Rasa observed: "Often we're simply a place to dump it all and go buy new things."  In this view, Brīvbode appears as evidence of the structural conditions it aspires to address rather than a solution to them. There is tension present in Brīvbode between the swapshop as an alternative caring system and as a low-threshold overflow channel, and this tension does not resolve easily.

SECTION #PBFQ5E Where It Begins: The Site as Active Flow

PARAGRAPH #2PU5ZY
  On Thursdays and Fridays a queue often forms by Brīvbode before noon – sometimes more than ten people wait to be let in. The first two hours are the busiest. Rasa sometimes takes a breath before unlocking the door: "It begins."

PARAGRAPH #X8RDCG
  After an item is divested to Brīvbode, it does not belong to the donor anymore, it belongs to the swapshop. This transfer of ownership is actively managed: takers are discouraged from taking things from the sorting table before they are processed, as their enthusiasm has caused discomfort to other visitors in the past.

PARAGRAPH #SUZYLN
  However, sorting is done “on the spot” and in the same room, and things move fast. As Larsen (2023) observes, in thrift shops, practices are often characterized by a "reversal" of standard economic logic, where the goal is to move things along as quickly as possible rather than to maximize the profit per individual item. This can also be said about Brīvbode – there’s excitement about things moving quickly.

PARAGRAPH #RQ8CCN
  Physical instead of virtual co-presence shapes the quality of encounters between people and objects. As Tan and Yeoh  (2024), writing about freecycling markets in Singapore, observe, “relational-material exchanges play out better as an embodied co-presence with others/things” – objects can be handled, tried on and assessed, and an item of decent quality will eventually find a taker.

PARAGRAPH #LHLZ8Y
  The physicality and permanence of Brīvbode as a site is one of the main attributes setting it apart from other similar initiatives that often struggle with availability of affordable rental space, especially in high density urban areas. Tan and Yeoh (2024) note how, because of this reason, organisers of Singapore markets must bin or redistribute excess items after every event. They identify availability of rental and storage space as one of the main pre-requisites for functioning freecycling initiatives – thus it is important to note how regular operation in the same physical venue constitutes the practice of freecycling, as it becomes a stable and recurring weekly infrastructure for participants. This enables visitors to sustain a regular visiting rhythm through which, for many of them, freecycling becomes genuinely embedded in everyday life.

PARAGRAPH #KMD7AJ
  The space in Brīvbode is organised and decorated to resemble a retail environment with a DIY aesthetic –  with hangers and shelves, and garments sometimes arranged by colour in the manner of the formerly operating secondhand chain Degas. The aesthetic is not fixed, however, as curatorial disagreements exist over the best presentation and each shift can leave its own curatorial mark. Rasa describes the tension between celebrating volunteer initiative and an aesthetic that, in her view, would communicate more value through similarity to a retail environment, leaving more space between things, signifying that quality items can be found in Brīvbode. "The emptier the shelves, the more people find," she notes. A different aesthetic displaying abundance of things on offer and decorating with plushies appeals to another volunteer. These mundane disagreements hold competing views about which meanings the practice of freecycling should enact. Material and meaning elements of the practice are not settled but are actively contested through performance.

PARAGRAPH #CL5CS8
  The regularity of operation that the physical on-site format allows also fosters social contact among participants. Opening hours twice per week is both a way to manage the necessary volunteer labour and a social encounter catalyst – temporal tightening means that visitors are more likely to encounter each other. The volunteer in charge of the shift anchors the social experience, and the personal relationships accumulate over repeated visits. "On Thursdays everyone asks where Nadja is. And on Fridays everyone asks where Viesturs is." While Brīvbode is not a primary site for socialisation for most participants, regular visitors, especially those living in single person households, noted the meaningfulness of the social aspect of visiting, the casual contact with known “faces”, Brīvbode being a place to go and the visits giving a structure to the week.

PARAGRAPH #WW8YUW
  Within the material realm, Brīvbode is also embedded in and dependent upon broader infrastructural arrangements in order to manage the overflow it cannot absorb. The swapshop passes leftover textiles – in some estimates up to 30 % of the received flow (Akule et al. 2023) – to textile collection containers. The shop would not be viable if it had to cover the costs of regular unsorted waste collection. Also, off-season clothing such as winter coats that take a lot of space are stored in collaboration with charity organisations that have access to larger storage premises. Brīvbode can sustain – in a pragmatic, improvised manner – because of this material entanglement instead of trying to resolve the full material cycle on its own.

PARAGRAPH #2TPNCM
  The physical experience of overflow is a constant of volunteering, and bags often arrive faster than they can be processed. Often my task during shifts was to sort and put out children’s items. The boxes were already full, with piles forming, when I asked Rasa: 'Don't you feel like the things are just pouring down on you?' 'Yes, that's why I no longer have any tolerance for things. I realise I feel relief that these clothes are dirty, because there simply isn't any more space."

PARAGRAPH #3USBHB
  During another shift, Rasa offered me a handmade black ceramic plate someone had brought that day. I was glad to take it, but before my departure confusion arose about where it had gone. It turned out, more stuff had piled up on top of it on the sorting table as visitors kept coming with their divestment. Rasa laughed: “This is how it is here.” As a material site, Brīvbode is an active flow that requires tending and occasionally swallows its own offerings.

PARAGRAPH #PNCAWA
  The pull of Brīvbode as a divestment destination persists even when the physical site is temporarily absent. For several weeks after the Brīvbode pop-up venue in Āgenskalns closed at the end of summer 2021, people kept bringing boxes and bags of belongings, leaving them in front of the empty shop. The practice had recruited carriers so effectively that the site’s closure did not interrupt the flow.

PARAGRAPH #SFAYYS
  The things are made visible by being put in the shop. It makes the material overflow more visible – there is no “away” to throw your things.

SECTION #QP7HMF Reading the Room: Norms and Competencies of Circulation

PARAGRAPH #TDQ4JL
  The material composition of Brīvbode reflects the gendered organisation of (clothing) consumption more broadly. The majority of items circulating through the freeshop are women’s and children’s clothing – a pattern that mirrors the more feminised character of household consumption management. As noted in the methodology chapter, men do participate in Brīvbode, but on a lesser scale and with different practice career tendencies – while men’s clothing is sought after, they also look for books to circulate in second hand markets, CD’s, electronics.

PARAGRAPH #BCDC5C
  The gendered asymmetry extends to the competencies required to manage the space. Viesturs described his initial challenge of developing a workable system for sorting women’s clothing after he started volunteering: "Well, f*ck, look, where do I put it. Trying to systematize women’s clothing, it’s like a tree with many branches." The competence of sorting – especially women’s clothing as in this case – is not self-evident as the proliferation of categories resists simple organisation and has to be worked out through practice.

PARAGRAPH #2U6CTU
  The standards applied to men’s clothing also operate differently. There is simply less of it, and the threshold for what is acceptable is lower – men’s clothing is assumed to be used for physical work and is assessed accordingly. One day two young women looking through the clothing boxes for film costumes picked up an undershirt and commented on how disgusting it was, while a man right next to them took it. Rasa later confirmed the shirt was not in a good condition, but she had put it out because, as she noted, everything gets taken from the men’s section. The norms of assessment reflect whose consumption practices the swapshop is organised around.

PARAGRAPH #F9CK8T
  While there are explicit written rules governing exchange in Brīvbode, those are framed in general relational terms – “bring things that would bring joy to someone; bring things you would give to a friend” – and there are no formal categories of exclusion. Norms regarding acceptability are defined and enacted situationally and relationally, which can be both a strength and a source of friction about where the boundaries lie.

PARAGRAPH #BZ6FJC
  Being in Brīvbode is characterized by constant sorting decisions, trying to maintain an acceptable level of presentation and quality of items. The work of maintaining quality and the work of maintaining relationships sometimes pull in different directions, and the balance between lenience and care is negotiated in every shift. At times I heard people felt uneasy about Viesturs openly commenting on things they had brought.

PARAGRAPH #Y7K4KZ
  This is observable even in the circulation of food items, which, although not central, are also present in Brīvbode. As opposed to many community-based exchange initiatives where the circulation of food is governed strictly, e.g. accepting only unopened items and carefully monitoring expiration dates, in Brīvbode the circulation is shaped less by formal regulation and more by trust and familiarity among participants. Open packages may be accepted when brought by known visitors, suggesting that assessments of safety and acceptability are negotiated socially.

PARAGRAPH #7CR75E
  A stronger boundary emerges in relation to certain categories of items, such as medicine. In one instance, a regular visitor brought various medications, explaining their uses to the day manager. While the items were initially placed on the table for taking, a while later another worker quietly removed them, remarking to me, “I don’t think I support this.” The removal was not communicated directly to the donor, suggesting a reluctance to enforce the norm explicitly. Instead of a formal refusal, workers might suggest that perhaps the giver has not noticed the defects, but items could be washed and brought back or simply delay decisions until the giver is no longer present.

PARAGRAPH #CUBS5Q
  "Man kaut kā mazāka vēlme ņemt visu, ko es redzu, par spīti tam, ka tas it kā ir tas 'brīv'... es kaut kā vairāk cienu to visu, kas tur ir izlikts." [I somehow feel less desire to take everything I see, despite the fact that it's all "free" – I somehow have more respect for everything that's laid out there.] Madara explicitly contrasts her response to freeness with others' – she imagines the hoarder who grabs because it's free, and positions herself as someone for whom freeness activates restraint rather than acquisition. This is the moral economy of freeshopping from the perspective of someone still in the early stages of learning the practice's norms. "Kādam varbūt tas 'brīv' rada vēlmi, ka viss ir bez maksas, tagad ņemam, ņemam, ņemam. Man tas nospēlē kaut kā tieši otrādāk." [For some, maybe "free" creates the urge that everything is free, so now we take, take, take. For me it works the opposite way.] "Es to uztveru kā apmaiņu. To vārdu 'brīvu' kaut kā izslēdzu... Sākumā tas tā bišķiņ mulsināja, ka esmu kā apzagusies." [I see it as exchange. I somehow switch off the word "free"… At first it was a bit confusing, as if I had stolen something.] This is competency acquisition: Madara is learning how to understand and inhabit the value regime of Brīvbode, and she narrates the process explicitly.

PARAGRAPH #MQPMT2
  Competencies of Circulation

PARAGRAPH #76T3WR
  The competencies that sustain freecycling in Brīvbode are largely social and evaluative rather than technical, and none of them require formal training — but each is acquired through repeated participation and is unevenly distributed across practitioners. Material literacy — recognising wool from synthetic fibres, identifying well-made construction, spotting a hidden stain — is foundational, and volunteers develop it most acutely through handling what arrives. Rasa, in the recollection of one student researcher who spent time in the shop, has "the most trained eye for the quality of things" [visuztrenētākā acs uz mantu kvalitāti]; her own acquisition criteria turn on fibre type and durability, preferring what is "more nature-friendly, ecological, and long-lasting." Visitors develop a more limited version of the same competency. Laura describes herself as a careful second-hand user who checks everything thoroughly, though she admits she has still occasionally taken home items that turned out to be broken on closer inspection.

PARAGRAPH #EXTCGS
  On the acquisition side, competence also means knowing when to come and how to navigate the space. Agate has mapped the visitor typology and times her arrivals strategically; Marta describes starting in the first room and returning when something new has arrived. Equally important is the negative competency of not taking — knowing what one needs and what one already has. Zane keeps a list on her phone of items she is actively looking for, and her stylist consultations work as an investment in self-knowledge that guards against impulsive acquisition. Agate explicitly asks herself while browsing whether a given item could be combined with what she already owns. This is cognitive work — holding a mental model of one's wardrobe and household — and without it, acquisition becomes impulsive and the divestment work follows. The competencies of acquisition and divestment are therefore inseparable: each unconsidered acquisition becomes future divestment labour.

PARAGRAPH #73DSQT
  On the divesting side, the practice expects items to arrive clean and in reasonable condition, requiring washing, stain-checking, and sometimes minor repair, though norms vary: Marija leaves the washing to the recipient, while Anna says she never divests anything that has been repaired. The boundary between "ready to circulate" and "needs more work first" is itself negotiated through the practice.

PARAGRAPH #J4CQAN
  “on material literacy, meaning the skills and knowledge about different materials, how durable they are and with what treatment they last longest. This includes knowledge about appropriate washing, storing (Figures 2 and 3) and other care techniques like using a lint shaver or an iron.”

SECTION #PZH45P Not a Charity: The Moral Economy of Exchange

PARAGRAPH #QU37KZ
  Practices have normative meanings – understandings upheld about what correct participation looks like, what the practice is for, and who belongs in it. In Brīvbode, normative work is done by organisers to uphold the meaning of the freecycling as an exchange as opposed to a charity. This framing is a normative aspiration – a claim about who belongs and on what terms, actively maintained against pressure from resellers and heavy-takers. The normative aspiration is held together by a moral vocabulary of equality and reciprocity – the norm that participants bring something or at least contribute in kind or offer their help at the shop is part of what defines active participation in the practice rather than use of a service. This positioning work is felt as particularly needed by organisers also because Brīvbode is located in the neighbourhood of Gaiziņš night shelter.

PARAGRAPH #KBESND
  As Rasa puts it: “Exchange is a very honest way of operating, it requires responsibility from both sides. When both wealthy and poor, old and young can participate, and everyone knows it's on the basis of exchange, that you are equal, nobody gets a discount, nobody is more special. To many people we simply say: “We are not a charity. It's not the case that you come and now demand that you need clean trousers. We are not a charity point, this is an exchange point. Do you actually have something with you for exchange, before you start setting the rules here?” Nadja is very good at negotiating this. “Go to the Red Cross, go to other places that are specifically a charitable institution! We are not a help institution.””

PARAGRAPH #T8P86W
  Widlok’s (2017) analysis of give boxes – small scale unattended exchange infrastructure in a German town – offers a frame for what the non-monetary arrangement achieves socially. Give boxes, he argues, separate the acts of giving and receiving – donors and recipients do not need to interact directly, and the intermediary space absorbs the social awkwardness of charity. Items move quickly, suggesting ongoing demand, while participants tend to frame their involvement in terms of giving even when they primarily take.

PARAGRAPH #UFJ4GC
  Brīvbode operates on a similar logic: the physical space mediates between participants, making it possible to take without performing need. At the same time, Widlok notes that give boxes are not straightforwardly sharing practices – they tend to be understood within a moral register of charity or almsgiving rather than open-ended reciprocity, and tensions arise when participants extract items for resale rather than use.

PARAGRAPH #7FPBUS
  The imperative to keep things flowing to avoid overflow creates a certain tolerance in case of suspicion for such practices that formally fall outside Brīvbode’s rules. Reselling is not allowed, yet resellers are a suspected presence in Brīvbode. Volunteers mentioned situations when other visitors in Brīvbode have told them they have recognized their divested items at the Āgenskalns flea market the following weekend, which Rasa acknowledges as straightforwardly unpleasant. Yet because it is not always possible to prove, there is also a working accommodation, and Rasa’s position is one of pragmatic acceptance: “At the same time it seems – if he'll find the next user for the thing anyway, the function is fulfilled. Better they make a little money and the thing finds its person, than some hoarder takes it and the things end up in a container." She laughs: "Well, what choice do I have but to believe… We support small businesses."

PARAGRAPH #QKY57B
  This reveals a hierarchy of meanings operating within Brīvbode’s moral economy. The object’s arrival to a sequential user is weighed as more important than the forbidden monetary transaction that may or may not occur along the way. The ethos of non-monetary exchange can be subordinated to the deeper logic of circulation. Besides, if visitors come with something in return, further trajectory is difficult to control.

PARAGRAPH #ERMRTL
  Viesturs frames this ecologically: "Well, I could see them now as forest sanitarians." Without moral approval, the resellers, the hoarders and heavy-takers are reframed as functional elements as they clear out the accumulation of materials that would otherwise clog the space. Viesturs response to this is tactical curatorial competency: if a person he suspects is present at the shop, he often doesn’t put new items out on the shelves until they leave. This is his practical judgement and competency to “read the room” enacted situationally.

SECTION #7Z8WUY Letting Go: Attachment Without Price

PARAGRAPH #GL6QPX
  The intensity of circulation of items in Brīvbode and its non-monetary context raise a question about the relationship between price and attachment. Evans’s (2020) framework suggests that attachment is produced through the acquisition-side moments of consumption – appropriation and appreciation, processes that are normally anchored by monetary investment. Assima et al. (2023) describe "financial myopia" – the difficulty of detaching from items one has spent significant money on, even when they are no longer used. This results in "neglected possessions" accumulating in wardrobes as disposal is deferred to avoid the feeling of wasting a significant investment.

PARAGRAPH #Q9UXGA
  The anchor of monetary investment is absent from acquisition in Brīvbode, and some participants articulate the shift in their own relationship to objects directly. Rasa describes how price normally operates as a binding force which Brīvbode alleviates: “You no longer have that heaviness around a thing – I bought it for €40, how can I now throw it out or give it away, not wear it. Now it's simply: if it doesn't suit, bring it back. Try it – it works, or it doesn't. It's much more free." She is pragmatic about this beyond Brīvbode too: “No matter where the garment comes from, there is that percentage of things I take or buy or acquire for myself that I always know won't get worn regardless of whether I've paid money for them or not. So the safest thing to do is to invest as little as possible, so that afterwards there are fewer regrets." This is a recalibration of what kinds of commitment acquisition is.

PARAGRAPH #PYZ6UH
  Fieldwork observations capture this in the dynamic of circulation. A woman arrives and leaves in different shoes than she came in: “I left mine here instead. Today with these trousers, the high heel doesn't suit. Hopefully no fungus..." Another laughs as she leaves her jacket in Brīvbode on a sunny day because she feels too hot: “I left home with clothes on but will be coming back in socks only. I don't need anything.” A third also swaps her jacket on the spot for one she prefers. The meaning of novelty comes across in these cases.

PARAGRAPH #34Z7TB
  Another aspect to the quality of attachment is the possibility of a return after trial and seeing whether attachment will form. It can be difficult to assess in the moment of acquisition whether an item will settle in person’s life. Bringing something back if it does not further loosens the relationship between taking and keeping, allowing a lower stakes and a more experimental participation. This trial opportunity was appreciated by participants whose physical attributes and body shapes are not always catered to in retail: "Because for a small person it's quite hard to find trousers... But here there's the opportunity to try them for some time and see."

PARAGRAPH #VXG4LU
  However, if acquisition carries less commitment, the same conditions that make divestment easier may make acquisition more frequent and less deliberate. My own divestment to Brīvbode often consists of things bought secondhand online as a preferred route of acquisition, but choosing not to invest effort in reselling when they don’t work out. The non-monetary regime does not automatically produce more careful consumption; its relationship to sufficiency depends on the meanings participants bring to it.

PARAGRAPH #5NWUSK
  Elīna describes feeling a sense of responsibility toward everything she acquires – whether bought secondhand, taken from a swap event, or found in Brīvbode. Once something has come to her, she feels obligated to find it a good next home rather than simply discard it: "If this has come to me, then this material... energy and work and transport went into producing it, and I can't just throw it away. I feel I have a duty to figure out how to pass it on to hands where it will be useful." She adds, however, that this sense of responsibility sometimes feels like too heavy a burden to carry.

PARAGRAPH #KM4KFK
  (Sometimes the relation to the shop is a source for jokes: “We have special mega discounts, 100 % – only today and tomorrow!”)

PARAGRAPH #F6TNUS
  The self-management work

PARAGRAPH #7397K7
  Managing the impulse to take because it is free. Marta describes this explicitly – learning to replace "free" with "exchange" in her mental vocabulary, developing the decision rule that if she is not sure she does not need it. This is deliberate self-regulation work, and it is not trivial. The non-monetary arrangement removes one natural brake on acquisition – financial cost – and participants who want to avoid accumulating must supply that brake themselves through conscious effort.

PARAGRAPH #PYSU33
  (moral economies of access and restraint)

PARAGRAPH #9XUDV9
  "Man bija ļoti daudz dažādu veidu... pēdējos pāris gadus es kaut kā esmu no tā atkāvusies, ka es tā vairs nedaru. Es tiešām ļoti izvērtēju, vai man tā lieta tiešām ir nepieciešama." [I used to have so many different kinds of things… in the last couple of years I've somehow weaned myself off it; I no longer do that. I really do evaluate whether the thing is genuinely necessary for me.] Madara describes a conscious shift away from impulse acquiring in secondhand contexts – she recognizes her own past behavior as a problem and has worked to change it. This is deliberate practice modification. Madara: "Es tiešām cenšos nebūt tā tante ar trīs maisiem, kas staigā katru dienu tur no vienas točkas uz otru. To es cenšos nepieļaut un cenšos arī sadraudzēties maksimāli ar tām lietām, kas man ir." [I really try not to be that auntie with three bags who walks every day from one spot to another. I try to avoid that, and try to make peace as much as I can with the things I already have.] Making peace with what you have – sufficiency as an active practice of relationship with objects rather than deprivation. This is a positive formulation of sufficiency that does not rely on environmental discourse.

PARAGRAPH #QCXR6D
  Elīna R. "S1: Bet kā tu nonāci pie tās sajūtas, pie tās atziņas – man jau pietiek? S2: Man vienkārši skapī vairs nav vietas. (smejas) Nu, arī, teiksim, tagad ir ziema, un ir džemperu laiks, un es saprotu, ka es tāpat neuzvelku visus savus džemperus. Nu, tātad man viņu ir acīmredzami par daudz. Un man arī patīk novalkāt lietas. Tur ir kaut kāds tāds, nu, man vismaz, īpašs tā kā kaifs, ka es ar šo lietu esmu tik daudz lietas darījusi kopā, ka viņa ir tik novalkāta, ka viņu, iespējams, pat vairs nevar salabot." [Interviewer: But how did you arrive at that feeling, that realisation – I already have enough? Elīna: There's simply no more space in my wardrobe. (laughs) Well – say it's winter now, sweater season, and I realise I don't wear all my sweaters anyway. So I obviously have too many of them. And I also like wearing things out. There's a kind of – well, for me at least, a special pleasure when I've gone through so much with a thing that it's worn down to the point where maybe it can't even be repaired anymore.]

PARAGRAPH #Z2Y4K8
  "Es esmu krājēja. Jā, es esmu krājēja." [I'm a hoarder. Yes, I'm a hoarder.] Aiga recognised hoarding tendencies in herself. She links it to scarcity experience – not having had much as a student, learning to keep things because things were hard to come by. The accumulation habit is understood as a survival response to past material insecurity, but she is actively working to change. The turning point was a month-long solo trip through Europe after her employment ended: "Es aizbraucu, un tad ar to arī sākās, ka tagad, nu, tagad tas ir izdarīts, tagad ir jādomā kaut kas par lietām, kas ir par daudz." [I went away [on the trip], and that's when it started – that now, well, it's been done, and now I have to think something about the things that are too many.] Travel – where you carry only what fits in a bag – reframed her relationship to possessions and worked as a biographical rupture that catalyzed practice change.

PARAGRAPH #AB5XLD
  "Es labāk šobrīd lēnā garā atbrīvojos... man nav vienkārši žēl paņemt somu un aizbraukt." [I'd rather let go of things slowly now… I just don't want it to be hard to pick up a bag and leave.] The war anxiety dimension: she is releasing things partly because she wants to be able to leave quickly if necessary. The geopolitical context of Latvia – proximity to Russia, uncertainty since 2022 – appears explicitly in her divestment motivation.

PARAGRAPH #LG8X4N
  "Pieķeršanās jautājums tiek risināts. Viņš ir procesā." [The question of attachment is being worked on. It's in process.] "Brīvbode palīdz, tā teikt, šim procesam attīstīties." [Brīvbode helps, so to speak, this process to develop.] "Šobrīd jau ir uz robežas, tāpēc es saku, ka ir jāatvadās jau no tā, kas jau ir atrasts." [I'm already at the edge now, that's why I say one has to start saying goodbye even to what one has already found.] Māra is explicitly working on her attachment to things – she names it as a problem and frames it as ongoing work. Brīvbode as a tool for developing the capacity to let go. This is the freeshop as infrastructure for a personal practice of detachment. It is a positive framing of the same phenomenon that Rasa describes as generating excess – from Māra's perspective, having a route makes it easier to release.

PARAGRAPH #WABKA8
  Brīvbode as material infrastructure enabling the practice of letting go. The freeshop does not just receive things; it creates conditions that make divestment possible for people who otherwise could not do it. This is the role of material arrangement in sustaining practice.

PARAGRAPH #35KR5F
  the practice of divestment requires competencies that include emotional regulation and the capacity to detach from objects. Māra is developing these competencies deliberately.

SECTION #W2WRDC What People Find Here: Plural Meanings of Acquisition

PARAGRAPH #5L3QYB
  Taking things in Brīvbode is sustained by a variety of meanings that do not need to be shared or mutually coherent across practitioners. The heterogeneity of meanings allows the practice to recruit across a wide and socially diverse public. The following section examines the main meaning clusters and what each reveals about how the practice recruits and retains its carriers – what do people experience as useful and rewarding when they opt to take things in Brīvbode.

PARAGRAPH #54GE84
  For Marija, the primary meaning is access and dignity as Brīvbode enables a form of self-presentation beyond her regular means: "I dressed like an absolute princess. You can’t even find things like that in a shop." She takes pleasure in the secret source as other people in her networks cannot tell the difference between her clothing originating from Brīvbode or retail. This also has a competence dimension: knowing where to look, when to come, having access to a source others do not use.

PARAGRAPH #NMQ6KB
  Anna frames her participation with a desire for aesthetic autonomy: “I've always really disliked it when I'm wearing something and someone else is wearing exactly the same." Instead of sustainability or thrift, this meaning is based on distinctiveness. Anna also has a sewing competency that works as an extension of the same desire – making her own clothing is the ultimate guarantee of uniqueness: the competency of sewing is sustained by the meaning. Additionally Brīvbode also enables Anna's daily performance of festivity: wearing a glitter dress as everyday wear is possible because Brīvbode provides a low-stakes supply resource.

PARAGRAPH #N2JHPC
  Elīna describes a similar dynamic at a lower threshold of commitment: “You can try out different styles for free. I took a bomber jacket I would never have bought myself." The jacket became one of her most-worn items. Brīvbode enabled a style experiment that she would not have risked financially. Similarly, a practitioner who was exploring cross-dressing also described: "What gives me joy is that I can create different characters from those clothes. For example, yesterday I went to my first cross-dresser date with this beautiful purple wig. I also got these court shoes... And that somehow challenged me to put them to use."

PARAGRAPH #D4H3PB
  Madara’s participation is organised around her craftsperson's gaze – a competency that allows her to notice objects as made of particular components and materials. "When I see an item, I see it not just as a finished garment, but also, for example, as a material – fabric, beads, zippers." This competency distinguishes her participation from others and allows her to find value also in objects that other people might not find useful at all: "I found an old, cut mosquito net, which I use as a base for embroidery." Something that appeared to be waste turned out to be a useful resource to her. This is a heightened version of the right-owner logic – the object finds not just a user but a user who recognizes a value in it that is largely invisible to others. Also Madara’s rugmaking practice originated in having accumulated too many secondhand clothes – material surplus became the origin of a new practice.

PARAGRAPH #VGRDGV
  The craftsperson's gaze has a negative counterpart, however, when it is decoupled from valuing items as a shared resource: some visitors treat the shop as a source of free raw materials, cutting off buttons or zippers from garments, and leaving the damaged items behind – extracting the value themselves while diminishing it for everyone else.

PARAGRAPH #RQ88U2
  While alternative, these meanings simultaneously overlap with some of the meanings present in capitalist consumption –

PARAGRAPH #86WW2X
  Alongside the meanings of novelty, originality and access is the meaning of class related stigma, and its presence significantly affects the practice’s recruitability. Some participants hinted at it subtly in conversation, but denied it when asked about it directly. Marija is the only one who explicitly named the shame associated with freecycling, and this cuts against any simple narrative of freecycling as normalized exchange practice for people of all walks of life. While actively and regularly using Brīvbode and also praising the things she has managed to acquire as high quality and aesthetically pleasing, nevertheless, she also compares taking from Brīvbode to going through someone else’s trash. Especially when a TV crew came to Brīvbode and a journalist approached her for a couple of words, she flatly refused “I will not let them see that I've fallen so low as to come to Brīvbode." Yet in the same conversation she also reclaims the class label: "I'm common, simply common (prasta – common, plain, I.L.). I will go and get what I need." The value is privately experienced, but restricted in representation.

PARAGRAPH #ZEVQDB
  For some potential practitioners this association with lower class status is a barrier to entry, while others manage it strategically. Several participants mentioned withholding information about the origin of items, especially when passing things acquired in Brīvbode to other people as gifts. As volunteer Anna noted, grandmothers say: “I don't tell my daughter where I got that jacket, because she wouldn't take it.”

PARAGRAPH #Z4WUR2
  A related strong negative meaning for second hand acquisition holds that these items carry the energy of previous – often deceased – owners. Several participants mentioned this trope but adjusted it to their practice. Viesturs, half-laughing, keeps the spiritual language but reframes it institutionally: "Others say that things have some kind of energy, or the aura of previous owners... We're able to transform that. In a way, Brīvbode is also like a kind of purgatory for things." With this adjusted meaning Brīvbode can function as a threshold space in the object biographies where the weight of previous owners can be released.

PARAGRAPH #MD2XMJ
  This stigma of second hand acquisition is, however, also generationally uneven and appears to be dissolving, similar to patterns reported elsewhere (Gurova, 2024). Changing meanings are shifting the practice’s recruitability. Madara notes how a broader normalization of secondhand acquisition in recent years has produced a shift within her own family, who previously held strong norms against it. Luīze, a highschooler preparing for graduation, uses the English word "thrift shops" to talk about her consumption practices, frames her participation in explicit environmental terms, and reports that her classmates are actively seeking secondhand options for graduation dresses. She attributes the negative meaning her parents hold towards second hand acquisition to “Soviet mentality”.

SECTION #GTJY22 Quiet or Reflected Sustainability?

PARAGRAPH #T6FW9N
  In our conversation, Viesturs also positions Brīvbode against charity but from a different angle than Rasa: "Our goal is not to do good for people, I think. Our goal is to do good for the planet… Charity is always related to the meaning of poverty. I think that we need to emphasize the fun factor, the joy factor – swapping, changing clothes. That it's cool, fun, that it's joyful." He is not only describing the meanings that sustain his own participation, but also making a claim about which meanings should be foregrounded to recruit and retain more practitioners. This orientation is present in Brīvbode and practically expressed through organising photo shoots and parties, encouraging playfulness with clothing.

PARAGRAPH #LUDRGT
  When I ask Viesturs if he sees working in Brīvbode as helping visitors or helping a cause, the question turns out to be beside the point: "To me it's so natural now, I don't evaluate it anymore. Others should evaluate it. It's simply a thing I do, without going into philosophical meanings." Sorting, switching clothing, chatting with visitors and attending to the shop so that it continues operating well – have become sufficiently routinised for him that they no longer require justification or meaning-work. The practice has stabilized to the point where the question of what it means has receded behind the doing.

PARAGRAPH #M9983A
  Rasa answers similarly when I enquire about the environmental and sustainability aspects of Brīvbode: “Everything else is so intense… It has remained somehow, in a way, a little secondary." While the sustainability framing remains present – and is foregrounded e.g. when writing project funding applications or designing info materials – it does not need to be actively held by every practitioner in every performance. For both Viesturs and Rasa philosophical meaning-making has receded. This is what Smith and Jehlička (2013) describe as quiet sustainability: practices that produce sustainable outcomes without requiring their practitioners to hold or articulate sustainability as a motivation.

PARAGRAPH #CX2SM8
  Sustainability as a meaning is present for practitioners, and e.g. Luīze is at the other end of the spectrum for whom it is expressed as primary rather than peripheral. She explicitly framed her participation in terms of ecological responsibility and the wider politics of avoiding fast fashion and microtrends.

PARAGRAPH #78HBEQ
  Līva discussed how the environmental meaning is present for her, but in tension with her actual acquisition practices. She identifies textile consumption as probably one of her most environmentally problematic behaviors, yet was open that knowing it does not resolve it. She estimates she buys an item of clothing every month and frames this as more than she used to in adolescence. The meanings she uses to evaluate her consumption patterns are in tension with the meanings that sustain the acquisition, and neither cancels the other one out. Researching household textile disposal, Sigaard (2026) concludes that even while sustainable consumption is ideally endorsed, disposal is very normalized because it is strongly embedded in identity work, relational considerations and in facilitating other practices.

PARAGRAPH #P6X2DJ
  Also, as I argue, most participants come to Brīvbode for practical and social reasons instead of self-professed environmental conviction. This resonates with Smith and Jehlička’s (2013) concept of quiet sustainability, developed through their research on Czech urban gardeners: sustainable practices that can be widespread and effective but are not articulated in terms of sustainability by their practitioners. Smith and Jehlička contend that quiet sustainability is defined by practices “that result in beneficial environmental or social outcomes, that do not relate directly or indirectly to market transactions, and that are not represented by the practitioners as relating directly to environmental or sustainability goals. Cultures of sharing, repairing, gifting and bartering characterise quiet sustainability” (2013: 155). Latvia provides a productive context for this concept – several participants trace their orientations towards reuse and frugality to generational experience rather than sustainability aspiration. [..]

PARAGRAPH #FLSHWG
  Some participants do find meanings for their participation in explicit sustainability terms, though, and this difference should not be overlooked. The thesis holds both the quiet and the articulated dimensions without collapsing them into a single category, treating the variation between them as empirically interesting. In practice-theoretical terms, however, what practitioners say about why they do what they do is only one element of practice and “doings” hold the centre.

PARAGRAPH #SY28Z3
  (Lifestyles of Enough) “Finally, the meanings attached to sufficiency-oriented consumption practices go way beyond altruistic motives like environmental concern. As a study by Kropfeld et al. (2018) showed, environmentally concerned consumers (with more altruistic motives) have a higher environmental impact than voluntary simplifiers (with more self-related motives). Personal or egocentric motives, therefore, can lead to sufficiency-oriented behavior, as the example for sharing services from this review showed. This is in line with Sandberg’s (2021) findings on sufficiency practices related to miscellaneous consumption, as she connects a reduction of consumption of various products (incl. clothing) to anti-consumption lifestyles such as voluntary simplicity or frugality.

PARAGRAPH #JDEYZH
  Quiet sustainability – sustainable practices without added sustainability meaning.

PARAGRAPH #Q9T2SN
  what matters in sustainability? e.g. people gather egg cartons because it is easy, but issues that are more impactful and require more resources are more difficult to enact.

PARAGRAPH #8B2Y8N
  Several participants in this study trace their orientations toward thrift and reuse to generational experience of the scarcity of the early post-Soviet period, or to upbringings in which resources were used carefully as a matter of practical necessity rather than environmental commitment.

PARAGRAPH #VFPYU2
  The “activists” are part of the visitors, yet a large part do not frame their participation in Brīvbode primarily in environmental terms: they come because they have things to give away, because they sometimes find things they need. Their practices have sustainable dimensions that they do not necessarily name or claim.

PARAGRAPH #V445EY
  This framing does not require flattening the diversity of participant orientations. Some visitors do articulate explicit sustainability motivations – concerns about fast fashion, about waste, about the environmental costs of overconsumption. The thesis holds both the quiet and the articulated dimensions without forcing them into a single category, and treats the tension between them as empirically interesting rather than theoretically problematic. One question that remains open is whether explicit articulation makes sustainable practices more effective at retaining practitioners – more resistant to disruption when material or social conditions change. This is beyond the scope of the present study but worth noting as a direction for future research.

PARAGRAPH #FV3V4W
  Māra: "Mammai to lietu nebija daudz, un tās lietas tika visas, nu, ļoti labi uzturētas. Bet tad, kad jau parādījās tie humāno preču veikali, tad savukārt bija otrā drusku galējība." [My mother didn't have many things, and those things were all, well, very well looked after. But then, once the second-hand goods shops (humāno preču veikali, lit. "humanitarian goods shops") appeared, the other extreme came.]

SECTION #A3X9XX Conclusion: Holding Together Incompatible Orientations

PARAGRAPH #M3VCHH
  Freecycling in Brīvbode is sustained by a plurality of meanings that are compatible enough to coexist within the same space. Givers come to resolve the moral weight of unwanted things, the site’s permanence and visibility offer a trusted route for it. Takers come for dignity, experimentation, craft materials, social contact or simple convenience. The moral economy of exchange holds these heterogenous orientations together, as it is actively maintained against the pressure of resellers, heavy takers and people looking for charity, yet flexible enough to accommodate them when the alternative is overflow.

PARAGRAPH #4V448P
  Sustainability can be an outcome without it being a requirement and a conscious orientation for practitioners. The practice recruits and retains carriers through meanings that also have little to do with environmental concern and yet the circulation it enables has sustainable dimensions that persist regardless of how participants frame their involvement.

PARAGRAPH #MHM9Q5
  This does not resolve the tension running through the chapter of Brīvbode functioning simultaneously as a moral circularity infrastructure embodying an alternative value regime of exchange and responsible material life – and as a low threshold overflow channel that absorbs the surplus generated by the consumption patterns it aspires to counter. This tension just reflects the observed dynamic of how sustainable practices are embedded in contemporary life.

THESIS #FYG32U
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #3X7JKL The circulation of things and things that sustain it

PARAGRAPH #E3QN63
  This chapter examines freecycling practice and how it is constituted by its physical venue and the materials flowing through it, the meanings that recruit and retain participants and the competencies that order the exchange processes in Brīvbode. Throughout the chapter I move between analysis of freecycling as practice-entity and the level of individual performances of freecycling as performed, especially attending to moments of friction and tension where the two pull against each other.

PARAGRAPH #QZ8Q4K
  The chapter follows the trajectory of things moving through Brīvbode. It begins with the incoming flow: how and in what cases people divest from their households, how meanings shape what arrives, and how Brīvbode is positioned among other possible divestment routes. It turns to the site itself and the material and infrastructural elements that sustain the practice, and how overflow is managed, including competencies of handling norms on the site. From there it turns to the plurality of meanings sustaining acquisition: how participants experience Brīvbode as useful for acquisition and how the non-monetary context shapes the giving and taking. The chapter closes with a consideration of participant orientation towards freecycling as a sustainability practice.

SECTION #M45HLW Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home

PARAGRAPH #GXDTQG
  The material outcome of one practice present in Brīvbode (domestic divestment: things arrive) is a direct resource for another (sequential acquisition: things are taken), sustaining the circularity between different households and the freeshop. Instead of starting at the “shop”, freecycling in Brīvbode can be viewed as starting with the outward flow of things no longer needed or wanted in the household and the question of what to do with them. The practice of managing this flow (what Počinkova et al. (2023) call voluntary disposal) is what brings most givers to Brīvbode. The swapshop offers them an opportunity for circulating materials as well as a way of managing attachment and detachment from things. Brīvbode is one node in the available infrastructure of divestment, and is distinguished from others by what it means to route things through it.

PARAGRAPH #S5FWGM
  Noting how meanings migrate across practices, Shove et al. (2012) mention how thrift, for example, is no longer expressed through darning socks at home – now a rather rare practice – but has moved, as Gregson (2007) shows, into methods and styles of disposal and divestment. Divesting responsibly has become one of the ways people sustain and recreate identity in relation to their things.

PARAGRAPH #BGYXVM
  The ideal encouraged by the organisers in Brīvbode is for participants to both give and take, yet the two roles do not always recruit the same carriers or sustain participation through the same meanings. Giving in Brīvbode is typically more structured by the motives of givers rather than by the needs of the receivers. Giving contributes to a stock of the swapshop and is shaped by the givers’ assessments of their sense of responsibility toward still-usable objects (too good to throw away), hopes for things finding new trajectories with other carriers, and their capacity to manage the work of getting rid of things well. The practice is donor-driven, and things arriving reflect more the rhythms and pressures of household life, and coordination with receivers’ needs is only indirect.

PARAGRAPH #FN9Y53
  Divestment in Brīvbode is distributed across time unevenly and concentrated around rhythms of domestic material arrangements and particular life events. People typically bring things in batches – no longer wanted items are set aside and accumulate at home until, e.g. a bag is full and is then divested to Brīvbode.

PARAGRAPH #FPHE4J
  Moving home, renovation, seasonal clearing, and sorting through a deceased relative’s belongings generate larger pulses of divestment. Participants described sorting through an entire previous owner’s life when buying a flat, routing things to Brīvbode and to friends when downsizing, helping relatives to divest after moving home.

PARAGRAPH #AZ2L4J
  The size of the home is a very constitutive material element for divestment as smaller living spaces generate a more immediate need to move things out in order to fulfill, for example, the ideal of an uncluttered home – this requires both strong competency for managing household material streams and established divestment routes for what must leave. Brīvbode functions as one such route.

PARAGRAPH #LGE48Z
  The ideal of a decluttered home functions both as cultural script and as embodied relief. Gundega puts on tidying consultant TV shows when she sorts at home, though the volume of advice tends to produce anxiety rather than clarity – no one person can remember it all. Viesturs is more pragmatic about decluttering methods: "I sense there are all sorts of methods and things, but it all seems like a luxury problem to me. Although maybe we should promote something like that – users of those methods would definitely supply us with better quality content."

PARAGRAPH #9XUQEC
  The act of bringing things to Brīvbode performs moral work that throwing away does not – it can relieve guilt of having acquired unnecessarily, maintain the identity of a responsible consumer, and transfer some of the responsibility for what happens next to the swapshop. Divesting well and finding a route that feels appropriate to the object's remaining value is itself a practice with normative dimensions: there are right and wrong ways to let things go, and Brīvbode offers one of the right ways.

PARAGRAPH #WWSZA8
  Participants who divest in Brīvbode mentioned the non-transparency of the textile container system in comparison to the freeshop. Both routes offer removal and a presumed social good, but participants expressed particular satisfaction for witnessing circulation in Brīvbode – moments when they saw someone taking the items they brought. Although giving and taking are decoupled and mediated by the swapshop, participants can sometimes observe the circulation during their visits, a characteristic noted by many with a kind of quiet pleasure. The divestment is completed by seeing or knowing an item was taken, and this visibility closes the divestment cycle affectively. The opportunity for other visitors to access the materials is valued, while the textile collection management system is deemed too distanced to imagine who benefits.

PARAGRAPH #QPZXSP
  In absence of a specific receiver,

PARAGRAPH #LHMEDR
  while trying to negotiate the appropriate value and quality standards for the items circulated, givers construct a figure of a receiver, a meaning which shapes the practice from the giving side. Aiga describes her hope that a homeless person from the neighbourhoods of Ķengarags or Purvciems, someone in genuine need would use what she brings. This imagery expands what counts as worth passing on: objects that might be marginal by taste standards become appropriate if genuine need is the criterion, and the threshold for what counts as good enough shifts accordingly.

PARAGRAPH #R6NNGM
  The threshold of acceptability in Brīvbode is negotiated situationally, and this uncertainty can become a source of tension. Aiga described how she continues wearing clothing that is slightly pilled and normally uses dry food items past their expiry date – her own standards of what remains usable are linked to the meaning of genuine need but she cannot know in advance whether the items she brings to Brīvbode will be acknowledged as suitable. After receiving comments once about the quality of something she brought to Brīvbode, she prefers to not linger and leave her things quickly. The imagined receiver who accepts everything gives way to the real social encounter where standards are negotiated by someone else.

PARAGRAPH #R7549E
  The supply arriving in Brīvbode is shaped by these contested meanings – participant competencies of evaluating items as appropriate and the rhythms of domestic life. As such it is often unpredictable.

PARAGRAPH #PUVY95
  In reality, Brīvbode also functions as a divestment route for items that more regulated reuse channels would not accommodate: unfinished repair projects and textile fragments can sometimes be found, photographs and used magazines, not entirely complete jigsaw puzzles. Sometimes volunteers would remark that they already look for signs of wear and tear in suspicion about reasons an item has been brought to Brīvbode. They are aware that the swapshop can become a route of last resort for objects that are genuinely difficult to route elsewhere. What counts as acceptable and what counts as waste is decided through social judgment rather than formal criteria. I sometimes brought things in my backpack but ended up not taking them out as on second thought they seemed too worn or not suited.

PARAGRAPH #GGRHDF
  Fieldwork observations reveal different versions and scales of what counts as usable and worthy: I recall a collection of single-use sugar packages; a bundle of expired covid tests (I spent time unpacking the alcohol wipes and watched a woman take them); carefully washed plastic containers that were taken to the recycling bin after all (although the sour cream containers are useful in spring for growing plantings). A regular visitor brought coloured wire offcuts generated by her husband’s wireworking practice – she imagined someone who makes art or does craft work with children could be taking them, as they were never on the shelf anymore the next time she visited. Her husband generates surplus, she routes it to Brīvbode through her domestic management, an unknown hypothetical third person absorbs it into their own. The trajectory is sustained by an imagined right-owner who may not exist, and the volunteers did not have the heart to tell her the bags of small plastic pieces were not used that way.

PARAGRAPH #QDFKGX
  Yet unpredictability of supply works both ways – e.g. the same giver who took extra effort to send Brīvbode a parcel with stained old plates that raised volunteer questions about the balance of invested energy for handling it, divested a bag full of colourful folk-style knitted mittens another time – laid out on the table, those attracted many visitors’ attention with shared beauty. This uncertainty of supply is itself part of what sustains participant engagement with the practice through meanings of “serendipity” and magic moments of unexpected “good catch”.

PARAGRAPH #YEPTVU
  The same logic that makes divestment easy also can make Brīvbode available as a pressure valve. Fast fashion sometimes arrives with tags still attached; one participant brought clothing she had purchased online – after it did not fit she arranged a return, and was told by the company to donate it rather than send it back – the retailer in this case is routing their surplus to volunteers to manage.

PARAGRAPH #QT3B9B
  Divestment is normalised and sought after. As Brīvbode manager Rasa observed: "Often we're simply a place to dump it all and go buy new things."  In this view, Brīvbode appears as evidence of the structural conditions it aspires to address rather than a solution to them. There is tension present in Brīvbode between the swapshop as an alternative caring system and as a low-threshold overflow channel, and this tension does not resolve easily.

SECTION #WY6KPH Managing the flow on site

PARAGRAPH #ALYNWW
  On Thursdays and Fridays a queue often forms by Brīvbode before noon – sometimes more than ten people wait to be let in. The first two hours are the busiest. Rasa sometimes takes a breath before unlocking the door: "It begins."

PARAGRAPH #2YWFSM
  After an item is divested to Brīvbode, it does not belong to the donor anymore, it belongs to the swapshop. This transfer of ownership is actively managed: takers are discouraged from taking things from the sorting table before they are processed, as their enthusiasm has caused discomfort to other visitors in the past.

PARAGRAPH #TVPES3
  However, sorting is done “on the spot” and in the same room, and things move fast. As Larsen (2023) observes, in thrift shops, practices are often characterized by a "reversal" of standard economic logic, where the goal is to move things along as quickly as possible rather than to maximize the profit per individual item. This can also be said about Brīvbode – there’s excitement about things moving quickly.

SECTION #C2AQ4D Material elements in Brīvbode: the physical site and infrastructure

PARAGRAPH #Z48STM
  Physical instead of virtual co-presence shapes the quality of encounters between people and objects. As Tan and Yeoh  (2024), writing about freecycling markets in Singapore, observe, “relational-material exchanges play out better as an embodied co-presence with others/things” – objects can be handled, tried on and assessed, and an item of decent quality will eventually find a taker.

PARAGRAPH #YLHWNT
  The physicality and permanence of Brīvbode as a site is one of the main attributes setting it apart from other similar initiatives that often struggle with availability of affordable rental space, especially in high density urban areas. Tan and Yeoh (2024) note how, because of this reason, organisers of Singapore markets must bin or redistribute excess items after every event. They identify availability of rental and storage space as one of the main pre-requisites for functioning freecycling initiatives – thus it is important to note how regular operation in the same physical venue constitutes the practice of freecycling, as it becomes a stable and recurring weekly infrastructure for participants. This enables visitors to sustain a regular visiting rhythm through which, for many of them, freecycling becomes genuinely embedded in everyday life.

PARAGRAPH #T7BS4V
  The space in Brīvbode is organised and decorated to resemble a retail environment with a DIY aesthetic –  with hangers and shelves, and garments sometimes arranged by colour in the manner of the formerly operating secondhand chain Degas. The aesthetic is not fixed, however, as curatorial disagreements exist over the best presentation and each shift can leave its own curatorial mark. Rasa describes the tension between celebrating volunteer initiative and an aesthetic that, in her view, would communicate more value through similarity to a retail environment, leaving more space between things, signifying that quality items can be found in Brīvbode. "The emptier the shelves, the more people find," she notes. A different aesthetic displaying abundance of things on offer and decorating with plushies appeals to another volunteer. These mundane disagreements hold competing views about which meanings the practice of freecycling should enact. Material and meaning elements of the practice are not settled but are actively contested through performance.

PARAGRAPH #PU3CKA
  The regularity of operation that the physical on-site format allows also fosters social contact among participants. Opening hours twice per week is both a way to manage the necessary volunteer labour and a social encounter catalyst – temporal tightening means that visitors are more likely to encounter each other. The volunteer in charge of the shift anchors the social experience, and the personal relationships accumulate over repeated visits. "On Thursdays everyone asks where Nadja is. And on Fridays everyone asks where Viesturs is." While Brīvbode is not a primary site for socialisation for most participants, regular visitors, especially those living in single person households, noted the meaningfulness of the social aspect of visiting, the casual contact with known “faces”, Brīvbode being a place to go and the visits giving a structure to the week.

PARAGRAPH #HZZ52R
  Within the material realm, Brīvbode is also embedded in and dependent upon broader infrastructural arrangements in order to manage the overflow it cannot absorb. The swapshop passes leftover textiles – in some estimates up to 30 % of the received flow (Akule et al. 2023) – to textile collection containers. The shop would not be viable if it had to cover the costs of regular unsorted waste collection. Also, off-season clothing such as winter coats that take a lot of space are stored in collaboration with charity organisations that have access to larger storage premises. Brīvbode can sustain – in a pragmatic, improvised manner – because of this material entanglement instead of trying to resolve the full material cycle on its own.

PARAGRAPH #EP6U2C
  The physical experience of overflow is a constant of volunteering, and bags often arrive faster than they can be processed. Often my task during shifts was to sort and put out children’s items. The boxes were already full, with piles forming, when I asked Rasa: 'Don't you feel like the things are just pouring down on you?' 'Yes, that's why I no longer have any tolerance for things. I realise I feel relief that these clothes are dirty, because there simply isn't any more space."

PARAGRAPH #AUZKM4
  During another shift, Rasa offered me a handmade black ceramic plate someone had brought that day. I was glad to take it, but before my departure confusion arose about where it had gone. It turned out, more stuff had piled up on top of it on the sorting table as visitors kept coming with their divestment. Rasa laughed: “This is how it is here.” As a material site, Brīvbode is an active flow that requires tending and occasionally swallows its own offerings.

PARAGRAPH #DZ72UL
  The pull of Brīvbode as a divestment destination persists even when the physical site is temporarily absent. For several weeks after the Brīvbode pop-up venue in Āgenskalns closed at the end of summer 2021, people kept bringing boxes and bags of belongings, leaving them in front of the empty shop. The practice had recruited carriers so effectively that the site’s closure did not interrupt the flow.

PARAGRAPH #BW6UMW
  The things are made visible by being put in the shop. It makes the material overflow more visible – there is no “away” to throw your things.

SECTION #FUQJQ5 Circulation norms and competencies

PARAGRAPH #C6YRCL
  The material composition of Brīvbode reflects the gendered organisation of (clothing) consumption more broadly. The majority of items circulating through the freeshop are women’s and children’s clothing – a pattern that mirrors the more feminised character of household consumption management. As noted in the methodology chapter, men do participate in Brīvbode, but on a lesser scale and with different practice career tendencies – while men’s clothing is sought after, they also look for books to circulate in second hand markets, CD’s, electronics.

PARAGRAPH #WVZQRH
  The gendered asymmetry extends to the competencies required to manage the space. Viesturs described his initial challenge of developing a workable system for sorting women’s clothing after he started volunteering: "Well, f*ck, look, where do I put it. Trying to systematize women’s clothing, it’s like a tree with many branches." The competence of sorting – especially women’s clothing as in this case – is not self-evident as the proliferation of categories resists simple organisation and has to be worked out through practice.

PARAGRAPH #LXRLTL
  The standards applied to men’s clothing also operate differently. There is simply less of it, and the threshold for what is acceptable is lower – men’s clothing is assumed to be used for physical work and is assessed accordingly. One day two young women looking through the clothing boxes for film costumes picked up an undershirt and commented on how disgusting it was, while a man right next to them took it. Rasa later confirmed the shirt was not in a good condition, but she had put it out because, as she noted, everything gets taken from the men’s section. The norms of assessment reflect whose consumption practices the swapshop is organised around.

PARAGRAPH #QY9B8B
  While there are explicit written rules governing exchange in Brīvbode, those are framed in general relational terms – “bring things that would bring joy to someone; bring things you would give to a friend” – and there are no formal categories of exclusion. Norms regarding acceptability are defined and enacted situationally and relationally, which can be both a strength and a source of friction about where the boundaries lie.

PARAGRAPH #9X74TE
  Being in Brīvbode is characterized by constant sorting decisions, trying to maintain an acceptable level of presentation and quality of items. The work of maintaining quality and the work of maintaining relationships sometimes pull in different directions, and the balance between lenience and care is negotiated in every shift. At times I heard people felt uneasy about Viesturs openly commenting on things they had brought.

PARAGRAPH #WUN97C
  This is observable even in the circulation of food items, which, although not central, are also present in Brīvbode. As opposed to many community-based exchange initiatives where the circulation of food is governed strictly, e.g. accepting only unopened items and carefully monitoring expiration dates, in Brīvbode the circulation is shaped less by formal regulation and more by trust and familiarity among participants. Open packages may be accepted when brought by known visitors, suggesting that assessments of safety and acceptability are negotiated socially.

PARAGRAPH #US7AXR
  A stronger boundary emerges in relation to certain categories of items, such as medicine. In one instance, a regular visitor brought various medications, explaining their uses to the day manager. While the items were initially placed on the table for taking, a while later another worker quietly removed them, remarking to me, “I don’t think I support this.” The removal was not communicated directly to the donor, suggesting a reluctance to enforce the norm explicitly. Instead of a formal refusal, workers might suggest that perhaps the giver has not noticed the defects, but items could be washed and brought back or simply delay decisions until the giver is no longer present.

PARAGRAPH #ZC2Z2F
  "Man kaut kā mazāka vēlme ņemt visu, ko es redzu, par spīti tam, ka tas it kā ir tas 'brīv'... es kaut kā vairāk cienu to visu, kas tur ir izlikts." Madara explicitly contrasts her response to freeness with others' – she imagines the hoarder who grabs because it's free, and positions herself as someone for whom freeness activates restraint rather than acquisition. This is the moral economy of freeshopping from the perspective of someone still in the early stages of learning the practice's norms. "Kādam varbūt tas 'brīv' rada vēlme, ka viss ir bez maksas, tagad ņemam, ņemam, ņemam. Man tas nospēlē kaut kā tieši otrādāk." "Es to uztveru kā apmaiņu. To vārdu 'brīvu' kaut kā izslēdzu... Sākumā tas tā bišķiņ mulsināja, ka esmu kā apzagusies." This is competency acquisition: Madara is learning how to understand and inhabit the value regime of Brīvbode, and she narrates the process explicitly.

PARAGRAPH #JXSMQW
  Competencies of Circulation

PARAGRAPH #YNMVCK
  The competencies associated with freecycling are not skills in the most traditional sense – freecycling does not require years of training. They are largely social and evaluatiove: knowing how to read quality, when to come –

PARAGRAPH #D33QL7
  No studentes lauka darba: “Rasa ir visuztrenētākā acs uz mantu kvalitāti; arī izvēloties mantas – visbiežāk apģērbu – ir konkrēti kritēriji, kam sekot, piemēram materiāla biezums vai veids (vilna, kašmirs u.c.). Īsāk sakot – kas ir dabai draudzīgāks, ekoloģiskāks un ilgmūžīgāks.”

PARAGRAPH #B66BK3
  On the acquisition side, competency is equally real: knowing when to come, how to navigate the space, how to read what is new. Agate has mapped the visitor typology and times her arrivals strategically. Finding things in Brīvbode rewards the person who comes regularly, builds familiarity with the stock, and returns when something new has arrived. Repeated visiting. Marta describes starting from the first room and returning when there is already something new.

PARAGRAPH #VG295X
  Cleaning and preparing: things brought to Brīvbode are expected to be clean and in reasonable condition. This means washing, checking for stains, sometimes minor repair. Sometimes people don’t wash – e.g. Marija expects the recipient to do it. Anna mentions she never divests anything that has been repaired.

PARAGRAPH #9LRKLZ
  Sorting and evaluating: deciding what to bring requires going through possessions, assessing condition, quality, suitability.

PARAGRAPH #GWTLZ7
  Material literacy – knowing what wool or silk feels like (often with composition labels missing), recognizing a well-made garment, spotting a hidden stain.

PARAGRAPH #JH9JK9
  Skill evaluation things – Laura describes herself as a talented secondhand user who checks everything carefully – but she also has taken things in Brīvbode that have turned out broken later.

PARAGRAPH #UBWP9G
  Knowing what you need and what you already have. Zane's phone list of things she is looking for, her stylist consultations as an investment in knowing her own preferences – this is the work of self-knowledge in service of not acquiring wrongly. Without it, acquisition becomes impulsive and the divestment work follows.

PARAGRAPH #Q2A66G
  Matching to existing possessions. Agate explicitly asks herself whether she could combine this with her other clothes, whether she will actually wear it. This is cognitive work – holding a mental model of your wardrobe and household while browsing.

PARAGRAPH #7AQN26
  “on material literacy, meaning the skills and knowledge about different materials, how durable they are and with what treatment they last longest. This includes knowledge about appropriate washing, storing (Figures 2 and 3) and other care techniques like using a lint shaver or an iron.”

SECTION #QLVPVE Meanings: the moral economy of exchange

PARAGRAPH #VJU6JZ
  Practices have normative meanings – understandings upheld about what correct participation looks like, what the practice is for, and who belongs in it. In Brīvbode, normative work is done by organisers to uphold the meaning of the freecycling as an exchange as opposed to a charity. This framing is a normative aspiration – a claim about who belongs and on what terms, actively maintained against pressure from resellers and heavy-takers. The normative aspiration is held together by a moral vocabulary of equality and reciprocity – the norm that participants bring something or at least contribute in kind or offer their help at the shop is part of what defines active participation in the practice rather than use of a service. This positioning work is felt as particularly needed by organisers also because Brīvbode is located in the neighbourhood of Gaiziņš night shelter.

PARAGRAPH #ETSGMU
  As Rasa puts it: “Exchange is a very honest way of operating, it requires responsibility from both sides. When both wealthy and poor, old and young can participate, and everyone knows it's on the basis of exchange, that you are equal, nobody gets a discount, nobody is more special. To many people we simply say: “We are not a charity. It's not the case that you come and now demand that you need clean trousers. We are not a charity point, this is an exchange point. Do you actually have something with you for exchange, before you start setting the rules here?” Nadja is very good at negotiating this. “Go to the Red Cross, go to other places that are specifically a charitable institution! We are not a help institution.””

PARAGRAPH #B3A7P8
  Widlok’s (2017) analysis of give boxes – small scale unattended exchange infrastructure in a German town – offers a frame for what the non-monetary arrangement achieves socially. Give boxes, he argues, separate the acts of giving and receiving – donors and recipients do not need to interact directly, and the intermediary space absorbs the social awkwardness of charity. Items move quickly, suggesting ongoing demand, while participants tend to frame their involvement in terms of giving even when they primarily take.

PARAGRAPH #AC8LX9
  Brīvbode operates on a similar logic: the physical space mediates between participants, making it possible to take without performing need. At the same time, Widlok notes that give boxes are not straightforwardly sharing practices – they tend to be understood within a moral register of charity or almsgiving rather than open-ended reciprocity, and tensions arise when participants extract items for resale rather than use.

PARAGRAPH #8Q8FJL
  The imperative to keep things flowing to avoid overflow creates a certain tolerance in case of suspicion for such practices that formally fall outside Brīvbode’s rules. Reselling is not allowed, yet resellers are a suspected presence in Brīvbode. Volunteers mentioned situations when other visitors in Brīvbode have told them they have recognized their divested items at the Āgenskalns flea market the following weekend, which Rasa acknowledges as straightforwardly unpleasant. Yet because it is not always possible to prove, there is also a working accommodation, and Rasa’s position is one of pragmatic acceptance: “At the same time it seems – if he'll find the next user for the thing anyway, the function is fulfilled. Better they make a little money and the thing finds its person, than some hoarder takes it and the things end up in a container." She laughs: "Well, what choice do I have but to believe… We support small businesses."

PARAGRAPH #MB7WW5
  This reveals a hierarchy of meanings operating within Brīvbode’s moral economy. The object’s arrival to a sequential user is weighed as more important than the forbidden monetary transaction that may or may not occur along the way. The ethos of non-monetary exchange can be subordinated to the deeper logic of circulation. Besides, if visitors come with something in return, further trajectory is difficult to control.

PARAGRAPH #VZMVZA
  Viesturs frames this ecologically: "Well, I could see them now as forest sanitarians." Without moral approval, the resellers, the hoarders and heavy-takers are reframed as functional elements as they clear out the accumulation of materials that would otherwise clog the space. Viesturs response to this is tactical curatorial competency: if a person he suspects is present at the shop, he often doesn’t put new items out on the shelves until they leave. This is his practical judgement and competency to “read the room” enacted situationally.

SECTION #V753D5 Non-monetary exchange and attachment: competencies of letting go

PARAGRAPH #G5UMDM
  The intensity of circulation of items in Brīvbode and its non-monetary context raise a question about the relationship between price and attachment. Evans’s (2020) framework suggests that attachment is produced through the acquisition-side moments of consumption – appropriation and appreciation, processes that are normally anchored by monetary investment. Assima et al. (2023) describe "financial myopia" – the difficulty of detaching from items one has spent significant money on, even when they are no longer used. This results in "neglected possessions" accumulating in wardrobes as disposal is deferred to avoid the feeling of wasting a significant investment.

PARAGRAPH #4ALAE2
  The anchor of monetary investment is absent from acquisition in Brīvbode, and some participants articulate the shift in their own relationship to objects directly. Rasa describes how price normally operates as a binding force which Brīvbode alleviates: “You no longer have that heaviness around a thing – I bought it for €40, how can I now throw it out or give it away, not wear it. Now it's simply: if it doesn't suit, bring it back. Try it – it works, or it doesn't. It's much more free." She is pragmatic about this beyond Brīvbode too: “No matter where the garment comes from, there is that percentage of things I take or buy or acquire for myself that I always know won't get worn regardless of whether I've paid money for them or not. So the safest thing to do is to invest as little as possible, so that afterwards there are fewer regrets." This is a recalibration of what kinds of commitment acquisition is.

PARAGRAPH #HXZYR8
  Fieldwork observations capture this in the dynamic of circulation. A woman arrives and leaves in different shoes than she came in: “I left mine here instead. Today with these trousers, the high heel doesn't suit. Hopefully no fungus..." Another laughs as she leaves her jacket in Brīvbode on a sunny day because she feels too hot: “I left home with clothes on but will be coming back in socks only. I don't need anything.” A third also swaps her jacket on the spot for one she prefers. The meaning of novelty comes across in these cases.

PARAGRAPH #UZH6RE
  Another aspect to the quality of attachment is the possibility of a return after trial and seeing whether attachment will form. It can be difficult to assess in the moment of acquisition whether an item will settle in person’s life. Bringing something back if it does not further loosens the relationship between taking and keeping, allowing a lower stakes and a more experimental participation. This trial opportunity was appreciated by participants whose physical attributes and body shapes are not always catered to in retail: "Because for a small person it's quite hard to find trousers... But here there's the opportunity to try them for some time and see."

PARAGRAPH #5YYBKM
  However, if acquisition carries less commitment, the same conditions that make divestment easier may make acquisition more frequent and less deliberate. My own divestment to Brīvbode often consists of things bought secondhand online as a preferred route of acquisition, but choosing not to invest effort in reselling when they don’t work out. The non-monetary regime does not automatically produce more careful consumption; its relationship to sufficiency depends on the meanings participants bring to it.

PARAGRAPH #H28B2Q
  Elīna describes feeling a sense of responsibility toward everything she acquires – whether bought secondhand, taken from a swap event, or found in Brīvbode. Once something has come to her, she feels obligated to find it a good next home rather than simply discard it: "If this has come to me, then this material... energy and work and transport went into producing it, and I can't just throw it away. I feel I have a duty to figure out how to pass it on to hands where it will be useful." She adds, however, that this sense of responsibility sometimes feels like too heavy a burden to carry.

PARAGRAPH #UM6BJY
  (Sometimes the relation to the shop is a source for jokes: “We have special mega discounts, 100 % – only today and tomorrow!”)

PARAGRAPH #MPQ4JQ
  The self-management work

PARAGRAPH #FJ79YF
  Managing the impulse to take because it is free. Marta describes this explicitly – learning to replace "free" with "exchange" in her mental vocabulary, developing the decision rule that if she is not sure she does not need it. This is deliberate self-regulation work, and it is not trivial. The non-monetary arrangement removes one natural brake on acquisition – financial cost – and participants who want to avoid accumulating must supply that brake themselves through conscious effort.

PARAGRAPH #8ZPRYC
  (moral economies of access and restraint)

PARAGRAPH #UYL6TZ
  "Man bija ļoti daudz dažādu veidu... pēdējos pāris gadus es kaut kā esmu no tā atkāvusies, ka es tā vairs nedaru. Es tiešām ļoti izvērtēju, vai man tā lieta tiešām ir nepieciešama." Madara describes a conscious shift away from impulse acquiring in secondhand contexts – she recognizes her own past behavior as a problem and has worked to change it. This is deliberate practice modification. Madara: “Es tiešām cenšos nebūt tā tante ar trīs maisiem, kas staigā katru dienu tur no vienas točkas uz otru. To es cenšos nepieļaut un cenšos arī sadraudzēties maksimāli ar tām lietām, kas man ir.” Making peace with what you have – sufficiency as an active practice of relationship with objects rather than deprivation. This is a positive formulation of sufficiency that does not rely on environmental discourse.

PARAGRAPH #VBVVXQ
  Elīna R. “S1: Bet kā tu nonāci pie tās sajūtas, pie tās atziņas – man jau pietiek? S2: Man vienkārši skapī vairs nav vietas. (smejas) Nu, arī, teiksim, tagad ir ziema, un ir džemperu laiks, un es saprotu, ka es tāpat neuzvelku visus savus džemperus. Nu, tātad man viņu ir acīmredzami par daudz. Un man arī patīk novalkāt lietas. Tur ir kaut kāds tāds, nu, man vismaz, īpašs tā kā kaifs, ka es ar šo lietu esmu tik daudz lietas darījusi kopā, ka viņa ir tik novalkāta, ka viņu, iespējams, pat vairs nevar salabot.”

PARAGRAPH #5JJ4KK
  "Es esmu krājēja. Jā, es esmu krājēja." Aiga recognised hoarding tendencies in herself. She links it to scarcity experience – not having had much as a student, learning to keep things because things were hard to come by. The accumulation habit is understood as a survival response to past material insecurity, but she is actively working to change. The turning point was a month-long solo trip through Europe after her employment ended: "Es aizbraucu, un tad ar to arī sākās, ka tagad, nu, tagad tas ir izdarīts, tagad ir jādomā kaut kas par lietām, kas ir par daudz." Travel – where you carry only what fits in a bag – reframed her relationship to possessions and worked as a biographical rupture that catalyzed practice change.

PARAGRAPH #KWQ7AQ
  "Es labāk šobrīd lēnā garā atbrīvojos... man nav vienkārši žēl paņemt somu un aizbraukt." The war anxiety dimension: she is releasing things partly because she wants to be able to leave quickly if necessary. The geopolitical context of Latvia – proximity to Russia, uncertainty since 2022 – appears explicitly in her divestment motivation.

PARAGRAPH #U575JS
  "Pieķeršanās jautājums tiek risināts. Viņš ir procesā." "Brīvbode palīdz, tā teikt, šim procesam attīstīties." "Šobrīd jau ir uz robežas, tāpēc es saku, ka ir jāatvadās jau no tā, kas jau ir atrasts." Māra is explicitly working on her attachment to things – she names it as a problem and frames it as ongoing work. Brīvbode as a tool for developing the capacity to let go. This is the freeshop as infrastructure for a personal practice of detachment. It is a positive framing of the same phenomenon that Rasa describes as generating excess – from Māra's perspective, having a route makes it easier to release.

PARAGRAPH #Z22MHT
  Brīvbode as material infrastructure enabling the practice of letting go. The freeshop does not just receive things; it creates conditions that make divestment possible for people who otherwise could not do it. This is the role of material arrangement in sustaining practice.

PARAGRAPH #JV33M5
  the practice of divestment requires competencies that include emotional regulation and the capacity to detach from objects. Māra is developing these competencies deliberately.

SECTION #Z7Y86N Plural meanings of acquisition that sustain participation in Brīvbode

PARAGRAPH #X6VKPZ
  Taking things in Brīvbode is sustained by a variety of meanings that do not need to be shared or mutually coherent across practitioners. The heterogeneity of meanings allows the practice to recruit across a wide and socially diverse public. The following section examines the main meaning clusters and what each reveals about how the practice recruits and retains its carriers – what do people experience as useful and rewarding when they opt to take things in Brīvbode.

PARAGRAPH #QCTGLZ
  For Marija, the primary meaning is access and dignity as Brīvbode enables a form of self-presentation beyond her regular means: "I dressed like an absolute princess. You can’t even find things like that in a shop." She takes pleasure in the secret source as other people in her networks cannot tell the difference between her clothing originating from Brīvbode or retail. This also has a competence dimension: knowing where to look, when to come, having access to a source others do not use.

PARAGRAPH #PAYAS2
  Anna frames her participation with a desire for aesthetic autonomy: “I've always really disliked it when I'm wearing something and someone else is wearing exactly the same." Instead of sustainability or thrift, this meaning is based on distinctiveness. Anna also has a sewing competency that works as an extension of the same desire – making her own clothing is the ultimate guarantee of uniqueness: the competency of sewing is sustained by the meaning. Additionally Brīvbode also enables Anna's daily performance of festivity: wearing a glitter dress as everyday wear is possible because Brīvbode provides a low-stakes supply resource.

PARAGRAPH #EJM4WU
  Elīna describes a similar dynamic at a lower threshold of commitment: “You can try out different styles for free. I took a bomber jacket I would never have bought myself." The jacket became one of her most-worn items. Brīvbode enabled a style experiment that she would not have risked financially. Similarly, a practitioner who was exploring cross-dressing also described: "What gives me joy is that I can create different characters from those clothes. For example, yesterday I went to my first cross-dresser date with this beautiful purple wig. I also got these court shoes... And that somehow challenged me to put them to use."

PARAGRAPH #8N5CQ8
  Madara’s participation is organised around her craftsperson's gaze – a competency that allows her to notice objects as made of particular components and materials. "When I see an item, I see it not just as a finished garment, but also, for example, as a material – fabric, beads, zippers." This competency distinguishes her participation from others and allows her to find value also in objects that other people might not find useful at all: "I found an old, cut mosquito net, which I use as a base for embroidery." Something that appeared to be waste turned out to be a useful resource to her. This is a heightened version of the right-owner logic – the object finds not just a user but a user who recognizes a value in it that is largely invisible to others. Also Madara’s rugmaking practice originated in having accumulated too many secondhand clothes – material surplus became the origin of a new practice.

PARAGRAPH #MXY2NM
  The craftsperson's gaze has a negative counterpart, however, when it is decoupled from valuing items as a shared resource: some visitors treat the shop as a source of free raw materials, cutting off buttons or zippers from garments, and leaving the damaged items behind – extracting the value themselves while diminishing it for everyone else.

PARAGRAPH #8R7Q44
  While alternative, these meanings simultaneously overlap with some of the meanings present in capitalist consumption –

PARAGRAPH #GN8UUK
  Alongside the meanings of novelty, originality and access is the meaning of class related stigma, and its presence significantly affects the practice’s recruitability. Some participants hinted at it subtly in conversation, but denied it when asked about it directly. Marija is the only one who explicitly named the shame associated with freecycling, and this cuts against any simple narrative of freecycling as normalized exchange practice for people of all walks of life. While actively and regularly using Brīvbode and also praising the things she has managed to acquire as high quality and aesthetically pleasing, nevertheless, she also compares taking from Brīvbode to going through someone else’s trash. Especially when a TV crew came to Brīvbode and a journalist approached her for a couple of words, she flatly refused “I will not let them see that I've fallen so low as to come to Brīvbode." Yet in the same conversation she also reclaims the class label: "I'm common, simply common (prasta – common, plain, I.L.). I will go and get what I need." The value is privately experienced, but restricted in representation.

PARAGRAPH #KBYYFJ
  For some potential practitioners this association with lower class status is a barrier to entry, while others manage it strategically. Several participants mentioned withholding information about the origin of items, especially when passing things acquired in Brīvbode to other people as gifts. As volunteer Anna noted, grandmothers say: “I don't tell my daughter where I got that jacket, because she wouldn't take it.”

PARAGRAPH #A99SUN
  A related strong negative meaning for second hand acquisition holds that these items carry the energy of previous – often deceased – owners. Several participants mentioned this trope but adjusted it to their practice. Viesturs, half-laughing, keeps the spiritual language but reframes it institutionally: "Others say that things have some kind of energy, or the aura of previous owners... We're able to transform that. In a way, Brīvbode is also like a kind of purgatory for things." With this adjusted meaning Brīvbode can function as a threshold space in the object biographies where the weight of previous owners can be released.

PARAGRAPH #86CMYM
  This stigma of second hand acquisition is, however, also generationally uneven and appears to be dissolving, similar to patterns reported elsewhere (Gurova, 2024). Changing meanings are shifting the practice’s recruitability. Madara notes how a broader normalization of secondhand acquisition in recent years has produced a shift within her own family, who previously held strong norms against it. Luīze, a highschooler preparing for graduation, uses the English word "thrift shops" to talk about her consumption practices, frames her participation in explicit environmental terms, and reports that her classmates are actively seeking secondhand options for graduation dresses. She attributes the negative meaning her parents hold towards second hand acquisition to “Soviet mentality”.

SECTION #6535KC Quiet or reflected sustainability?

PARAGRAPH #FNDALQ
  In our conversation, Viesturs also positions Brīvbode against charity but from a different angle than Rasa: "Our goal is not to do good for people, I think. Our goal is to do good for the planet… Charity is always related to the meaning of poverty. I think that we need to emphasize the fun factor, the joy factor – swapping, changing clothes. That it's cool, fun, that it's joyful." He is not only describing the meanings that sustain his own participation, but also making a claim about which meanings should be foregrounded to recruit and retain more practitioners. This orientation is present in Brīvbode and practically expressed through organising photo shoots and parties, encouraging playfulness with clothing.

PARAGRAPH #NDV326
  When I ask Viesturs if he sees working in Brīvbode as helping visitors or helping a cause, the question turns out to be beside the point: "To me it's so natural now, I don't evaluate it anymore. Others should evaluate it. It's simply a thing I do, without going into philosophical meanings." Sorting, switching clothing, chatting with visitors and attending to the shop so that it continues operating well – have become sufficiently routinised for him that they no longer require justification or meaning-work. The practice has stabilized to the point where the question of what it means has receded behind the doing.

PARAGRAPH #VQARCF
  Rasa answers similarly when I enquire about the environmental and sustainability aspects of Brīvbode: “Everything else is so intense… It has remained somehow, in a way, a little secondary." While the sustainability framing remains present – and is foregrounded e.g. when writing project funding applications or designing info materials – it does not need to be actively held by every practitioner in every performance. For both Viesturs and Rasa philosophical meaning-making has receded. This is what Smith and Jehlička (2013) describe as quiet sustainability: practices that produce sustainable outcomes without requiring their practitioners to hold or articulate sustainability as a motivation.

PARAGRAPH #XHSHXZ
  Sustainability as a meaning is present for practitioners, and e.g. Luīze is at the other end of the spectrum for whom it is expressed as primary rather than peripheral. She explicitly framed her participation in terms of ecological responsibility and the wider politics of avoiding fast fashion and microtrends.

PARAGRAPH #XNL7TE
  Līva discussed how the environmental meaning is present for her, but in tension with her actual acquisition practices. She identifies textile consumption as probably one of her most environmentally problematic behaviors, yet was open that knowing it does not resolve it. She estimates she buys an item of clothing every month and frames this as more than she used to in adolescence. The meanings she uses to evaluate her consumption patterns are in tension with the meanings that sustain the acquisition, and neither cancels the other one out. Researching household textile disposal, Sigaard (2026) concludes that even while sustainable consumption is ideally endorsed, disposal is very normalized because it is strongly embedded in identity work, relational considerations and in facilitating other practices.

PARAGRAPH #NVL4HP
  Also, as I argue, most participants come to Brīvbode for practical and social reasons instead of self-professed environmental conviction. This resonates with Smith and Jehlička’s (2013) concept of quiet sustainability, developed through their research on Czech urban gardeners: sustainable practices that can be widespread and effective but are not articulated in terms of sustainability by their practitioners. Smith and Jehlička contend that quiet sustainability is defined by practices “that result in beneficial environmental or social outcomes, that do not relate directly or indirectly to market transactions, and that are not represented by the practitioners as relating directly to environmental or sustainability goals. Cultures of sharing, repairing, gifting and bartering characterise quiet sustainability” (2013: 155). Latvia provides a productive context for this concept – several participants trace their orientations towards reuse and frugality to generational experience rather than sustainability aspiration. [..]

PARAGRAPH #3N5GKC
  Some participants do find meanings for their participation in explicit sustainability terms, though, and this difference should not be overlooked. The thesis holds both the quiet and the articulated dimensions without collapsing them into a single category, treating the variation between them as empirically interesting. In practice-theoretical terms, however, what practitioners say about why they do what they do is only one element of practice and “doings” hold the centre.

PARAGRAPH #UXQTEY
  (Lifestyles of Enough) “Finally, the meanings attached to sufficiency-oriented consumption practices go way beyond altruistic motives like environmental concern. As a study by Kropfeld et al. (2018) showed, environmentally concerned consumers (with more altruistic motives) have a higher environmental impact than voluntary simplifiers (with more self-related motives). Personal or egocentric motives, therefore, can lead to sufficiency-oriented behavior, as the example for sharing services from this review showed. This is in line with Sandberg’s (2021) findings on sufficiency practices related to miscellaneous consumption, as she connects a reduction of consumption of various products (incl. clothing) to anti-consumption lifestyles such as voluntary simplicity or frugality.

PARAGRAPH #T9XJDZ
  Quiet sustainability – sustainable practices without added sustainability meaning.

PARAGRAPH #B3S7DW
  what matters in sustainability? e.g. people gather egg cartons because it is easy, but issues that are more impactful and require more resources are more difficult to enact.

PARAGRAPH #EWC4HE
  Several participants in this study trace their orientations toward thrift and reuse to generational experience of the scarcity of the early post-Soviet period, or to upbringings in which resources were used carefully as a matter of practical necessity rather than environmental commitment.

PARAGRAPH #B4P2SJ
  The “activists” are part of the visitors, yet a large part do not frame their participation in Brīvbode primarily in environmental terms: they come because they have things to give away, because they sometimes find things they need. Their practices have sustainable dimensions that they do not necessarily name or claim.

PARAGRAPH #X9XV4X
  This framing does not require flattening the diversity of participant orientations. Some visitors do articulate explicit sustainability motivations – concerns about fast fashion, about waste, about the environmental costs of overconsumption. The thesis holds both the quiet and the articulated dimensions without forcing them into a single category, and treats the tension between them as empirically interesting rather than theoretically problematic. One question that remains open is whether explicit articulation makes sustainable practices more effective at retaining practitioners – more resistant to disruption when material or social conditions change. This is beyond the scope of the present study but worth noting as a direction for future research.

PARAGRAPH #CQFFRY
  Māra: "Mammai to lietu nebija daudz, un tās lietas tika visas, nu, ļoti labi uzturētas. Bet tad, kad jau parādījās tie humāno preču veikali, tad savukārt bija otrā drusku galējība."

SECTION #QS26PQ Conclusion

PARAGRAPH #54DUKD
  Freecycling in Brīvbode is sustained by a plurality of meanings that are compatible enough to coexist within the same space. Givers come to resolve the moral weight of unwanted things, the site’s permanence and visibility offer a trusted route for it. Takers come for dignity, experimentation, craft materials, social contact or simple convenience. The moral economy of exchange holds these heterogenous orientations together, as it is actively maintained against the pressure of resellers, heavy takers and people looking for charity, yet flexible enough to accommodate them when the alternative is overflow.

PARAGRAPH #7VVSEQ
  Sustainability can be an outcome without it being a requirement and a conscious orientation for practitioners. The practice recruits and retains carriers through meanings that also have little to do with environmental concern and yet the circulation it enables has sustainable dimensions that persist regardless of how participants frame their involvement.

PARAGRAPH #GJ3YQT
  This does not resolve the tension running through the chapter of Brīvbode functioning simultaneously as a moral circularity infrastructure embodying an alternative value regime of exchange and responsible material life – and as a low threshold overflow channel that absorbs the surplus generated by the consumption patterns it aspires to counter. This tension just reflects the observed dynamic of how sustainable practices are embedded in contemporary life.

### 11. Assistant

# How the MIKAEL draft differs from the [draft]

## Overall description

The MIKAEL draft (#4V8VH7) is a **later, more polished revision** of the same thesis as #FYG32U. The empirical material, the theoretical scaffolding, and the bulk of the analysis are nearly identical — many paragraphs are word-for-word duplicates. The difference is mostly editorial: MIKAEL has been **restructured for argumentative clarity, rewritten for tighter framing, and partly translated/integrated**, while [draft] still carries more visible scaffolding, fragments, and untranslated notes.

If you think of [draft] as the working manuscript with chapter outlines still showing, MIKAEL is the version where someone has gone through and turned outline-style passages into prose, retitled sections with arguments rather than topics, and trimmed redundancies.

## Specific differences

**1. Section titles encode arguments instead of topics**

MIKAEL gives chapters and subsections evocative, claim-bearing titles; [draft] uses functional descriptors:

| MIKAEL | [draft] |
|---|---|
| Ch 4 "Keeping Things Moving: Brīvbode as a Practice of Circulation" | "The circulation of things and things that sustain it" |
| Ch 5 "Holding It Together: Care and Consumption Work in Brīvbode" | "The Work of Circular Consumption" |
| 4.2 "Where It Begins: The Site as Active Flow" | 4.2 "Managing the flow on site" |
| 4.3 "Reading the Room: Norms and Competencies of Circulation" | 4.2.2 "Circulation norms and competencies" |
| 4.4 "Not a Charity: The Moral Economy of Exchange" | 4.2.3 "Meanings: the moral economy of exchange" |
| 4.5 "Letting Go: Attachment Without Price" | 4.3 "Non-monetary exchange and attachment: competencies of letting go" |
| 4.8 "Conclusion: Holding Together Incompatible Orientations" | 4.6 "Conclusion" |

**2. Chapter 4 is restructured from a nested to a flat outline**

[draft] has 4.2 with three sub-subsections (4.2.1 material site, 4.2.2 norms, 4.2.3 meanings). MIKAEL flattens these into co-equal sections 4.2–4.4. The flat structure reads more cleanly and lets the moral-economy argument stand on its own at chapter level.

**3. Introduction is leaner and ends with explicit research questions**

MIKAEL's intro has only three subsections (Latvian context #LAR465, note on terms #MUKRGA, structure #FVXBEK). [draft] separates out Policies (#QXGS6P) and Research questions (#PESH7N) into their own sections. MIKAEL folds the policy material into the opening paragraph (#J4M2WK) and lands the research questions cleanly at the end of the intro proper (#PYHGNL → #NSNSQ3, #3TTCZA). [draft] also has an extra fragmentary paragraph (#DG2R9J: "Aspirations to sustainable consumption persist…") that MIKAEL has cut.

**4. Chapter 4 opens with a stronger argumentative frame**

MIKAEL #PL9BXR–#L252MY is a four-paragraph chapter opening that previews the analytical move — moving between practice-as-entity and performance, and naming the central claim that Brīvbode "is held together less by a single definition than by the moral economy that allows incompatible orientations to coexist." [draft] has only two brief orientation paragraphs (#E3QN63, #QZ8Q4K) doing this work.

**5. The "Competencies of Circulation" passage is rewritten from notes into prose**

This is the most visible prose-level difference. [draft] §4.2.2 still has it as a stack of short, list-like paragraphs (#YNMVCK, #B66BK3, #VG295X, #9LRKLZ, #GWTLZ7, #JH9JK9, #UBWP9G, #Q2A66G) — clearly working notes. MIKAEL has consolidated those into three synthetic paragraphs (#76T3WR, #EXTCGS, #73DSQT) that integrate material literacy, acquisition competence, and divestment work into running argument, including the punchy line: *"each unconsidered acquisition becomes future divestment labour."*

**6. Latvian quotations are translated in MIKAEL**

In MIKAEL, Madara's, Aiga's, Māra's and Elīna R.'s Latvian interview quotes (#CUBS5Q, #9XUDV9, #QCXR6D, #Z2Y4K8, #LG8X4N) come with bracketed English translations. In [draft], the parallel paragraphs (#ZC2Z2F, #UYL6TZ, #VBVVXQ, #5JJ4KK, #U575JS) leave the Latvian untranslated. This is a clear sign of editorial pass MIKAEL has been through.

**7. Hobson et al. is integrated more carefully**

MIKAEL #BTDD45 quotes Hobson et al. (2021) directly — "move beyond the domestic sphere and space of the household" — and links it specifically to Brīvbode as a site where private divestment labour becomes visible. [draft] handles the same point in #FYJU8R and a near-duplicate #6G862E that doubles back on itself ("Brīvbode is such a space:" is repeated almost verbatim two paragraphs apart) — a residue of unfinished merging.

**8. Chapter 5 conclusion is properly placed**

MIKAEL has 5.5 Conclusion (#75D5UH) at chapter level. In [draft], the conclusion sits oddly nested as 5.4.1 (#GGGPNV) inside the gendered-work subsection — a structural slip MIKAEL has fixed.

**9. Methodology chapter title**

MIKAEL: "Research methodology: A Practice Freecycle" (which reads slightly garbled, possibly a typo). [draft]: "Research methodology: In The Field To Freecycle." This one might actually be a regression — worth checking which you prefer.

## Bottom line

MIKAEL is the version to keep working from. It has the better structure, the better titles, the better-integrated framing paragraphs, and translated quotes. [draft] is a useful archive of the working notes and any phrasings that got cut. The main remaining unfinished elements in MIKAEL — bracketed placeholders in the Latvian context section (#7LMSFU, #JNSARN, #N6UNLT), the orphaned fragments in the Letting Go section (#KM4KFK, #F6TNUS, #PYSU33), and the Quiet Sustainability section's note-form ending paragraphs (#JDEYZH, #Q9T2SN, #SY28Z3) — are the obvious targets if you want to push it closer to final.

### 12. User

can you describe how it differs in the ch5 prose besides the section structure also?

### 13. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `read`

```json
{
  "blocks": [
    "82G2QE",
    "F2943E"
  ],
  "expand": true
}
```

### 14. Tool result: read

THESIS #4V8VH7
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #82G2QE Holding It Together: Care and Consumption Work in Brīvbode

PARAGRAPH #DM28T4
  Rasa, the principal manager of Brīvbode, compared the swapshop’s operation to the flight of a bumblebee: while seemingly defying the laws of aerodynamics, it nevertheless continues to fly. This chapter examines the work that keeps Brīvbode running. Where the previous chapter examined freecycling as a practice – its venues, materials, meanings, and competencies, and the moral economy through which they cohere – this chapter turns to what that practice costs and to the people who pay it: in time, skill, and effort, and in the relational and ethical attention that the tasks of circulation demand. That labour is largely unpaid, unevenly distributed, and absorbed into existing practices of household management.

PARAGRAPH #EF5DET
  The chapter is organized by two complementary registers. Consumption work (Wheeler and Glucksmann 2015) names the tasks the practice demands – acquiring, sorting, maintaining, divesting, transporting – and tracks how they are distributed across technical, modal, and processual dimensions of the division of labour. Care work, in the feminist tradition and its recent applications to circular consumption (Mesiranta et al. 2025; Tölg and Fuentes 2025), names the relational and ethical orientation through which participants take this labour on, often without recognising it as work at all.

PARAGRAPH #S6HFAC
  Bankovska’s (2020) ethnography of the Latvian organic food movement bridges the two: drawing on Graeber (2018: 156), she observes that care is not always a joyful act but often involves unanticipated effort, obligation, hesitation, and disgust. The boundaries between consumption work, care work, and volunteer work are difficult to maintain in practice, and that is precisely what allows the labour that sustains Brīvbode to remain invisible to participants and to circular economy policy alike.

SECTION #N8D3HT Time to Give: Volunteers and the Sufficiency Lifestyle

PARAGRAPH #5SHEQN
  Brīvbode is sustained by volunteers for many of whom participation is only possible because their lives are organized around sufficiency – a practice cluster in its own right, characterised by flexible time, low monetary consumption, and small combined income streams. As Tan and Yeoh (2024) note, while material inputs in freecycling markets are readily available, the human labour required to organise and run them is consistently short in supply. As Viesturs puts it: “I understand that the lifestyle I live is complete luxury these days, at least for this part of the world. To have free time, to decide myself what to do with my time – that is the main resource. The most important thing that a person can donate to Brīvbode is their time.”

PARAGRAPH #BTZ4RL
  The sufficiency orientation is visible in how volunteers approach the management of resources in Brīvbode as well. When a new stove was needed, Rasa and her partner welded one themselves using upcycled components: gas canisters, springs from an old sofa, a drain fitting. Rasa framed it matter-of-factly: “What do you do if you don’t want to pay €1000 for a stove? You pick up the angle grinder yourself.” In the spirit of mutual exchange, in return for her partner’s invested time, she promised him a week of help with the tedious final sanding phase of his own DIY motorboat project.

PARAGRAPH #KSB7XK
  This is repair and upcycling competency, sufficiency orientation and collaborative volunteer labour combined in prioritising making do with what is available as both a practical skill and life orientation. Rasa described a similar approach to her own consumption practices: it is more advantageous for her to work less in formal employment and rather invest time in planning meals, researching purchases and visiting secondhand shops than to earn more and consume more easily to keep her preferred level of wellbeing.

PARAGRAPH #FT6K3G
  The volunteers’ time-rich, sufficiency-oriented lives make Brīvbode’s unpaid consumption work possible. They are also what makes possible a form of community-based care that non-profit organisations and local communities can offer to “balance marketised care,” with “clothes-swapping events” listed alongside repair cafés and community fridges as exactly this kind of arrangement (Mesiranta et al. 2025: 26). Sufficiency is the structural condition for both consumption work and care work: it is what makes the labour Brīvbode requires possible, and what allows that labour to be undertaken as care.

SECTION #SLFJ9K Priceless Valuation: Sorting, Curation, and Care

PARAGRAPH #U7QJHT
  Valuation work is the ongoing effort of assessing what is worth taking and bringing, and what should be left or discarded. Tölg (2025) describes valuation as comprising both evaluation — judging whether something is valuable — and valorising — the process of making it so — and shows that consumers rely on a range of valuation devices such as garment tags, retail staff knowledge, and resale platforms to perform this work. In retail, the price signal is the most legible such device, quietly slowing acquisition and supplying a shorthand for worth. When it is removed, that work does not disappear; it shifts onto participants and volunteers, drawing on moral and relational registers instead. As Beswick-Parsons et al. (2025) note, those committed to reuse develop the ability to perceive value where others do not, and this evaluative skill is a key competence of circulation work.

PARAGRAPH #KWPAYN
  The shift is most acute for volunteers, who absorb the valuation labour donors and visitors do not. Anna describes how she has developed her intuition for the gap between donor self-assessment and actual quality: “I really know it won’t be good even before I’ve opened the bag. I ask them: ‘Is everything really okay in there?’ ‘Yes, yes, only the best!’ And you open it, and there are moth-eaten pillows, piss-soaked blankets.” This competency has been developed over years of handling what arrives. The work of maintaining quality — assessing, sorting, deciding what goes out and what does not — is a form of consumption work that in commercial retail would fall to paid warehouse or quality-control staff; here it is absorbed by volunteers as a constant and largely invisible competency that visitors, who see only the finished presentation, mostly miss.

PARAGRAPH #7X9BV4
  Curation extends valuation work beyond sorting into knowing and managing people’s needs. Rasa describes it as having “a filter.” She sometimes holds specific items for specific regular visitors based on accumulated knowledge about their life circumstances: a particular colour of top for a visually impaired visitor, a wedding gift set aside for a regular who recently moved from homelessness into social housing. This is care work and consumption work simultaneously — the kind of matching labour that in retail is performed automatically through pricing, display, and inventory systems, but here depends on Rasa’s relational knowledge of specific people, which cannot be systematised or delegated, and which makes Brīvbode function as something more than a drop-off point.

PARAGRAPH #4HW9DD
  For visitors, the absence of price requires a new framework for what counts as legitimate taking. Madara recalled how disorienting the freeness was on her first visit: “At first it felt a bit like I was stealing.” She resolved this by reframing the transaction: “I see it as exchange. I somehow switch off the word ‘free’.” For her, freeness activates restraint rather than acquisition: “Someone maybe sees ‘free’ and thinks – everything is free, let’s take, take, take. For me it works the opposite way.” Her self-imposed restraint is itself valuation work — a moral framework constructed in the absence of the device that would otherwise supply one.

PARAGRAPH #4EZCAK
  Divestment, too, is shaped by valuation. When an item retains monetary value, participants take on the labour of online selling — photographing, writing descriptions, communicating with buyers, arranging meetings. As one participant noted: “you have to pull yourself together, photograph it and put it somewhere.” Brīvbode lowers this work considerably: it is a known, walkable destination that absorbs some of the divestment labour through volunteers and releases participants from finding a buyer or judging a recipient.

PARAGRAPH #A2APRY
  Across donating, curating, taking, and divesting, valuation in Brīvbode is at once consumption work — the labour of sorting, assessing, and redistributing — and care work, in the form of attention to what specific things will mean for specific people. Without the shorthand of price, both come into the open.

SECTION #EBTHSE Not the Bin: Modal Labour and the Informal Route

PARAGRAPH #SZG4E8
  If §5.2 traced the valuation work the absence of price creates, this section turns to the kind of arrangement in which that work takes place. Wheeler and Glucksmann’s modal dimension names how labour is distributed across different socioeconomic arrangements — paid and unpaid, formal and informal, market and non-market, household and institution — and how the same task takes on a different character depending on which arrangement it is embedded in. The same act of sorting used clothes is paid retail work in a thrift chain, contracted labour at a municipal textile collection point, unpaid domestic labour at home, and something else again at Brīvbode. The question this section asks is what kind of arrangement Brīvbode is, modally speaking, and what difference its form makes for the labour that runs it and the people it recruits.

PARAGRAPH #QQ9MKA
  Brīvbode is indirectly embedded in wider textile collection infrastructure, but the chain of work usually connects one household to another. Objects leaving one home pass through the swapshop and arrive in someone else’s home where a new set of consumption work tasks begin – storing, integrating, eventually deciding what to do when the object might no longer be wanted.

PARAGRAPH #EW2HC4
  Along this chain, unpaid volunteering, household management, neighbourly help, care work, and informal exchange come together in ways that blur distinctions between market and non-market activity and make the labour difficult to recognise as work at all, even though the system depends on it. This is precisely the kind of community-based care that, as Mesiranta et al. (2025) argue, marketised arrangements cannot perform: sequential reuse depends not on material availability alone but on what Hobson (2020) calls social circularities — the relational labour that keeps things moving between people.

PARAGRAPH #VA7PZF
  Some participants choose Brīvbode precisely because they do not want to perform labour for formal waste management institutions – they prefer the more relational, informal route. This is a modal choice: the same divestment work takes a different socioeconomic form depending on the route chosen, and Brīvbode's modal distinctiveness is part of what recruits and retains its participants.

PARAGRAPH #RCC9LM
  The modal choice is therefore also an ethical one. Brīvbode’s particular configuration of unpaid, informal, household-to-household labour is what allows consumption work to be performed as care, and care to be performed as a recognisable mode of circulation.

SECTION #L38KUE It’s On Me: Networks, Gender, and the Transmission of Care

PARAGRAPH #8JYYXC
  Wheeler and Glucksmann's processual dimension attends to how labour is distributed across the full span of a consumption process. In Brīvbode, this dimension is most visible in the extended divestment networks through which household surplus reaches the swapshop. The work that sustains Brīvbode is continuous with domestic consumption work  which is consistently organised through women's labour.

PARAGRAPH #PNGSGT
  Miller's (1998) research on shopping demonstrates that consumption is often organised around care for others rather than individual satisfaction, and that women frequently function as moral agents in household consumption as they are the ones acquiring, managing, and disposing of goods in relation to the needs of children, partners, and wider social networks. Wheeler and Glucksmann (2015) find the same gendered pattern in recycling: women typically take responsibility for sorting while men handle transport. The fieldwork conducted for this thesis reflects this consistently. Anna states it directly: "It's on me. I'm the one who supplies everyone with clothes and shoes." Silvija organises all divestment decisions in her household and says her husband "would just throw it in the bin." Men's role, where it appears, is typically transport and carrying the bags that women have sorted, selected, and prepared.

PARAGRAPH #3BY9GH
  The reach of Brīvbode extends considerably beyond those who physically visit it. Several of the most embedded participants perform substantial divestment work not only for themselves but for neighbours, colleagues, and family members, functioning as logistics nodes through which others' surplus flows to the freeshop. Marija's neighbours give her things to take to Brīvbode as she is a frequent visitor and the role has naturalised into her social identity in the building. Māra coordinates pickups from at least five neighbours, takes requests for specific items, and is the only one of her immediate network who actually visits – the rest route their divestment through her. Anna's work colleagues prepare parcels for her to deliver: "They use me. They prepare the bags I need to bring to Brīvbode. And then they say: 'Can you look for something for my teenage daughter?'" What looks like consumption work performed on behalf of others is, in Tölg and Fuentes’s (2025) terms, also care for neighbours and for the imagined future users of the things — the logistical labour and the relational orientation are inseparable.

PARAGRAPH #Y344XY
  Madara does divestment work for her aunt whose belief that worn objects carry the energy of previous owners prevents her from donating. In order to get to Brīvbode, the objects must pass through Madara first. "I know that most likely they would simply be thrown away or burned." The most laborious divestment case came from Aiga, who spent months coordinating the recirculation of her relatives' possessions after a relocation, making thirty trips to Brīvbode. A single call to a clearance firm would have resolved everything in one visit, Aiga says, but she chose the harder route because she could not allow things to be discarded: “Sometimes you really do want to just throw it out, but that inner feeling simply won’t let me.” This is consumption work in Bankovska’s (2020) sense of care not-work — labour that is unremunerated, hard to see as work from the outside, and yet performed because the alternative is unbearable. It is care as obligation that cannot be put down.

PARAGRAPH #VCEUP7
  Consumption work is both currently gendered and being transmitted along gendered lines. Kristīne takes her daughters to Brīvbode and uses the visits as occasions for explicit moral education: discussing why they are giving things away, what makes a good divestment decision, what is too worn to donate. She sometimes goes without them to avoid the tears when they want things back; other times the difficulty is the point. "It's also an opportunity to talk about things." The children are learning material quality, the ethics of giving, and the difference between good enough to donate and good enough only to discard — competencies that are simultaneously consumption-work skills and the dispositions of care that Bankovska (2020) shows being transmitted across generations in the everyday work of provisioning.

PARAGRAPH #SZVP2G
  What neither sufficiency nor valuation quite revealed, the processual dimension makes visible: the labour of Brīvbode is gendered not only structurally but ethically — women carry it because they have always carried care, and the consumption-work skills it requires are inseparable from the care dispositions through which they are taken on.

SECTION #75D5UH Conclusion

PARAGRAPH #5YXGE6
  This chapter has examined the labour that sustains freecycling in Brīvbode, finding it distributed across structural, ethical, and gendered dimensions that existing circular economy frameworks tend to overlook. Wheeler and Glucksmann’s consumption work concept names the structure: tasks that paid institutions would perform in formal retail or waste management contexts are here absorbed by unpaid volunteers and participants, distributed across modal and processual dimensions that stretch well beyond the freeshop itself. The feminist ethics of care and its recent applications to circular consumption (Mesiranta et al. 2025; Tölg and Fuentes 2025), together with Bankovska’s (2020) care not-work and Graeber’s (2018) account of work as what just needs to be done, name the orientation: much of this labour is not transferred from institutions onto reluctant consumers but self-imposed through ethical commitment and care – activities people perform because they cannot bring themselves not to. Miller (1998) names who bears it: consistently and disproportionately women, from household sorting and routing to managing others’ generosity to transmitting these competencies to the next generation.

PARAGRAPH #HM56MD
  Circular consumption requires substantial labour, and that labour is unevenly distributed. Sustainability of initiatives like Brīvbode depends on a structural condition – the sufficiency-oriented, time-rich, predominantly female volunteer and participant base that circular economy policy rarely names or supports (Hobson et al., 2021). Some of this labour is unreflexive and habituated – Aiga's inner feeling that prevents easy disposal, Marija's building logistics naturalised into her social role. Some is deliberate and effortful – Kristīne's category-by-category method, Madara working on her impulse-acquiring. Both are labour, but they are differently visible, and the unreflexive forms are the hardest to see and the hardest for policy to reach.

PARAGRAPH #RX9JDU
  What Brīvbode reveals — and what makes it analytically valuable for circular economy debates — is that the absence of price does not produce a frictionless flow of materials. It produces a different kind of work: gendered, ethically motivated, absorbed into household routines, and sustained by people who have organised their lives to be able to do it. Recognising this work as both consumption work and care work is the first step toward circular economy policy that can see it, support it, and not depend on its invisibility.

THESIS #FYG32U
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #F2943E The Work of Circular Consumption

PARAGRAPH #AFFP4F
  In one conversation Brīvbode manager Rasa compared the operation of the swapshop to the flight of a bumblebee as it is often said to defy conventional laws of aerodynamics, yet somehow manages to fly in practice. The comparison foregrounds the felt fragility of the initiative, even though it has operated consistently for years now. The swaphsop is sustained collectively, by volunteer labour and curation work, by the participation of visitors and their acquisition and divestment work and the informal networks through which things move between households and the swapshop. The operation of Brīvbode depends on substantial labour that is unpaid, unevenly distributed and absorbed into existing practices of household management.

PARAGRAPH #DKNKM6
  In this chapter I examine what this work consists of and how it is performed. The analytical framework for this is Wheeler and Glucksmann’s (2015) concept of consumption work – the activities, skills and labour that consumers engage in to acquire, use, manage and dispose of goods. Wheeler and Glucksmann’s framework distinguishes three dimensions: technical labour – the division of tasks and skills across different people; modal labour – the interdependencies of work across different socio-economic arrangements (paid and unpaid, formal and informal); and processual labour – the connections across the full span of production and consumption process (Wheeler & Gluckmann, 2015: 35-36). In circular economy contexts, becoming a circular consumer requires varied and unevenly distributed forms of consumption work whose nature and scope have been underplayed in circular economy debates, but which has significant implications for whether such initiatives can succeed (Hobson et al., 2021). As Mesiranta et al. (2025: 25) observe, even frontrunner consumers who have integrated circular practices into their lives perceive them as laborious and at times troublesome.

PARAGRAPH #VFVNL8
  Work and care are close and overlapping concepts in this account. As Bankovska (2020: 13) observes, drawing on Graeber (2018: 156), care is not always a joyful or pleasant act – it involves unanticipated effort, obligation, hesitation, and sometimes disgust. In this sense care resembles work: activities performed because they need to be done rather than because they are intrinsically rewarding. The chapter uses consumption work as its organising framework while recognising that the boundaries between consumption work, volunteer labour, and care work are difficult to maintain in practice, and that this difficulty is itself analytically significant.

SECTION #KWZ8DM Volunteer labour and sufficiency lifestyle

PARAGRAPH #FR59SD
  Brīvbode is sustained by volunteers for many of whom participation is only possible because their lives are organized around sufficiency – a practice cluster in its own right, characterised by flexible time, low monetary consumption, and small combined income streams. As Tan and Yeoh (2024) note, while material inputs in freecycling markets are readily available, the human labour required to organise and run them is consistently short in supply. As Viesturs puts it: “I understand that the lifestyle I live is complete luxury these days, at least for this part of the world. To have free time, to decide myself what to do with my time – that is the main resource. The most important thing that a person can donate to Brīvbode is their time.”

PARAGRAPH #QD63FV
  The sufficiency orientation is visible in how volunteers approach the management of resources in Brīvbode as well. When a new stove was needed, Rasa and her partner welded one themselves using upcycled components: gas canisters, springs from an old sofa, a drain fitting (in return for his invested time, she promised him a week of help sanding his DIY boat). Rasa framed it matter-of-factly: “But what do you do if you don’t want to pay €1000 for a stove? You pick up the angle grinder yourself.” This is repair and upcycling competency, sufficiency orientation and collaborative volunteer labour combined in prioritising making do with what is available as both a practical skill and life orientation. Rasa described similar approach to her own consumption practices: it is more advantageous for her to work less in formal employment and rather invest time in planning meals, researching purchases and visiting secondhand shops than to earn more and consume more easily to keep her preferred level of wellbeing.

SECTION #L5PE5X Valuation work without the context of price

PARAGRAPH #ZU8ZS9
  In retail, price is a formal evaluation that functions to slows acquisition and signals value. When price is removed a moral and more relational valuation comes to the fore. Valuation work is the ongoing effort of assessing what is worth taking and bringing, and what should be left or discarded. As Beswick-Parsons et al. (2025) note, those committed to reuse develop an ability to perceive value where others do not, and this evaluative skill is a key to circulation work.

PARAGRAPH #ZJG8XW
  The gap between donor self-assessment and actual quality is a recurring burden for volunteers. Anna describes she has developed her intuition: "I really know it won't be good even before I've opened the bag. I ask them: 'Is everything really okay in there?' 'Yes, yes, only the best!' And you open it, and there are moth-eaten pillows, piss-soaked blankets." This competency has been developed over years of handling what arrives. The work of maintaining quality – assessing, sorting, deciding what goes out and what does not – is constant and largely invisible to visitors who mostly only the finished presentation.

PARAGRAPH #737NYX
  Curation extends valuation work beyond sorting into knowing and managing people's needs. Rasa describes it as having "a filter". She sometimes holds specific items for specific regular visitors based on accumulated knowledge about their life circumstances: a particular colour of top for a visually impaired visitor, a wedding gift set aside for a regular who recently moved from homelessness into social housing. This is care work and consumption work simultaneously – relational knowledge that cannot be systematised or delegated, and that makes Brīvbode function as something more than a drop-off point.

PARAGRAPH #MSGHYR
  On the taking side, valuation work means learning what the absence of price actually requires. As a novice to freecycling practice, Madara was able to recall how disorienting the freeness was on her first visit: "At first it felt a bit like I was stealing." She resolved this by reframing the transaction: "I see it as exchange. I somehow switch off the word 'free'." For her, freeness activates restraint rather than acquisition: "Someone maybe sees 'free' and thinks – everything is free, let's take, take, take. For me it works the opposite way." The absence of price shifts valuation work onto participants, requiring them to develop frameworks of evaluation that the market would otherwise supply automatically.

PARAGRAPH #HM3BWV
  The labour of divestment also varies by route. Selling online is preferred when an item retains monetary value, and it requires photographing, writing descriptions, communicating with buyers, arranging delivery or meetings. As one participant noted, for items that might still have some value, "you have to pull yourself together, photograph it and put it somewhere." Brīvbode lowers this work considerably: it is a known, walkable destination where divestment requires neither finding a buyer nor judging a recipient. In Wheeler and Glucksmann's terms, Brīvbode redistributes consumption work – absorbing some of it through volunteer labour while releasing participants from other forms of it.

SECTION #A43655 Modal labour across socioeconomic modes

PARAGRAPH #HGVGLS
  Wheeler and Glucksmann’s modal dimension attends to how labour is distributed across different socioeconomic arrangements – market and non-market, paid and unpaid, formal and informal. In their original context of waste recycling, household consumption work feeds into municipal waste management system: people prepare, wash, sort and transport materials, performing labour that contributes to a formal insitutional process.

PARAGRAPH #5ZQLP4
  While Brīvbode is indirectly embedded in wider textile collection infrastructure, its operation as an informal volunteer initiative is modally different. The chain of work usually connects one household to another. Objects leaving one home pass through the swaphsop and arrive in someone elses home where a new set of consumption work tasks begin – storing, integrating, eventually deciding what to do when the object might no longer be wanted.

PARAGRAPH #4PNKDC
  Brīvbode brings together different forms of work – unpaid volunteering, household management, neighbourly help, care work, and informal exchange – in ways that blur distinctions between market and non-market activity and make the labour difficult to recognise as work at all, even though the system depends on it. As Mesiranta et al. (2025) describe, community-based circular consumption initiatives perform care work that more marketised arrangements cannot. Sequential reuse, as Hobson (2020) argues, depends not on material availability alone but on the social circularities – the relational labour – that keep things moving between people.

PARAGRAPH #SP2V6Q
  Some participants choose Brīvbode precisely because they do not want to perform labour for formal waste management institutions – they prefer the more relational, informal route. This is a modal choice: the same divestment work takes a different socioeconomic form depending on the route chosen, and Brīvbode's modal distinctiveness is part of what recruits and retains its participants.

SECTION #38335C Processual labour: exchange networks and gendered work

PARAGRAPH #73NW5B
  Wheeler and Glucksmann's processual dimension attends to how labour is distributed across the full span of a consumption process. In Brīvbode, this dimension is most visible in the extended divestment networks through which household surplus reaches the swapshop. The work that sustains Brīvbode is continuous with domestic consumption work  which is consistently organised through women's labour.

PARAGRAPH #8QVYKY
  Miller's (1998) research on shopping demonstrates that consumption is often organised around care for others rather than individual satisfaction, and that women frequently function as moral agents in household consumption as they are the ones acquiring, managing, and disposing of goods in relation to the needs of children, partners, and wider social networks. Wheeler and Glucksmann (2015) find the same gendered pattern in recycling: women typically take responsibility for sorting while men handle transport. The fieldwork conducted for this thesis reflects this consistently. Anna states it directly: "It's on me. I'm the one who supplies everyone with clothes and shoes." Silvija organises all divestment decisions in her household and says her husband "would just throw it in the bin." Men's role, where it appears, is typically transport and carrying the bags that women have sorted, selected, and prepared.

PARAGRAPH #JY7V8V
  The reach of Brīvbode extends considerably beyond those who physically visit it. Several of the most embedded participants perform substantial divestment work not only for themselves but for neighbours, colleagues, and family members, functioning as logistics nodes through which others' surplus flows to the freeshop. Marija's neighbours give her things to take to Brīvbode as she is a frequent visitor and the role has naturalised into her social identity in the building. Māra coordinates pickups from at least five neighbours, takes requests for specific items, and is the only one of her immediate network who actually visits – the rest route their divestment through her. Anna's work colleagues prepare parcels for her to deliver: "They use me. They prepare the bags I need to bring to Brīvbode. And then they say: 'Can you look for something for my teenage daughter?'"

PARAGRAPH #DGLFX7
  Madara does divestment work for her aunt whose belief that worn objects carry the energy of previous owners prevents her from donating. In order to get to Brīvbode, the objects must pass through Madara first. "I know that most likely they would simply be thrown away or burned." The most laborious divestment case came from Aiga, who spent months coordinating the recirculation of her relatives' possessions after a relocation, making thirty trips to Brīvbode. A single call to a clearance firm would have resolved everything in one visit, Aiga says, but she chose the harder route because she could not allow things to be discarded: "Sometimes you really do want to just throw it out, but that inner feeling simply won't let me." This is consumption work as self-imposed ethical burden of activities that need to be done out of obligation.

PARAGRAPH #LQTPNH
  Consumption work is both currently gendered and being transmitted along gendered lines. Kristīne takes her daughters to Brīvbode and uses the visits as occasions for explicit moral education: discussing why they are giving things away, what makes a good divestment decision, what is too worn to donate. She sometimes goes without them to avoid the tears when they want things back; other times the difficulty is the point. "It's also an opportunity to talk about things." The children are learning material quality, the ethics of giving, and the difference between good enough to donate and good enough only to discard.

SECTION #GGGPNV Conclusion

PARAGRAPH #8JXBYH
  This chapter has examined the labour that sustains freecycling in Brīvbode, finding it distributed across structural, ethical, and gendered dimensions that existing circular economy frameworks tend to overlook. Wheeler and Glucksmann's consumption work concept names the structure: tasks that paid institutions would perform in formal retail or waste management contexts are here absorbed by unpaid volunteers and participants, distributed across modal and processual dimensions that stretch well beyond the freeshop itself. Bankovska and Graeber name the motivation: much of this labour is not transferred from institutions onto reluctant consumers but self-imposed through ethical commitment and care – activities people perform because they cannot bring themselves not to. Miller names who bears it: consistently and disproportionately women, from household sorting and routing to managing others' generosity to transmitting these competencies to the next generation.

PARAGRAPH #T5LNZ9
  Circular consumption requires substantial labour, and that labour is unevenly distributed. Sustainability of initiatives like Brīvbode depends on a structural condition – the sufficiency-oriented, time-rich, predominantly female volunteer and participant base that circular economy policy rarely names or supports (Hobson et al., 2021). Some of this labour is unreflexive and habituated – Aiga's inner feeling that prevents easy disposal, Marija's building logistics naturalised into her social role. Some is deliberate and effortful – Kristīne's category-by-category method, Madara working on her impulse-acquiring. Both are labour, but they are differently visible, and the unreflexive forms are the hardest to see and the hardest for policy to reach.

PARAGRAPH #WQCQ9A
  CONCLUSION

PARAGRAPH #ENZMT5
  Naming the forms and distribution of consumption work is the chapter's contribution. Circular consumption requires substantial labor; that labor is unevenly distributed; and the sustainability of initiatives like Brīvbode depends on a structural condition – the sufficiency-oriented, time-rich, mostly female volunteer and participant base.

PARAGRAPH #JJA5J6
  Some of this work is unreflexive and habituated, some is deliberate and effortful (Madara working on her own impulse-acquiring, Kristīne's category-by-category method). Both are labor, but they are differently visible – and the unreflexive forms are the hardest to see and the hardest for policy to reach.

PARAGRAPH #ANCRJA
  Transactions of consumption work: “Rasa saka, ka darbs Brīvbodē dažreiz ļauj viņai nejusties vainīgai par to, ka viņa nesašķiro atkritumus.”

PARAGRAPH #YNFMZ5
  An example of acquisition functioning as a concerted social practice is found in Daniel Miller’s study of flea markets and antiques. For the participants, visiting these markets is a "highly regular commitment"–often a weekly ritual–focused on the constant circulation, exchange, and re-acquisition of objects. In this context, the routine of trading and collecting is more important than the individual objects themselves. This suggests that for some, the practice is not "using" the thing, but the rhythm of the search and the acquisition itself.

PARAGRAPH #H77SJA
  Līva L.: "Tā drēbju stanga... man liekas, viņa vēl kādam varētu noderēt. Un es neesmu to vēl tā kā izrisinājusi." A clothes rail that no longer has a place in her apartment but which she cannot yet bring herself to take anywhere – the sense that something is still good, someone could use it, but the act of routing it somewhere requires a decision and work to execute it (and appropriate divestment infrastructure).

PARAGRAPH #MC4GH7
  Visitors perhaps do not witness the complete material streams, but they see –

PARAGRAPH #QJNPTQ
  [No Singapūras pētījuma] Campbell-Johnston et al.’s (2020) argument that an item’s sequential (re)use is not a given. Rather, (re)use is underpinned by relational labour bound up in what Hobson (2020) calls social circularities.

PARAGRAPH #GDAK2E
  “As suggested by these researchers, joint efforts involving various types of actors, such as non-profit organisations and local communities, can help balance marketised care. Examples of this within circular consumption include repair cafés, clothes-swapping events, and community fridges for sharing leftover food in the neighbourhood. Community-based aspects of circular consumption have recently been highlighted (for a review, see Luukkonen et al., 2024), and the role of local communities in adopting and appropriating circular consumption and care should be further examined. Frontrunner consumers may have a significant role to play in establishing these communities and crafting policies that are built from the bottom-up and aligned with their everyday lives.” (Mesiranta et al. 2025: 26)

### 15. Assistant

# Prose-level differences in Chapter 5

Beyond the section structure, MIKAEL's Chapter 5 is **substantially rewritten** — more so than Chapter 4 was. Several passages are genuinely new prose rather than just re-titled or trimmed.

## 1. The chapter opening is reframed around two registers

[draft] opens (#AFFP4F–#VFVNL8) with the bumblebee anecdote, then a long methodological paragraph laying out Wheeler and Glucksmann's three dimensions (technical/modal/processual) verbatim, then a paragraph on care and Bankovska/Graeber. It reads like a literature setup.

MIKAEL opens (#DM28T4–#S6HFAC) much more economically and **introduces an organising claim that wasn't there before**: the chapter is now structured by "two complementary registers" — *consumption work* and *care work*. Care is no longer a side note but a parallel analytic. This is a real conceptual upgrade, not just polish. The Mesiranta et al. (2025) and Tölg & Fuentes (2025) citations are pulled into the framing where in [draft] they appeared only later (and Tölg & Fuentes wasn't there at all).

## 2. New theoretical scaffolding from Tölg (2025)

MIKAEL #U7QJHT opens the valuation section by introducing **Tölg's (2025) distinction between evaluation and valorising, and the concept of "valuation devices"**. None of this is in [draft]. It is genuinely new material that strengthens the analytical move from "price as signal" to "price as valuation device whose absence shifts work elsewhere."

## 3. Recurring "in retail X / here Y" comparative move

MIKAEL repeatedly sharpens what Brīvbode does *differently from formal retail*, naming the contrast explicitly:
- "in commercial retail would fall to paid warehouse or quality-control staff" (#KWPAYN)
- "the kind of matching labour that in retail is performed automatically through pricing, display, and inventory systems" (#7X9BV4)

[draft] makes the same observations but without the explicit retail-counterfactual ("constant and largely invisible to visitors who mostly only the finished presentation" — #ZJG8XW, where the sentence is even ungrammatical).

## 4. The modal section gains an explicit thesis

MIKAEL #SZG4E8 opens the modal section with a sharp framing: "The same act of sorting used clothes is paid retail work in a thrift chain, contracted labour at a municipal textile collection point, unpaid domestic labour at home, and something else again at Brīvbode." That four-way comparison is **new** and immediately makes the modal concept concrete. [draft] #HGVGLS opens flatter, mostly restating Wheeler & Glucksmann.

MIKAEL #RCC9LM also adds a closing claim that wasn't there: "The modal choice is therefore also an ethical one. Brīvbode's particular configuration of unpaid, informal, household-to-household labour is what allows consumption work to be performed as care, and care to be performed as a recognisable mode of circulation."

## 5. The processual section gets an explicit care-not-work reading

In MIKAEL #3BY9GH and #Y344XY, Aiga's thirty-trip case, Anna's colleagues, and Madara's aunt are explicitly read through **Tölg & Fuentes (2025) and Bankovska's "care not-work"** — "labour that is unremunerated, hard to see as work from the outside, and yet performed because the alternative is unbearable. It is care as obligation that cannot be put down." That theoretical reading is new prose; [draft] has the same vignettes (#JY7V8V, #DGLFX7) but only labels them descriptively as "consumption work as self-imposed ethical burden."

## 6. New section-closing micro-conclusions

Every MIKAEL subsection now ends with a one-paragraph synthesis that distils the argument:
- Sufficiency section closes (#FT6K3G): "Sufficiency is the structural condition for both consumption work and care work…"
- Valuation closes (#A2APRY): "Across donating, curating, taking, and divesting, valuation in Brīvbode is at once consumption work…and care work."
- Modal closes (#RCC9LM, quoted above)
- Processual closes (#SZVP2G): "What neither sufficiency nor valuation quite revealed, the processual dimension makes visible: the labour of Brīvbode is gendered not only structurally but ethically…"

These transitional/synthesising paragraphs **don't exist in [draft]**. They build a cumulative argument across the chapter rather than four parallel mini-essays.

## 7. The conclusion is rewritten and consolidated

MIKAEL's conclusion (#5YXGE6, #HM56MD, #RX9JDU) is three tight paragraphs ending with a clear policy claim: "Recognising this work as both consumption work and care work is the first step toward circular economy policy that can see it, support it, and not depend on its invisibility." That last sentence is **new** — and is arguably the chapter's bottom line.

[draft] has the same opening conclusion paragraphs (#8JXBYH, #T5LNZ9) but then dribbles into a duplicated CONCLUSION header followed by leftover note fragments (#WQCQ9A through #GDAK2E) — including a stray paragraph about Daniel Miller and flea markets, an untranslated Latvian quote about Līva, a placeholder fragment about visitors witnessing material streams, and two long uncited literature blocks. MIKAEL has cleaned all of that out.

## 8. Citation upgrades throughout

MIKAEL adds and integrates **Tölg (2025), Tölg & Fuentes (2025), and Mesiranta et al. (2025)** as load-bearing citations rather than footnote-style references. The Mesiranta quote about clothes-swapping events as "balance to marketised care" — which sat as a leftover block at the bottom of [draft]'s chapter (#GDAK2E) — has been promoted into the sufficiency section's argument (#FT6K3G).

## Bottom line

Chapter 5 in MIKAEL isn't just reorganised — it has a **new analytic spine** (consumption work + care work as two registers), **new theoretical scaffolding** (Tölg's valuation devices, Tölg & Fuentes's care framework, Bankovska's care not-work read through Graeber), **explicit retail/institutional counterfactuals**, **section-by-section synthesis paragraphs**, and a **rewritten policy-oriented conclusion**. It's the most substantively revised chapter of the two drafts you have.

### 16. User

describe this a bit more fluently and interestingly but concisely for ieva who is tired and wants to get the thesis done, i tried to help by making ch5 more cohesive and integrating the care work paradigm as she suggested, do the comparison without focusing on what's chaotic in the ch5 draft more just like going through the sections and the additions and so on especially with an eye towards confirming that the thesis research and argumentation itself is interesting and coherent when you just polish it up and tie it together a bit (which is hard to see the forest for the trees when one has been immersed in writing all the stuff and thinking and researching etc....)

### 17. Assistant

# What changed in Chapter 5 — and why it works

Ieva, the bones of this chapter were already solid. What the MIKAEL revision does is mostly let the argument **come forward** from underneath the scaffolding. Here's a walk-through, with the news that the underlying research is genuinely coherent and interesting once it's tied together.

**The opening (#DM28T4–#S6HFAC).** Instead of unpacking Wheeler & Glucksmann's three dimensions up front like a textbook, the chapter now names its two organising registers: *consumption work* (what the practice demands) and *care work* (the orientation through which people take it on). That single move turns Chapter 5 into an argument rather than an application of a framework. Bankovska and Graeber sit between them as the bridge — care that involves "obligation, hesitation, and disgust." This is exactly the integration you said you wanted.

**§5.1 Time to Give (#5SHEQN–#FT6K3G).** Same Viesturs quote, same welded stove, same sufficiency point — but now it lands with a claim: sufficiency is the *structural condition* that makes both the consumption work and the care work possible. Mesiranta et al.'s "balance to marketised care" gets folded in here where it belongs, instead of sitting as an orphaned block at the bottom of the chapter.

**§5.2 Priceless Valuation (#U7QJHT–#A2APRY).** This is where the new theoretical material does the most work. Tölg's (2025) distinction between *evaluation* and *valorising*, and the idea of "valuation devices" — price being one — gives you a clean way to say: when the price device is removed, the labour doesn't disappear, it migrates onto volunteers and visitors and changes register. Anna's moth-eaten pillows, Rasa's "filter," Madara's "I switch off the word free" — they all now read as instances of the same analytic point. The retail counterfactual ("in commercial retail this would fall to paid quality-control staff") makes visible exactly how much labour Brīvbode is absorbing.

**§5.3 Not the Bin (#SZG4E8–#RCC9LM).** The modal section now opens with the same sorting task imagined across four arrangements — thrift chain, municipal collection, household, Brīvbode — which makes Wheeler & Glucksmann's modal concept concrete in one sentence. The closing line is new and load-bearing: Brīvbode's particular modal configuration is what *allows consumption work to be performed as care, and care to be performed as a mode of circulation*. That's a real claim.

**§5.4 It's On Me (#8JYYXC–#SZVP2G).** Same vignettes you had — Anna, Marija, Māra, Aiga, Madara, Kristīne — but now read explicitly through Tölg & Fuentes's care framework and Bankovska's "care not-work." Aiga's thirty trips become the chapter's most powerful illustration: "labour that is unremunerated, hard to see as work from the outside, and yet performed because the alternative is unbearable. Care as obligation that cannot be put down." The closing synthesis (#SZVP2G) is the chapter's quiet bombshell: the labour is gendered *not only structurally but ethically* — women carry it because they have always carried care, and the skills are inseparable from the dispositions.

**Conclusion (#5YXGE6–#RX9JDU).** Three tight paragraphs that name what each conceptual move was for: Wheeler & Glucksmann names the structure, Bankovska/Graeber/Tölg & Fuentes name the orientation, Miller names who bears it. Then the policy line you've been building toward all chapter: *recognising this work as both consumption work and care work is the first step toward circular economy policy that can see it, support it, and not depend on its invisibility*. That is a publishable closing claim.

---

**The forest, since you've been in the trees:** Your argument is that the absence of price doesn't produce frictionless circulation — it produces a *different kind of work*, gendered, ethically motivated, absorbed into household routines, sustained by people who have organised their lives to be able to do it. Chapter 4 establishes that Brīvbode is held together by a moral economy that lets incompatible orientations coexist. Chapter 5 establishes that the labour holding it together is invisible to circular economy policy precisely because it is performed as care. Together these are the two halves of one coherent contribution: empirically rich, theoretically integrated (practice theory + consumption work + care), and saying something circular-economy scholarship genuinely needs to hear.

You're closer than you think. Keep going.

### 18. User

thanks! the next endeavor is to work over ch4 and pay attention to shove's book from what is it 2015?

### 19. Assistant

Quick clarification before I dive in — there are two candidates and I want to make sure I pull the right one:

- **#VJ8G58 "Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life"** (Shove, Rinkinen, Jalas, 2015) — a paper, very relevant to Ch 4: it's about how objects move through people's lives and how relations between people and things are bundled, accumulated, released. Could feed directly into your divestment, attachment, and "letting go" sections.
- **#5AXAEJ *The Dynamics of Social Practice*** (Shove, Pantzar, Watson, **2012**) — the practice theory book you already cite throughout, materials/meanings/competencies. You may be misremembering the year.

Which did you mean? My guess is the 2015 paper, since you specified "2015" and the book is what you've already been working with — but say the word and I'll start skimming and mapping it onto Ch 4.

### 20. User

oh yeah 2012 the social practice theory book...

### 21. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `get_document`

```json
{
  "id": "5AXAEJ"
}
```

#### Tool call: `search_text`

```json
{
  "document_id": "4V8VH7",
  "limit": 20,
  "query": "Shove Pantzar Watson"
}
```

### 22. Tool result: get_document

DOCUMENT #5AXAEJ
Title: The Dynamics of Social Practice

Outline:
  - 1 #5W2PJB THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PRACTICE
  - 2 #SM2ASL THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PRACTICE
  - 3 #MLWG3R THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PRACTICE
  - 4 #ERYLEX CONTENTS
  - 5 #RJD3SC LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLE
    - 5.1 #AQ5ZUD Figures
    - 5.2 #K42KWM Table
  - 6 #3JT2SD ABOUT THE AUTHORS
  - 7 #47JF6S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  - 8 #WWSYJP 1
  - 9 #MV5P3X THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PRACTICE
    - 9.1 #XKXCG8 INTRODUCING THEORIES OF PRACTICE
    - 9.2 #CGRC4S MATERIALS AND RESOURCES
    - 9.3 #BBQ2U3 SEQUENCE AND STRUCTURE
  - 10 #4F5G4N 2
  - 11 #W6VMCW MAKING AND BREAKING LINKS
    - 11.1 #Z73JHW MATERIAL, COMPETENCE AND MEANING
    - 11.2 #XZV45L CAR-DRIVING – ELEMENTS AND LINKAGES
      - 11.2.1 #DBJWEC MAKING LINKS
      - 11.2.2 #VEDDZZ BREAKING LINKS
    - 11.3 #EBZCFW ELEMENTS BETWEEN PRACTICES
    - 11.4 #QM4X2J STANDARDIZATION AND DIVERSITY
    - 11.5 #J9P8DZ INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE CAREERS
  - 12 #NX87WU 3
  - 13 #XG9NDT THE LIFE OF ELEMENTS
    - 13.1 #6H9VRT MODES OF CIRCULATION
      - 13.1.1 #3KWGMM Transportation and access: material
      - 13.1.2 #THMJ59 Abstraction, reversal and migration: competence
      - 13.1.3 #SY5EDK Association and classification: meaning
      - 13.1.4 #YLZQUZ Packing and unpacking
    - 13.2 #WPPBPJ EMERGENCE, DISAPPEARANCE AND PERSISTENCE
  - 14 #A7D5SC 4
  - 15 #NXZT4D RECRUITMENT, DEFECTION AND REPRODUCTION
    - 15.1 #F8JCHW FIRST ENCOUNTERS: NETWORKS AND COMMUNITIES
    - 15.2 #7QBCW8 CAPTURE AND COMMITMENT: CAREERS AND CARRIERS
    - 15.3 #8JX39Z COLLAPSE AND TRANSFORMATION: THE DYNAMICS OF DEFECTION
    - 15.4 #PLFBHW DAILY PATHS, LIFE PATHS AND DOMINANT PROJECTS
  - 16 #9XVXK2 5
    - 16.1 #CXK5CC CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PRACTICES
    - 16.2 #ELA87Q BUNDLES AND COMPLEXES
    - 16.3 #TVA3KY COLLABORATION AND COMPETITION
    - 16.4 #67PN8N SELECTION AND INTEGRATION
    - 16.5 #XC89XB COORDINATING DAILY LIFE
  - 17 #7HCNWJ 6
  - 18 #KTKRHR CIRCUITS OF REPRODUCTION
    - 18.1 #5LUMHC MONITORING PRACTICES-AS-PERFORMANCES
      - 18.1.1 #E8H23B MONITORING PRACTICES-AS-ENTITIES
      - 18.1.2 #TCT35W CROSS-REFERENCING PRACTICES-AS-PERFORMANCES
      - 18.1.3 #CRNFAD CROSS-REFERENCING PRACTICES-AS-ENTITIES
      - 18.1.4 #Z5LZBV Aggregation
      - 18.1.5 #JEXR3M Elements of coordination
    - 18.2 #ZUAQBH INTERSECTING CIRCUITS
  - 19 #4JFLZ9 7
  - 20 #GUVB7V REPRESENTING THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL PRACTICE
    - 20.1 #Q8XDZB REPRESENTING ELEMENTS AND PRACTICES
      - 20.1.1 #2A3N85 CHARACTERIZING CIRCULATION
      - 20.1.2 #BFDM4Q COMPETITION, TRANSFORMATION AND CONVERGENCE
    - 20.2 #QPH46U REPRODUCING ELEMENTS, PRACTICES AND RELATIONS BETWEEN THEM
      - 20.2.1 #RA7LJ2 TIME AND PRACTICE
      - 20.2.2 #UJXB44 SPACE AND PRACTICE
      - 20.2.3 #SKGSBB DOMINANT PROJECTS AND POWER
  - 21 #6P2ZMD 8
  - 22 #QRSCLP PROMOTING TRANSITIONS IN PRACTICE
    - 22.1 #VC26KP CLIMATE CHANGE AND BEHAVIOUR CHANGE
      - 22.1.1 #8GFJNF Basis of action
      - 22.1.2 #AJ757K Processes of change
      - 22.1.3 #AMQ7FN Positioning policy
      - 22.1.4 #RCW67Z Transferable lessons
    - 22.2 #WNL5BX PRACTICE THEORY AND CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY
      - 22.2.1 #8WHQQJ Configuring elements of practice
      - 22.2.2 #4F8F39 Configuring relations between practices
      - 22.2.3 #YVMFU5 Configuring careers: carriers and practices
      - 22.2.4 #NBLH65 Configuring connections
    - 22.3 #LYZ8XN PRACTICE-ORIENTED POLICY MAKING
  - 23 #L9W9UH REFERENCES
  - 24 #3VZ9WM INDEX

### 23. Tool result: search_text

Exact matches

1. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Matching paragraph #RU2ER4:
      Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

2. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #Q2WXHP Theories of Practice
  Matching paragraph #KSLB7G:
      A particularly influential contribution, especially in anthropological approaches to practice, is the work of Elisabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar and Matt Watson (2012) in which the authors offer a deliberately compact three-component framework for analysing practices: practice as entity. Shove and colleagues define a practice element frame consisting of meanings, materials, and competencies. “Meanings” refer to the ideas, aspirations, shared understandings and related values that give practice its purpose and make it intelligible for practitioners and guide how practices are performed. “Materials” refer to objects involved and used in practice, necessary technologies and infrastructure through which practices are enacted. It also refers to bodies and physicality. “Competencies” are the skills (across cognitive and physical realms) and practical knowledge necessary for participation in a practice, including understanding how to use objects, follow rules, and navigate social norms.

3. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #ZF9EYF Introduction
  Matching paragraph #SNLDAM:
      The thesis draws on two main analytical frameworks. The first is practice theory, following Shove, Pantzar and Watson (2012) and other authors studying sustainable consumption practices. Freecycling is analysed as a practice-entity constituted by materials, meanings, and competencies. The second theoretical framework is Wheeler and Glucksmann's (2015) concept of consumption work that brings attention to the range of tasks required of consumers before or after the moment of exchange, on which consumption itself depends, especially within contexts of circular economy initiatives. It is extended here to include the volunteer labour of the freeshop and the divestment networks through which household surplus reaches it. Together these frameworks allow the thesis to attend to both what freecycling is as a recognisable social form, and what it costs in labour, skill, and care to sustain it.

4. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #ULSUAX Conclusion
  Matching paragraph #3JUPW7:
      Shove conceptualizes material entities as one of the core elements of practice, alongside meanings and competencies (Shove et al., 2012; Shove et al., 2007). Acknowledging the different roles that material entities can play, three categories of materiality are proposed: resources (consumables used up in practices), devices (objects directly mobilized during practices), and infrastructure (supporting systems not directly engaged) (Shove, 2016).

5. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #WULWDF Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
  Matching paragraph #N4RD83:
      Practice theory, as developed by Elisabeth Shove, has been applied a lot to analyze stable, dominant, and largely unreflected practices that are taken for granted in everyday domestic routines (Shove 2003), particularly the inconspicuous consumption of energy and resources in affluent Western societies that drives resource use beyond planetary boundaries. Shove has even argued that “investigations into the beliefs and actions of self-confessed environmentalists represent something of a distraction. What counts is the big, and in some cases, global swing of ordinary, routinized and taken-for-granted practice…” (Shove, 2003: 9).

6. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Matching paragraph #KJPCEP:
      Watson, D., Hvass, K.K., Moora, H., Martin, K., Nausėdė, V., Gurauskiene, I. and Akule, D. (2020) Post-consumer textile circularity in the Baltic countries: current status and recommendations for the future. TemaNord 2020:526. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/temanord2020-526

7. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Matching paragraph #3CALAB:
      Shove, E. (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.

8. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Matching paragraph #SA7WPJ:
      Shove, E. and Walker, G. (2010) ‘Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life’, Research Policy, 39(4), pp. 471–476.

9. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #ZF9EYF Introduction
      #LAR465 Latvian context and research
  Matching paragraph #TT4B8P:
      Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States, particularly in Latvia, where it accounts for a substantial share of total consumption. In 2018 around 40% of textile consumption in Latvia was second-hand (Watson et. al., 2020). The collection system in Latvia has undergone rapid expansion and formalization through new legislation. Latvia introduced mandatory separate textile collection in 2023, reflecting the broader EU regulatory direction established by the Circular Economy Action Plan and the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles.

10. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #M9WQLY CONCLUSION
  Matching paragraph #9DTFUU:
      Further research might –– move into constitution of need… (Shove and Rinkinen) In line with Warde (2005). Circular consumption is one thing, but does it matter how you get things if it’s still an overflow?

11. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #ZF9EYF Introduction
      #LAR465 Latvian context and research
  Matching paragraph #SRVVZ4:
      A shift began with the emergence of more structured divestment infrastructures, such as the opening of the first Otrā Elpa charity shop in Riga in 2009. These initiatives introduced new channels for divestment, and gradually moved second-hand consumption from a one-directional flow of aid toward a more participatory system of reuse. Data indicates that second-hand acquisition remains a significant part of the textile market in the Baltic States: a 2023 representative survey found that 55% of Latvian participants currently buy second-hand clothing (Akule et al., 2023), and in 2018 second-hand accounted for around 40% of textile consumption in Latvia (Watson et al., 2020).

12. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #Q2WXHP Theories of Practice
  Matching paragraph #JCD8P5:
      Practices as entities can be distinguished from practices as performances: the specific, recurrent enactments through which practices are reproduced or transformed. Transformation and change comes through recombination of the elements of practice (Shove et al. 2012) – a complex process that is constantly evolving and difficult to predict.

13. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9XAKTW Keeping Things Moving: Brīvbode as a Practice of Circulation
      #2JEZWG Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home
  Matching paragraph #CLU5VP:
      Noting how meanings migrate across practices, Shove et al. (2012) mention how thrift, for example, is no longer expressed through darning socks at home – now a rather rare practice – but has moved, as Gregson (2007) shows, into methods and styles of disposal and divestment. Divesting responsibly has become one of the ways people sustain and recreate identity in relation to their things.

14. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #WULWDF Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
  Matching paragraph #QTER48:
      Freecycling at Brīvbode sits at an interesting angle in this argument – it has both conventional and unconventional elements. It is not a widely shared, fully stabilised routine practice in Shove’s sense. Yet the practices it draws on – household divestment, secondhand acquisition, sequential use of goods – are not unusual in Riga or Latvia; what is less common is their organisation within a permanent, non-monetary exchange site. It is also a practice that is becoming more prevalent, as similar spaces and infrastructures appear more in Latvia.

15. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #HQ4PZX Consumption practices
  Matching paragraph #437SCH:
      There is also a particular affinity between consumption and sustainability studies. Welch and Warde (2015) identify three reasons for it. Firstly, much of the environmental impact of consumption stems from routine practices – such as showering or doing laundry – that involve significant, yet often unnoticed, use of energy and resources (Shove, 2003). For such inconspicuous, resource intensive practices analysis of consumption as symbolic display and presentation of self that was more prevalent in consumption studies before is less relevant than attention to the material and social arrangements that sustain them. Secondly, because goods and services are primarily used for the accomplishment of social practices rather than for consumption per se. Thirdly, practice theory can provide a way out of discussions of the “value–action” gap – the persistent discrepancy between reportedly pro-environmental values which by contrast are not reflected in a person’s behaviour – by redirecting focus on the ways resource intensive practices capture and retain their practitioners.

16. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #Q2WXHP Theories of Practice
  Matching paragraph #QPWYY6:
      Delineating a practice and setting it apart from adjacent practices can be one of the challenges in practice theory, as there are no fixed procedural rules for determining exactly where one practice ends and another begins. Nicolini (2017: 26-27) notes that, while for analytical purposes, practices can be conceived and examined individually, empirically they are always encountered in arrays and multiplicities. Practices “hang together” in bundles and complexes (Shove et al. 2012), distinguished by the density and “stickiness” of their patterns. Practice bundles refer to the more loose-knit relations between practices, often gathered around the same site or time – practices that are related and shape each other but not strongly. Complexes refer to more integrated combinations that can also constitute new practice entities if the relations become significantly denser. In this thesis, I analyse freecycling in Brīvbode as a practice entity and as performed, while recognising the emerging state of freecycling as a practice in Latvia.

Approximate matches

1. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.544
  Related paragraph #RU2ER4:
      Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

2. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.442
  Related paragraph #SA7WPJ:
      Shove, E. and Walker, G. (2010) ‘Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life’, Research Policy, 39(4), pp. 471–476.

3. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.364
  Related paragraph #3CALAB:
      Shove, E. (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.

4. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #WULWDF Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
  Score: 0.363
  Related paragraph #N4RD83:
      Practice theory, as developed by Elisabeth Shove, has been applied a lot to analyze stable, dominant, and largely unreflected practices that are taken for granted in everyday domestic routines (Shove 2003), particularly the inconspicuous consumption of energy and resources in affluent Western societies that drives resource use beyond planetary boundaries. Shove has even argued that “investigations into the beliefs and actions of self-confessed environmentalists represent something of a distraction. What counts is the big, and in some cases, global swing of ordinary, routinized and taken-for-granted practice…” (Shove, 2003: 9).

5. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #ULSUAX Conclusion
  Score: 0.35
  Related paragraph #3JUPW7:
      Shove conceptualizes material entities as one of the core elements of practice, alongside meanings and competencies (Shove et al., 2012; Shove et al., 2007). Acknowledging the different roles that material entities can play, three categories of materiality are proposed: resources (consumables used up in practices), devices (objects directly mobilized during practices), and infrastructure (supporting systems not directly engaged) (Shove, 2016).

6. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #Q2WXHP Theories of Practice
  Score: 0.344
  Related paragraph #KSLB7G:
      A particularly influential contribution, especially in anthropological approaches to practice, is the work of Elisabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar and Matt Watson (2012) in which the authors offer a deliberately compact three-component framework for analysing practices: practice as entity. Shove and colleagues define a practice element frame consisting of meanings, materials, and competencies. “Meanings” refer to the ideas, aspirations, shared understandings and related values that give practice its purpose and make it intelligible for practitioners and guide how practices are performed. “Materials” refer to objects involved and used in practice, necessary technologies and infrastructure through which practices are enacted. It also refers to bodies and physicality. “Competencies” are the skills (across cognitive and physical realms) and practical knowledge necessary for participation in a practice, including understanding how to use objects, follow rules, and navigate social norms.

7. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.334
  Related paragraph #BR7XTP:
      Evans, D., McMeekin, A. and Warde, A. (2012) ‘Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practice’. In: Warde, A. and Southerton, D. (eds.) The habits of consumption. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, pp. 113–129.

8. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.329
  Related paragraph #UVK7TJ:
      Warde, A. and Southerton, D. (eds.) (2012) The habits of consumption. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies.

9. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #L759F3 Circulation, Practice, and Consumption Work: A Theoretical Framework
      #WULWDF Theories of Practice to Study Alternative Practices?
  Score: 0.321
  Related paragraph #3RASYG:
      Yet as Welch and Warde (2015) note, this strategic move away from environmentalists’ motivations has come at a cost, leading to a neglect of the cultural dimensions of sustainable consumption (Spaargaren 2013). Other authors have argued for a greater attention to non-hegemonic practices that serve as alternatives to mass consumption (e.g. Speck and Hasselkuss 2015). Practice theories are useful here too, as a tool for understanding how more sustainable alternatives might become normalised or integrated into existing consumption routines.

10. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.312
  Related paragraph #4RABAB:
      Camacho-Otero, J., Pettersen, I.N. and Boks, C. (2020) ‘Consumer engagement in the circular economy: exploring clothes swapping in emerging economies from a social practice perspective’, Sustainable Development, 28(1), pp. 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2002

11. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.308
  Related paragraph #9M9D7K:
      Horton, K. (2020) 'Just use what you have: Ethical fashion discourse and the feminisation of responsibility', in Parkins, I. and Dever, M. (eds.) Fashion: New feminist essays. Routledge, pp. 109–123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010418

12. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.306
  Related paragraph #AVZ5K4:
      Welch, D. and Warde, A. (2015) ‘Theories of practice and sustainable consumption’. In: Reisch, L. and Thøgersen, J. (eds.) Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 84–100.

13. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9XAKTW Keeping Things Moving: Brīvbode as a Practice of Circulation
      #2JEZWG Incoming Flow: Divestment From Home
  Score: 0.301
  Related paragraph #CLU5VP:
      Noting how meanings migrate across practices, Shove et al. (2012) mention how thrift, for example, is no longer expressed through darning socks at home – now a rather rare practice – but has moved, as Gregson (2007) shows, into methods and styles of disposal and divestment. Divesting responsibly has become one of the ways people sustain and recreate identity in relation to their things.

14. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.3
  Related paragraph #6JMQ9V:
      Počinkova, L., Henninger, C.E., Le Normand, A. and Blazquez Cano, M. (2023) ‘Exploring the role of community-based enterprises in consumers’ voluntary clothing disposition via UK swapping events using theory of social practice’, Social Enterprise Journal, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2023-0017

15. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.294
  Related paragraph #2HA496:
      Wheeler, K. and Glucksmann, M. (2015) Household recycling and consumption work: social and moral economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

16. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #M9WQLY CONCLUSION
  Score: 0.293
  Related paragraph #9DTFUU:
      Further research might –– move into constitution of need… (Shove and Rinkinen) In line with Warde (2005). Circular consumption is one thing, but does it matter how you get things if it’s still an overflow?

17. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.29
  Related paragraph #NYQXWE:
      Holmes, H. (2018) ‘New spaces, ordinary practices: circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning’, Geoforum, 88, pp. 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.022

18. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.288
  Related paragraph #74NCY4:
      Warde, A. (2005) ‘Consumption and theories of practice’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), pp. 131–153.

19. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.285
  Related paragraph #HYBUYH:
      Beswick-Parsons, R., Evans, D.M. and Jackson, P. (2025) ‘Reuse practices and household consumption work’, Social & Cultural Geography, 27(2), pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2025.2549709

20. Source: Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia [MIKAEL] (#4V8VH7), Ieva Lange
  Context:
    #9GJAHS LIST OF SOURCES
  Score: 0.283
  Related paragraph #GHHDFX:
      Larsen, F. (2023) ‘Selling thrift: work practices in an American thrift store’, Journal of Business Anthropology, 12(1), pp. 37–55. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v12i1.6914

### 24. Assistant

# Pulling on Shove, Pantzar & Watson 2012 in Chapter 4

Good news: Chapter 4 is already doing Shove-style work — the materials/meanings/competencies frame structures the whole chapter, and the recruitment language ("recruits and retains carriers," "plural meanings allowing recruitment") is straight out of the book. You just haven't always cited it. The book has four chapters that line up almost eerily well with what you're already arguing. Pulling them through more deliberately will make the chapter feel more theoretically anchored without requiring a lot of new prose.

Here are the highest-leverage moves, by book chapter:

---

**Book Ch 2 "Making and Breaking Links" → use in §4.1 Incoming Flow and §4.5 Letting Go**

The book argues that practices are constituted by *links* between materials, competencies and meanings, and that practices change when links are made or broken. Your single Shove citation in §4.1 (#CLU5VP, "thrift no longer expressed through darning socks") is *the example* from this chapter. You can extend the same move: divestment used to be linked to charity (one-directional aid, humpalas), and is being relinked to circulation — a Shovean reading of the historical shift you sketch in the Latvian context section. Aiga, Māra, Madara are all visibly making and breaking links in their own practice careers (Aiga's travel rupture in #Z2Y4K8 is a textbook breaking-of-links moment).

---

**Book Ch 3 "The Life of Elements" → use in §4.2 Where It Begins and §4.5 Letting Go**

This is the chapter you're underusing the most, and it's the closest match. Shove et al. talk about **modes of circulation** of practice elements — how materials are transported and accessed, how competencies migrate, how meanings get re-associated. Your chapter is literally called "Keeping Things Moving." Two specific concepts will earn their keep:

- **Packing and unpacking.** Objects arrive at Brīvbode "packed" with prior meanings (a deceased relative's, a previous owner's energy) and get unpacked and repacked with new ones. Viesturs's "Brīvbode is a kind of purgatory for things" (#Z4WUR2) is a vernacular description of exactly this — the freeshop as a site that strips off old packing so things can re-enter circulation. Naming it that way ties #Z4WUR2 to Shove directly.
- **Migration of competence and meaning.** Sorting competencies developed for the household are migrating into the freeshop and being re-learned there (Viesturs trying to systematize women's clothing, #BCDC5C). Thrift as a meaning is migrating from the home into divestment (you already note this) but *also* into curation work in §5.

---

**Book Ch 4 "Recruitment, Defection and Reproduction" → use in §4.6 Plural Meanings and §4.3 Norms and Competencies**

This is your clearest theoretical home and you're almost there already — you just don't name it. Shove's three stages map onto your material:

- **First encounters** → Madara's "at first it felt like I was stealing" (#CUBS5Q); Luīze's classmates discovering "thrift shops" (#MD2XMJ).
- **Capture and commitment / careers and carriers** → the regulars, Marija, Anna, Māra; Madara's "I really evaluate whether the thing is genuinely necessary" as competency acquisition (#9XUDV9). Marija's role-naturalisation as building logistics node (carried over into Ch 5) is a "career" in Shove's sense.
- **Daily paths and life paths** → all your divestment-trigger material (moving, renovation, deceased relatives, Aiga's travel) is exactly this. The predictable weekly rhythm (#4FP5K7, #CL5CS8) is Shove's "daily paths."

A single sentence saying "Shove et al. (2012) describe how practices recruit carriers through first encounters, capture them through deepening commitment, and lose them through defection — Brīvbode's participants exhibit all three trajectories" would give the §4.6 plural-meanings argument a much sturdier theoretical hinge.

---

**Book Ch 5 "Connections between practices: bundles and complexes" → use in chapter conclusion and possibly §4.2**

You already mention bundles/complexes in the theoretical framework (#QPWYY6) but don't return to them. The chapter conclusion's central claim — that Brīvbode "holds together incompatible orientations" — is a bundle/complex claim. Freecycling is a *bundle* of practices (divestment, acquisition, social visiting, sorting, valuation) loosely co-located rather than a single tight complex. Naming this would let you say: the moral economy is what holds the bundle together in lieu of tighter integration.

---

**One sentence on what this gets you**

The thread these four moves share is that they reframe Brīvbode not as a static site with elements, but as a practice in *motion* — recruiting carriers, packing and unpacking objects, migrating competencies, holding a loose bundle together. That dynamic register is exactly what Shove et al.'s book offers and what Chapter 4 already wants to do. You don't need to add much new prose; you mostly need to surface the vocabulary that is already running underneath the chapter.

The forest is there. You're just adding signposts.

### 25. User

tell me about the 2015 paper too!

### 26. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `get_document`

```json
{
  "id": "VJ8G58"
}
```

### 27. Tool result: get_document

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Title: Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

Outline:
  - 1 #SYB8LM Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life
    - 1.1 #A8FLF5 Abstract
    - 1.2 #ZMXJ58 Keywords
    - 1.3 #GMKS9Y Introduction
    - 1.4 #B9MCH7 Corresponding author:
    - 1.5 #95NUYH Using Diaries as a Method of Conceptualising and Representing Everyday Life
    - 1.6 #5F7YSR Using Diaries in Research
    - 1.7 #CTH94M Materiality and Temporality in the Diary Archive
    - 1.8 #QXFSJG Encountering the Object-World: The Weather, the Heating System, the Firewood
    - 1.9 #RHZRVS Acting in a Materially Constituted World: Coping with the Cold
    - 1.10 #PWG3FB Evaluating the Material World: How Heating Should be Done
    - 1.11 #4R28VE Object Relations: Insights and Conclusions
    - 1.12 #2764TA Funding
    - 1.13 #ZDKS9V References

### 28. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `read`

```json
{
  "blocks": [
    "A8FLF5",
    "GMKS9Y",
    "QXFSJG",
    "RHZRVS",
    "PWG3FB",
    "4R28VE"
  ],
  "expand": true
}
```

### 29. Tool result: read

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #A8FLF5 Abstract

EXCERPT #3SFJQZ p. 0
  Theories of social practice routinely acknowledge the significance of the material world, arguing that objects have a constitutive role in shaping and reproducing the practices of which daily life is made. Objects are also important for those who approach 'everyday life' as an ontology, a tradition in which scholarly interest in the material reaches beyond the somewhat pragmatic concerns of practice theory. In this article we identify traces of both schools of thought in the ways in which people describe their immediate material environments. By drawing on an archive of diary material, we illustrate multi-faceted object relations with reference to the example of keeping warm. We conclude that in keeping warm, diarists weave together encounters, tactics and judgements, encountering objects in ways that extend beyond the 'mere' enactment of social practice. In analysing these encounters we explore ways of conceptualising the object-world that are especially relevant for studies of everyday life.

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #GMKS9Y Introduction

EXCERPT #HFUKW9 p. 0
  Understanding how things, day-to-day practices and practitioners are mutually co-aligned is a core concern for sociologists of everyday life. Theories of social practice have recently entered this field, bringing with them a new emphasis on the constitutive

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #QXFSJG Encountering the Object-World: The Weather, the Heating System, the Firewood

EXCERPT #A66EDN p. 5
  It is almost midnight. The wind howls in the corners and in the ventilation pipes ever more loudly. The snow blowing over the roof has piled on the windowsill up to half-curtains. It is wonderful to think of sneaking underneath the blanket. Inside the heat of the oven is level. (SKS KRA, 1999: 42463)

EXCERPT #RT42YW p. 5
  Descriptive texts like this revolve around the perception, recognition and naming of entities. Diarists operating in this genre list the people, places and things that form and fill their day. Some of these accounts resemble Charles Peeree's extreme attempts to capture the everyday through the repeated cataloguing of objects in urban spaces (Peeree, 1989; see Sheringham, 2006). More commonly, such texts consist of seemingly neutral inventories of what the author sees in situ, and in the moment. There is no reference to memory, no attempt at narrative integration, and no ambition to do more than record what is 'there' (Crang, 2005). And yet these descriptions are unavoidably analytical: each item mentioned is an item that for one reason or another counts as something that is worth a mention. This significance often relates to some causal or diagnostic connection. In other words, items are referred to because they are thought to be relevant in identifying and perhaps explaining other phenomena.

EXCERPT #BYA5XN p. 5
  As in the excerpt above, and also in general, emotional or sensual thought figures as a particular form of self-observing, as when people comment on their preferences or simply state that they like some things. In accounts of this nature there is an element of

EXCERPT #AMSTPT p. 6

EXCERPT #R59QCA p. 6

EXCERPT #5VD3CM p. 6
  distancing from the practicalities and problems of everyday life, a feature which highlights the point that this mode of material engagement is simply not action oriented.

EXCERPT #J2DZPM p. 6
  As well as describing the material world, documentary accounts sometimes refer to the author as an element in the scene that is represented. This does not necessarily mean that humans are granted any special agency or purpose in what remain characteristically blank forms of reportage. In the next extract, the diarist comments on the wear and tear on his/her body as if this was just another part of the system of heating:

EXCERPT #86RMN9 p. 6
  After four o'clock I harden my mind. The frost has hit minus fourteen degrees, but one has to drag oneself to the wood pile. My back is not agreeing with this and the fingers get cold, but the remaining firewood is of such a size that it needs to be chopped. I manage to make half a wheelbarrow of chopped wood and get an idea to heat the sauna. (SKS KRA, 1999: 41200)

EXCERPT #EZ9AAA p. 6
  Even though authors refer to things that are merely present-at-hand, they are not entirely indifferent to the objects they describe. They can be evaluative and point to aesthetic and other virtues (and vices) but the point is that they do so without reference to particular uses, affordances or human interests:

EXCERPT #AGZSUC p. 6
  The frost meter indicates 21.5°. The radio confirms the degrees. I glance at the fireplace, put more wood in and enjoy the radiating heat. My eyes follow the play of the flames and I recall the many number of camp fires in the woods. FIRE is after all the best of all inventions. (SKS KRA, 1999: 42341)

EXCERPT #888FPT p. 6
  In this mode of encountering the object-world, there is an ever-present, but implicit, spatial emphasis on proximate things such as the frost meter. Descriptions of this type are confined by a sort of 'activity-place space that is a matrix of places and spaces where activities are performed' (Schatzki, 2002: 43). The temporal frame is just as constricted. There is no mention of what Schatzki (2002: 45) refers to as forms of 'prefiguration' – that is, of how present material arrangements make future combinations easier or harder to achieve – and no mention of history or of causation. Descriptions are characteristically matter of fact, and in the present:

EXCERPT #AUX3HP p. 6
  It's cold inside. I place logs in the stove and a matchstick in the curly birchbark, porridge water in the pot, and morning coffee in the kettle. [...] The kitchen warms up, the porridge water boils. The day can begin. (SKS KRA, 2009: 96)

EXCERPT #52TT6R p. 6
  Being at home I usually heat with wood and the electric radiators can cool down. When the fire was going well I felt so drowsy I went to lie down on the bed. (SKS KRA, 2009: 17)

EXCERPT #8MUZCU p. 6
  Reading a book I noticed that the living room was quite cold and I put woollen socks knitted by my daughter on top of a thinner pair. (SKS KRA, 2009: 31)

EXCERPT #HNTGV5 p. 6
  Like the flux of street-talk to which De Certeau refers (1984), this mode of writing represents a form of haphazard and random documenting. As such it is perhaps best understood not as a representation of personal mental processes but as a particularly open

EXCERPT #2F48FP p. 7

EXCERPT #RDSXJL p. 7

EXCERPT #JCB4SR p. 7
  way of being-in-the-world, and as an essentially aesthetic form of expression. This suggests that aesthetic orderings might encompass residual bits and pieces that do not fit into more purposeful schemes and categories of practical action. Alternatively, we might conclude that this mode of encountering the object-world allows us to catch sight of material entities not as entities that act, but as the 'media in which living things are immersed, and are experienced by way of their currents, forces and pressure gradients' (Ingold, 2008: 212).

EXCERPT #DGEGE9 p. 7
  To reiterate, in this kind of object-oriented writing, things are observed and named but descriptions of action, logical reasoning and moral judgement are only tentatively present (Thévenot, 2001).

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #RHZRVS Acting in a Materially Constituted World: Coping with the Cold

EXCERPT #B95ZE2 p. 7
  Accounts of practical, ongoing and responsive problem-solving represent a second mode of material engagement. Within social theory, practices are integrative structures that delineate the means and process of doing, and that simultaneously reproduce proper and desirable ends, aims and orientations (Schatzki, 2002). Diarists' descriptions of acting in a materially constituted world reproduce this double orientation. Materials consequently figure as tools required for the enactment of specific practices, and as instruments that can be handled in variously effective ways. On both counts, material surroundings are noted and noteworthy because they are actionable.

EXCERPT #HTSE4W p. 7
  When operating within this more pragmatic tradition, diarists write about how to do things and how to handle objects so as to meet the 'standards' of the practices in which they are engaged. Not surprisingly, economic and practical aspects come to the fore in reports in which people describe methods of keeping warm. The following excerpt exemplifies this approach:

EXCERPT #SEDGGB p. 7
  Frost appears to be -26C. I point out to my man that it is wise to connect the car preheating [electric heating of the engine], because he intends to drive to the city. [...] I light up the fireplace, the wood is already in there. Dry, warm wood lights up easily. We enjoy breakfast. I go back to bed and read the newspaper. My man goes to light up the boiler of the central heating, so that the house would be warm, now that there is the small baby. I stand up to add wood to the fireplace. (SKS KRA, 1999: 41978)

EXCERPT #9L8VJR p. 7
  In this case, there is a lot of planning and causal explanation. Heating systems are needed to make other things possible (getting the car started) or to make people comfortable (particularly the baby). Things are described in a synchronised, sequential manner following the series of actions in which they have a part. These deliberate actions are, in turn, organised around pre-defined goals; for example, remembering to dry sticks in the oven so that it is easier to light the fire the next day.

EXCERPT #R2Q26V p. 7
  As described below, the outside weather, and particularly the cold air, creates specific demands, mattering for how practices are enacted, sequenced and coordinated:

EXCERPT #8BGW9Z p. 7
  In the morning the meter showed 15 degrees frost, so it was a proper day for baking and cooking. (SKS KRA, 1999: 41694)

EXCERPT #PDJUSP p. 8

EXCERPT #Q5NRG5 p. 8

EXCERPT #J8G23V p. 8
  I put the dishes into the machine, and it is full since there was already some from yesterday. I can set the machine running to get hot water to the drain. (SKS KRA, 1999: 42214)

EXCERPT #J78SYW p. 8
  After getting up [from a nap] I clean out the ashes from last night, get a basket full of logs from the cellar, and stack the fireplace ready for the next fire. (SKS KRA, 2009: 78)

EXCERPT #S53FG7 p. 8
  Schatzki (2001) and Warde (2005) contend that pre-existing practices-as-entities are reproduced and transformed through repeated doings and sayings and recurrent performances. The diarists' accounts quoted here are consistent with this view, and with Bourdieu's claims that the world of practice is a world already populated by procedures to be followed and paths to be taken (Bourdieu, 1990: 53). In writing about what they do, diarists mobilise understandings of competent action within pre-existing material and social conditions. Sometimes these accounts focus on inconvenience and trouble, or on how problems have been confronted and solved, but in other cases all goes well: the pieces of the daily jigsaw slot into place. In these situations, agency, materiality and shared conventions mesh (Thévenot, 2001).

EXCERPT #SGKTZ6 p. 8
  When writing in this mode, diarists write about reciprocal relations between objects and humans. Material elements call for, carry and preserve forms of practical competence. Practical competences are initially craft-based, embedded and locally reproduced but as practices (and related materials) become more widely shared, related competences stabilise, sometimes to the point that they can be defined, taught and learned regardless of the situation (Shove et al., 2012: 50). In focusing on how practices are enacted, some entries represent a form of peer-to-peer user instruction and, as such, play a role in keeping knowledge in circulation (Shove et al., 2012; Thévenot, 2001).

EXCERPT #9YW8QS p. 8
  Practice-theoretical studies of how daily life is reproduced and enacted in an always-changing environment refer to dynamic processes that characterise ongoing sequences and chains of action (Southerton, 2006). In writing about how they 'play the game' according to pre-existing rules, and about how they excel and 'score' in everyday life, diarists show themselves to be knowledgeable and strategic actors within the ends delineated by their habits. In the most positive of these accounts, things are skilfully mobilised within a seamless flow of effective action, taking their place in the smooth running of everyday life.

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #PWG3FB Evaluating the Material World: How Heating Should be Done

EXCERPT #QBE74A p. 8
  While some diary entries are full of confidence others are riddled with uncertainty, also reporting on strains, tensions and outright conflict about how things should be done. Tactical ways of doing and coping do not always correspond to shared understandings of how life should be lived. There are, in addition, situations in which new materials or forms of knowledge disrupt existing routines and throw established habits out of kilter (De Certeau, 1984). Moreover, every method of handling the practical details of daily life is linked, in some way, to broader conditions and consequences. These challenges underpin the mode of evaluation and implicit judgement OR this mode of evaluation and implicit judgement evident in the diary data.

EXCERPT #QEEJRZ p. 9

EXCERPT #TGV888 p. 9

EXCERPT #WQ7P5C p. 9
  This mode is given expression when diarists justify or question particular practices and uses of objects. In this kind of writing, accounts of practice (for instance in the form of peer-to-peer talk and 'user instructions') invoke or refer to an evaluative framework. Descriptions of how to keep warm are consequently presented and situated in terms of an understanding of proper 'standards'; for example, of comfort or frugality (Thévenot, 2001).

EXCERPT #M4M9DU p. 9
  Such engagement is not aesthetic; it is not a matter of explaining how to do things, nor is it a disinterested description of how things are. Instead, accounts are infused with normative evaluation, affirming or challenging the worth of specific practical-material arrangements or of entire ways of living. Judgements of good and bad do not relate to private matters of convenience, ease or joy but instead refer to the wider conditions and consequences of the action. In short, this mode introduces the public eye of a 'generalised other' (Thévenot, 2001).

EXCERPT #YU2KKL p. 9
  Evaluative reflexivity implies critical distancing from one's own action: in the diary material, judgements reflect a variety of distant concerns including family traditions, the wider society or animal welfare. On the other hand, reflexivity can also prompt people to think again about their own practices, preferences and values. The following train of thought, separated by commas, flows from the details of the moment on to broader questions about how to stay warm and how to lead a proper life:

EXCERPT #R5DZS2 p. 9
  The digital watch of the VCR shows 02.20, already next day and I do not feel tired any more, night is quiet, frost behind the windows, cold, I have wool on me, the electricity of the machines warms, from lamps, does it come from nuclear or coal, I would rather live in the little red [ochre] cottage and grow my food, eat less e-codes and be more, and more naturally, part of nature, ever-lasting longing for countryside after having spent my childhood there. (SKS KRA, 1999: 297)

EXCERPT #NLL7RY p. 9
  In this extract and the next, reflexive thought and judgement are meshed with documentary-style observation typical of the first of our three categories of material engagement. In the following passage, the diarist observes the room and his own body and mind with a seemingly free-floating spirit:

EXCERPT #N8UN24 p. 9
  The day is turning into night. I look at this room. There is a lot to improve. Hundred years old house, fireplaces in the corners. Friends have been kind and fetched firewood from the basement that is so difficult to access. The firewood is piled in front of the fireplaces. The system for heating the water does not work, has not worked for the past year. And again today I have not decided anything about fixing it. I would like to think of this as a stance on consumption demands, continuous growth, maximisation of profit, the irreversible division between rich and poor. This is how I would like to think, but I wonder if it is just sloppiness. (SKS KRA, 1999: 461)

EXCERPT #N6EV4Q p. 9
  However, this description is evidently not disinterested: the history of the house seems to matter, people matter as friends, personal characters of integrity and initiative are endorsed. These evaluations depend on an understanding of how things should be, and of practical actions that should be taken. Whilst some comments refer to arrangements within the home, others concern bigger issues including the functioning of the market and related themes of equity and justice. In addition to this movement between social and

EXCERPT #V27UUR p. 10

EXCERPT #H87XX6 p. 10

EXCERPT #NKN9LH p. 10
  spatial scales, objects travel from background to foreground and back again, as illustrated in the following extract:

EXCERPT #YFUYAF p. 10
  I light up an old Siro-stove (model number 52) manufactured by Högfors. The stove gives a lovely cosy feeling. In winter time like this the fixed electric radiator (from 1972) takes care of the heating of the kitchen. I move to the dining room of our 110-year-old house, and make a fire out of logs in the original 'pönttöuuni' [a type of stove]. The height of our rooms is still 3.4 metres and the stoves too are 3.2. There's a lot to be heated in winters, even though we also partly use electricity . . . When the ignition seems to succeed, I move to the hall where I do the same tasks. (SKS KRA, 2009: 8)

EXCERPT #WFDDS3 p. 10
  This mode of evaluation and implicit judgement revolves around what MacIntyre describes as the internal value of a practice (MacIntyre, 1984). In short, practices sustain and reproduce specific understandings of what it is to do them well. In so far as practices entail the use of objects, forms of material engagement are woven into the normative framework of the practice itself (Thévenot, 2001). As indicated above, practices are not approached in isolation but are instead linked to more abstract and more strategic questions concerning the structural conditions of social action. In this way the diarists remind us that the practicalities and materialities of daily life are enmeshed in webs of moral judgement.

DOCUMENT #VJ8G58
Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life

SECTION #4R28VE Object Relations: Insights and Conclusions

EXCERPT #PFW5KY p. 10
  We started with the idea that accounts of everyday life might provide insights and understandings of how materials, practices and practitioners intersect. Our typology – arising from the diary data and from diarists' encounters with things in the world – is useful as a means of promoting and provoking developments in theories of social practice and in the sociological understanding of everyday life. It is so on five counts. First, in detailing the various ways in which material elements figure, our analysis gives a sense of how object relations switch between passive and active forms, and provides an important reminder of the extent to which these relations reflect and reproduce forms of judgement and evaluation regarding the conduct of daily life and the social order as a whole.

EXCERPT #L6UM2N p. 10
  Second, our scheme echoes diarists' representations of a world which consists of useful, meaningful and actionable objects-as-tools, on the one hand, and of a more passive material milieu on the other. The latter 'environment' is not organised around actual or possible human-tool combinations, nor does it simply consist of dormant elements waiting to be used. It is nonetheless implicated in what people do. In general terms it is clear that 'The physical compositions of humans, artifacts, organisms, and things of nature [...] structure what actions can and might be carried out when, where, how, and for what ends' (Schatzki, 2010: 137). However, it is difficult to determine when and how this kind of pre-configuration occurs or to establish the direction it might take. In writing about how objects switch from latent background to foreground and back again, the diarists describe object-worlds that are constantly in flux, indicating that the emergence (and disappearance) of practical tool-type relationships, and of identifiable modes of pre-figuration, are themselves outcomes of the ebb and flow of social practices.

EXCERPT #ZFBPG5 p. 11

EXCERPT #6AJJL8 p. 11

EXCERPT #C2WNH6 p. 11
  Taking this point further, a third contribution is to highlight the relation between the unknown, the named and the practical aspects of objects. This is a central concern for those interested in the production of value, and in how objects come to be needed, desired and discarded. There seems to be something of a sequence in which objects are initially named (and thus drawn out of the background); in which they become associated with other things and/or with human actors; and in which these associations contribute to more organised chains of action, and to the practical accomplishment of certain valued ends. Conversely, the process of falling out of use appears to be one in which links are eroded or fractured, but in which terms and labels endure for a while longer. Understanding how these bonds are made and broken depends on understanding the emergence (and dissolution) of relevant communities of practice; that is, of groups of people who have some shared understanding of the 'value' of an object, typically related to an also shared capacity to use it/integrate it in practice. Of course some might argue that objects 'create' homogenised collectives and communities of practice around themselves (Wenger, 1998). Either way, it is important to understand how such communities bring object relations into being, and vice versa.

EXCERPT #PL4EBV p. 11
  Fourth, diarists' accounts tend to focus on tasks and projects involving the use of many objects at once: they only rarely deal with one object at a time. This is indicative of the actual co-existence of objects and the structures of usefulness and justification that exists around them. In highlighting this feature, the Finnish diarists remind us of the fact that practices are enacted in a world of tools and objects that move in and out of immediate 'usefulness', and that are simultaneously significant as potential resources for future projects and/or as currently redundant remains of past endeavours. In approaching objects in the plural, diarists provide further insight into how things are drawn out of the background (in which they figure as part of the context or environment), how they become topics of immediate attention, and how they sink into the background again. In Ingold's words, 'everything may be something, but being something is always on the way to becoming something else' (Ingold, 2011: 3). As the diarists demonstrate, in the world of materials, nothing is ever complete: materials are thus substances-in-becoming (Barad, 2003: 822). They carry on, overtaking the formal roles that, at one time or another, have been assigned to them.

EXCERPT #LRZS5E p. 11
  Finally, in writing about encountering, acting in and evaluating the object-world, diarists inadvertently draw attention to the different temporalities of material engagement. This is a theme that deserves more explicit attention within social theories of practice, and within studies of everyday life. To elaborate, when diarists report on their encounters with the material world they report on a world in which objects appear to be stable – they are present-at-hand – suggesting a form of a-temporality . In such accounts, objects appear frozen in time and space, as if caught in a photographic snap-shot. Sometimes there are hints that objects have an active life but, for the most part, diarists writing in this mode rarely refer either to the past or to the future (Beyes and Steyaert, 2011). By contrast, accounts of things in action emphasise both the flow of events and the need for sequencing, synchronisation and temporal coordination. When describing causes and consequences, diarists move back and forth in time, extending the temporal scope of their account well beyond the moment of doing. Practice-theoretical studies do the same: analysing the lives of practices as they unfold over time, and describing the responses

EXCERPT #JLDQ2X p. 12

EXCERPT #262E6Z p. 12

EXCERPT #Y9SK6R p. 12
  and actions of practitioners (those who do) within the ongoing flow of daily life. Finally, those whose accounts are more overtly judgemental move between seemingly universal, atemporal descriptions of how things should be , and more specific evaluations of a particular action or event.

EXCERPT #YBKRQV p. 12
  In various guises, time is an already important topic within social practice theory. There has been some discussion of time either as a resource on which practices depend or as something that is made by and through the recurrent enactment of different practices (Shove et al., 2012; Southerton, 2013). Rhythms, sequences and synchronisations are critical in characterising the timespace of practices (e.g. Jalas and Rinkinen, 2013; Shove et al., 2012; Southerton, 2013), and in accounting for their development (Blue, 2013). What is missing, and what the diarists' temporally sensitive accounts of material engagement provide, is an understanding of how the hardware of daily life is situated in time, and how that situating is in part defined by the changing roles that objects play before, within and beyond moments of practical action.

EXCERPT #787SWU p. 12
  In conclusion, in describing ways of keeping warm on a winter's day, the diarists reveal a range of co-existing but nonetheless distinct modes of material engagement. In this article we have drawn out these lay theoretical constructs, and drawn attention to their relevance for theoretical development within the social sciences. For sociologists of the everyday, this exercise underlines the centrality of object relations and of their temporal reach: in this it shows that the realm of the everyday is not simply a realm of immediate experience. For theorists of social practice, it provides a more subtle and a more complex account of how material arrangements play out in practice. It does so by recognising forms of material engagement which are evidently not related to the ongoing enactment of specific practices and which resist and are opposed to coherent or rational narrative ordering, but which nonetheless constitute crucial aspects of everyday experience. In addition, it provides an account of how object relations evolve and of how things simultaneously exist as elements in a flat 'background', as dynamic components of ongoing action, and as sites and vectors of judgement and evaluation. This helps fill out an otherwise overly 'functional' view of things which concentrates on moments of use and utility, underplaying their uncertain, ambivalent and contested role in the conduct of daily life, and underestimating the overlapping and multiple temporal registers through which object relations are defined. On all fronts the diarists encourage us not to settle on static schemes and categories, but to focus on the multiplicity of co-existing object relations and to think about how temporal frames swing into and out of view.

EXCERPT #9SRBC4 p. 12
  We end with a note on method. Diary collections such as the one we have used effectively turn citizens into ethnographers, valuing and archiving what some might think of as volumes of insignificant detail. For us, the very unstructured nature of the diary-writing process proved crucial. If diarists had been given more direction, and if the Finnish Literature Society had sought to make the diary process 'useful' for research, it would have been difficult and perhaps impossible to map genres and styles of representing object relations or to 'see' the various modes of engagement to which these styles relate – and on which much of our theoretical insight depends.

EXCERPT #R8Z5BF p. 12
  This brings us to our own role. In working through the diary material, and in sorting it out, we have come up with a three-part scheme, distinguishing between modes of encountering, acting in, and evaluating the object-world. We have been able to use this

EXCERPT #MBZZ5U p. 13

EXCERPT #TYPJ48 p. 13

EXCERPT #36ETED p. 13
  scheme to some effect, identifying gaps, pointing to new agendas and providing fresh ways of thinking about how people, practices and things interact. Nonetheless, some might accuse us of squashing rich accounts of daily life 'into discrete enclaves of activity and reflection' (Highmore, 2001) and ironically disregarding the complexity and disorder on which our 'analysis' depends. A first response is to reiterate the point that our three-part scheme is a device with which to expand theoretical understanding of object relations in practice. A second is to underline the point that the categories with which we have worked are indeed arbitrary, leaky and co-existent. We have used brief extracts to illustrate and exemplify differences between modes of representing and relating to things but in most of the diaries writers move with ease between passages of 'flat' documentary description, practical talk of doing and coping, and reflexive judgement.

EXCERPT #99WWAE p. 13
  In switching between different 'voices', diarists are engaged in various forms of involvement and presentation of self. Not surprisingly, those who write about practical projects and accomplishments frequently present themselves as competent, clever and thoughtful actors capable of managing the challenges of daily life and of providing useful advice to others: in short, doing and evaluation are never far apart. In addition, it is important to remember that diary writing is a process in its own right. The business of documenting and cataloguing the experiences of the day often prompts reflection and evaluation of one's own routine. These features, along with endless inconsistencies, make the diary data what it is. They also make it a useful resource, allowing us to catch sight of how material objects and social practices hang together.

### 30. Assistant

# Shove, Rinkinen & Jalas 2015 "Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life"

This one is shorter and weirder than the book — it's a Finnish diary-archive study about how people write about keeping warm — but it's surprisingly useful for Chapter 4 because the whole paper is about **how objects shift in and out of practical engagement**, which is what Brīvbode is doing constantly.

## The argument

Drawing on diaries about heating, the authors identify three modes of object relations:

1. **Encountering** — objects as present-at-hand, named but not yet acted on. Aesthetic, descriptive, in the flat "background" of the world.
2. **Acting in** — objects as tools, integrated into sequenced, purposeful doing. Practice in the Schatzki/Shove sense.
3. **Evaluating** — objects as sites of moral and normative judgement. Things become occasions for reflection on how life should be lived.

Their core point: the same object switches between these registers, and **a thing's "usefulness" is not given but emerges and dissolves through these shifts** — "everything may be something, but being something is always on the way to becoming something else" (citing Ingold).

Five takeaway claims at the end (#PFW5KY–#LRZS5E):

- Object relations toggle between passive and active forms.
- Objects exist as both equipment-tools and as ambient material milieu, and the line between them is in flux.
- There's a sequence by which objects get drawn out of the background, named, associated, integrated into chains of action — and a reverse sequence by which they fall out of use.
- People rarely deal with one object at a time; objects move in and out of "immediate usefulness" together, as bundles.
- Object relations have different temporalities — frozen present-at-hand, sequenced action-time, atemporal moral evaluation.

## Why this is great for your Chapter 4

This paper is almost embarrassingly well-suited to what Brīvbode actually is — a site where objects are *visibly* moving between Shove et al.'s three modes. A few specific places it can land:

**§4.1 Incoming Flow (Divestment).** Divestment is exactly the "falling out of use" sequence the paper describes — links erode, the object slips from foreground to background, but "terms and labels endure for a while longer." This is what Aiga's "inner feeling that won't let me throw it away" (#AB5XLD) and Elīna's responsibility-to-pass-on (#5NWUSK) are doing — keeping the *label* of usefulness alive even when the *practice* of use has ended. Brīvbode functions as the institutional bridge in that sequence.

**§4.2 The Site as Active Flow.** Your point about objects piling up on the sorting table, the ceramic plate that "got swallowed" (#3USBHB), things being put on the shelf and disappearing — this is objects moving back and forth between background and foreground in real time. Shove et al.'s "objects switch from latent background to foreground and back again" is a near-perfect description of what Brīvbode does materially. You could cite this directly.

**§4.5 Letting Go: Attachment Without Price.** This is the strongest connection. The paper's *temporality* point (#LRZS5E) — that object relations have multiple temporal registers — is exactly your argument about how price normally anchors attachment over time, and how Brīvbode produces a different temporality (try, return, swap on the spot, low-stakes acquisition). The "trial period" in #34Z7TB is a Shove-Rinkinen-Jalas style temporal observation.

**§4.6 Plural Meanings of Acquisition.** Madara's craftsperson's gaze (#D4H3PB) — the mosquito net no one else saw value in — is a textbook case of an object being drawn out of the background and re-named, becoming associated with a new chain of action (her embroidery practice). The paper's claim that "communities of practice" bring object relations into being could be cited here: Madara's competency lets her see what others can't.

**§4.7 Quiet or Reflected Sustainability.** Your variation between practitioners who articulate sustainability and those who don't maps directly onto the paper's distinction between **acting in** (Viesturs and Rasa, doing without philosophical justification) and **evaluating** (Luīze, framing in terms of fast fashion and microtrends). You're already making this distinction empirically — the paper gives it a name.

## Bottom line

The 2012 book gives you the **dynamic register** for Chapter 4 (recruitment, careers, packing/unpacking, modes of circulation). The 2015 paper gives you a **finer-grained vocabulary for what objects are doing in any given moment** — sliding between background presence, active use, and moral evaluation. The two complement each other neatly: the book is about the dynamics of practices over time; the paper is about the dynamics of object relations within practice.

If you want one specific place to cite the 2015 paper, I'd put it in §4.5 around the temporality of attachment, where it does the most distinctive work the book can't quite do.

### 31. User

let's poke around the library to see if some other of our cited works or good juicy papers etc have useful truly relevant stuff related to similar aspects, the purgatory, the kind of autonomous zone or regime that's not really part of supply chains or um i guess hm this is the hobson paper we imported recently on closing the loop... also gimme a lucid walkthrough of ch4 and what its doing...

### 32. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `search_text`

```json
{
  "document_kind": "literature",
  "limit": 8,
  "query": "generative space circular economy alternative regime value"
}
```

#### Tool call: `search_text`

```json
{
  "document_kind": "literature",
  "limit": 8,
  "query": "threshold liminal between owners purgatory transition object biography"
}
```

#### Tool call: `search_text`

```json
{
  "document_kind": "literature",
  "limit": 8,
  "query": "heterotopia autonomous space outside market exchange diverse economies"
}
```

#### Tool call: `search_text`

```json
{
  "document_kind": "literature",
  "limit": 8,
  "query": "moral economy non-monetary exchange reuse second-hand sorting valuation"
}
```

### 33. Tool result: search_text

Exact matches

1. Source: Repair for a Broken Economy: Lessons for Circular Economy from an International Interview Study of Repairers (#4YG3VP), Duncan McLaren, Johan Niskanen, Jonas Anshelm, p. 0
  Context:
    #LVPP8A Repair for a Broken Economy: Lessons for Circular Economy from an International Interview Study of Repairers
  Matching excerpt #4TVHFQ:
      Abstract: The idea of replacing the broken linear economy with circular forms to help address the current sustainability crisis is gaining world-wide traction in policy, industry, and academia. This article presents results from an international interview study with 34 repair practitioners and experts in different fields. The article aims to improve understandings of the potential of repair so as to contribute to a more just, sustainable, and circular economy. Through a five-step qualitative method the results reveal and explore three tensions inherent in repair: first, repair activities constitute different forms of subjectivity; second, repair entails different and sometimes contested temporalities; and finally, even though repair is deeply political in practice, the politics of repair are not always explicit, and some repair activities are actively depoliticized. The opportunities and obstacles embodied in these tensions are generative in repair practices and debates, but poorly reflected in contemporary circular economy discourse. We conclude that a richer, more inclusive, and politicized understanding of repair can support environmental justice in the implementation of circular economy (CE) and provide greater opportunities for just and transformational sustainability strategies and policies.

2. Source: Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle (#59QUM6), Sally Eden, p. 17
  Context:
    #5V87AY Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle
      #R7UR8J Discussion
  Matching excerpt #AXJJ7T:
      These diverse practices affect three implosions of key binaries: (1) consumption/production, (2) digital/material and (3) mainstream/alternative. Freecycling is, thus, prosumptive, rather than solely consumptive, and this prosumption is performed through digital and material practices of exchange and moral ordering. It is also circular, not only challenging the linearity of traditional perspectives on waste disposal but also pulling mainstream retailing and consuming vocabularies and representations into a supposedly alternative, ethically and environmentally driven space. I use 'circular consumption' to capture these non-linear, non-binary processes of revaluing and exchanging. This also resonates with practice theory because circular consumption emphasises the repeated enactment and interactions between things, skills (both virtual in the form of online postings and material in the form of repair) and people, and this collective circularity creates and re-creates value of/through things.

3. Source: On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair & Care (#CUWPC9), Cindy Isenhour, Joshua Reno, p. 0
  Context:
    #3YJ9P3 On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair &amp; Care
  Matching excerpt #LZDQ9D:
      The reimagining and revaluation of discarded goods, through repair and reuse is, for many, a quotidian and mundane element of everyday life. These practices are the historical precedent and continue to be the stuff of common sense for a significant portion of human society. And yet, reuse, repair and other elements of a 'circular economy' have recently emerged as a significant focus in environmental and economic policy. Proponents claim that reuse practices represent a potentially radical alternative to mainstream consumer culture and a form of carework that generates new social possibilities and personal affects. This essay explores the myriad dimensions of reuse as care, relational practice and as consumer alternative by examining these practices in their social context, lived experience and as embedded within larger political and economic structures of capitalist accumulation and abandonment. We argue that the study of reuse, in old and new forms, takes on added political significance in an era of environmental and economic crises, especially as a critical part of state-based approaches toward the circular economy that attempt to appropriate carework in new forms of value generation.

4. Source: Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review (#PSBVW7), Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero, p. 0
  Context:
    #HHKK3Q Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review
      #RRR7Y9 1. Introduction
  Matching excerpt #5QVW6D:
      A circular economy (CE) aims at decoupling value creation from waste generation and resource use [1] by radically transforming production and consumption systems [2]. Most of the literature on the circular economy seems to focus on the production side, exploring circular business models [3], strategies to develop circular value propositions [4], and the benefits of such models [5]. Less attention seems to have been paid to how consumption and consumers would affect or be affected by the circular economy [2]. As suggested by Hobson et al. [6] the circular economy might translate into significant changes in people’s everyday lives, but there seems to be little understanding of such alterations in the scientific literature, and the policies promoting the circular economy [7]. Among such changes are the

5. Source: Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review (#PSBVW7), Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero, p. 0
  Context:
    #HHKK3Q Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review
  Matching excerpt #N94NFW:
      Abstract: A circular economy (CE) aims at decoupling value creation from waste generation and resource use by radically transforming production and consumption systems. Recent reviews on the topic of the circular economy have indicated that cultural barriers are a significant factor hindering the diffusion of so-called ‘circular’ business models, particularly the lack of consumer—or user—acceptance. However, none of them has provided an overview of the existing literature addressing such issues that can help academics and practitioners better understand consumption considerations when addressing the circular economy. Motivated by these observations, this paper presents the results of a literature review that summarises and discusses insights from 111 articles in terms of the problem area, theoretical approaches, methods, and tools that have been used to collect and analyse data, the main issues, and identified research gaps. The results show that most of the existing scientific work on the circular economy and circular solutions addressing consumption has focussed on identifying factors that drive or hinder the consumption of circular solutions. A smaller but expanding set of articles has focussed on offering insights into the nature, meaning, and dynamics of consumption in the context of the circular economy. According to this set of articles, consumption in the circular economy is anonymous, connected, political, uncertain, and based on multiple values, not only utility. A smaller set of papers has explored the integration of user and consumer perspectives into design processes. Although these contributions are relevant, opportunities for further research are still open, particularly regarding socio-material and cultural aspects of consumption in the context of the circular economy, and the role of digitalisation. In addition, more work could be done regarding strategies to foster not only acceptance but also the adoption and diffusion of the circular economy. Based on the findings of this literature review, some ideas for a research agenda on the issue of consumption in the circular economy are outlined.

6. Source: Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review (#PSBVW7), Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero, p. 2
  Context:
    #HHKK3Q Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review
      #ZNHCPN 2. Background
        #48MHB9 2.1. Circular Economy and Circular Solutions
  Matching excerpt #CUCH48:
      Following Kirchherr et al., in a circular economy, materials and products should be reused, recycled, and recovered instead of discarded, if not reduced. Companies aiming at becoming circular should offer solutions based on such activities. In order to decide what solutions could be considered circular, we turned to the literature on circular business models. In 2014, Accenture [13] suggested five types of circular business models: circular supplies, resource recovery, product life extension, sharing platforms, and product as service. Later, Bocken et al. [14] suggested the access performance model, extending product value, classic long life, encouraging sufficiency, extending resource value, and industrial symbiosis as circular business model strategies. In a more systematic fashion, Lewandowski [4] presented over 25 different business models corresponding to the ReSOLVE (regenerate, share, optimise, loop, virtualise, and exchange) framework by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation [15]. Despite these efforts, clear definitions of circular business models and circular value propositions are still lacking

7. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 4
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #B786P5 4. The case studies
        #ZGCPZT 4.1. Case study 1: Coffee Club
  Matching excerpt #K3YPUP:
      In the space of coffee club the material value of the provisioning objects, the food/tea and coffee, comes to be worth much more than its actual monetary value. As Kate notes 'because there's a sociable eating and drinking element, it makes people relaxed, and they want to chat'. Thus, the food acts as a conduit to provisioning much more than just itself, but also enables the circulating and sharing of less tangible and more emotional types of support. Thus Coffee Club's 'circular economy' is more than just materials. Yet, returning to the work of Pahl (1984: 137), none of these practices are new, 'the norms of reciprocity and complexity of social relationships surround the transaction'. These ordinary practices are embedded in the social relationships created by Coffee Club. What is extraordinary is the 'generative' (Hobson,

8. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 6
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #B786P5 4. The case studies
        #8QGCD4 4.2. Case Study 2: Clothes swap
  Matching excerpt #8BFNRS:
      As per Coffee Club, clothes swap offers a diverse economic space alive with the practices of sharing and circularity, materially stabilised by the very stuff of provisioning. According to WRAP (2016), 350, 000 tonnes of clothing is sent to landfill every year, whilst 30% of clothes in UK wardrobes have not been worn for at least a year. Whilst it could be contended that clothes swapping simply fulfils the same role as charity shops in re-circulating and re-purposing unwanted goods, there is an argument to be made that the practice of swapping encourages people to consider items in their wardrobes which are neither 'waste' nor 'want', but somewhere in a grey space of neither (see: Woodward, 2015 for a similar discussion regarding clothing; Gregson, 2007; Hetherington, 2004 on general household objects; and also Evans, 2012 on food). Whilst anything can be sent to a charity shop and a great deal of it is sent for 'ragging' (Gregson et al., 2002; Norris, 2005), certain assumptions and judgements are made about what is suitable for swapping, and for others (soon to be known others) to see, touch, feel and potentially wear. Rebecca notes how people 'like to bring clothes or accessories that have been more special to them and are eager to see them go to a good home.' Often these items have a particular biography, such as a Ted Baker dress, brought along by one participant who recognised its kudos as a high end brand, but said it 'just was not her style', preferring something more 'biker' than 'floaty and feminine'. Others valued items because of particular sentiments they attached to them, such as remembering certain occasions when they had worn them, or perhaps people who had bought the items for them. For example, one woman bought along a pair of ornate clip-on earrings given to her by her mother-in-law. She loved the earrings but found them too uncomfortable to wear, hence why she wanted to bring them to the swap. Other biographies included items which no longer fitted, but because of their material qualities – made of valued materials such as wool and silk – participants wanted to ensure they got a second life. Thus, the value placed upon the clothing in terms of its life cycle, future possibilities and material state becomes critical to its circular status. Lee (2010: 277) talks about economic geographies as 'material circuits of value, by means of which value is consumed, exchanged and produced through time and across space'. This is brought to life by Rebecca's practice of taking any leftover clothing to her local church for people to take, and anything still left over goes to the charity shop. Whilst this conveys the inherent domestic circular economy of the clothes swap, it also takes this one step further by illustrating that there are varying stages to the circular process, not unlike the now well-known food waste pyramid (see: http://www.feeding5k.org/businesses+casestudies.php ). Something similar can be seen with how Coffee Club passes on and recirculates surplus items to the school's breakfast club to avoid waste. In both instances, a process of circulation occurs through time and space, whereby items which have not been used as

Approximate matches

1. Source: Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy (#8ZKAT7), Kersty Hobson, p. 0
  Context:
    #ECVDXM Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy
      #7JJN4G Keywords
  Score: 0.638
  Related excerpt #FJJWUG:
      circular economy, materialities, product service system, prosumer

2. Source: Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy (#8ZKAT7), Kersty Hobson, p. 0
  Context:
    #ECVDXM Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy
      #BWE4XA Abstract
  Score: 0.624
  Related excerpt #AKL7LC:
      Heightened concerns about long-term sustainability have of late enlivened debates around the circular economy (CE). Defined as a series of restorative and regenerative industrial systems, parallel socio-cultural transformations have arguably received less consideration to date. In response, this paper examines the contributions human geographical scholarship can make to CE debates, focusing on ‘generative spaces’ of diverse CE practices. Concepts infrequently discussed within human geography such as product service systems and ‘prosumption’ are explored, to argue that productive potential exists in bringing these ideas into conversation with ongoing human geographical research into practices, materialities, emergent political spaces and ‘everyday activism’.

3. Source: Freecycling Markets as Sustainable Materialist Movements? Closing Reuse Circularity Loops in Singapore (#FHZZ6U), Brenda S.A. Yeoh, Qian Hui Tan, p. 11
  Context:
    #8BW5TM 7. CONCLUSION
  Score: 0.624
  Related excerpt #F6T6VP:
      Most market attendees partake in redirecting/reconfiguring linear material flows and subverting normative consumption patterns by driving 'new circulations' – rescuing, recirculating and ultimately reusing things, even if for a short period of time. Not unlike systems thinking that undergirds a circular logic, we have shown that 'energy' (i.e. volunteer, relational labour) as well as material inputs (i.e. things for recirculating, an available/accessible venue) are required for sustaining free(cycling) markets, and that this can only be accomplished as a community. Social relationalities, including collaborations among community groups are pivotal in lubricating alternative 'new circulations' that close material loops.

4. Source: Freecycling Markets as Sustainable Materialist Movements? Closing Reuse Circularity Loops in Singapore (#FHZZ6U), Brenda S.A. Yeoh, Qian Hui Tan, p. 0
  Context:
    #Q7N47M ABSTRACT
      #9A563U KEYWORDS:
  Score: 0.616
  Related excerpt #8S6R7F:
      Circular economy, R-behaviours, sustainable materialism, reuse, rescue, recirculation

5. Source: Consumption Work in the circular economy: A research agenda. (#NUEUVY), Dan Welch, Harald Wieser, Helen Holmes, Katy Wheeler, Kersty Hobson, p. 0
  Context:
    #N9U32S Consumption Work in the circular economy: A research agenda.
      #A5NUHL 1. Introduction: circular economy and Consumption Work
  Score: 0.62
  Related excerpt #2NQ5LR:
      'Circular Economy' (CE) is now central to debates and interventions that aim to transition systems towards greater environmental sustainability. While definitions abound, CE is commonly understood as transforming inter-linked production-consumption systems to ones 'where the value of products, materials and resources is maintained in the economy for as long as possible, and the generation of waste minimised' (European Commission, 2015: 2). Such transformations involve step-changes to industrial processes and product design, as well as reconfigured business models—for example from 'sale-and-ownership' to 'product service systems' (Mylan, 2015)—that in turn impact consumption patterns, practices and norms. Although sometimes presented as a new framework, CE has its roots in fields such as industrial ecology (e.g. Clift and Druckman, 2016); sustainable and 'cradle-to-cradle' design (McDonough and Braungart, 2002); and 'natural capitalism' (Hawken et al., 1999): fields with their own histories of debate, experimentation and implementation (Reike et al., 2018).

6. Source: Consumption Work in the circular economy: A research agenda. (#NUEUVY), Dan Welch, Harald Wieser, Helen Holmes, Katy Wheeler, Kersty Hobson, p. 0
  Context:
    #N9U32S Consumption Work in the circular economy: A research agenda.
      #A5NUHL 1. Introduction: circular economy and Consumption Work
  Score: 0.616
  Related excerpt #CYNPVN:
      transformations. However, as Gregson et al. (2015: 221) note, despite 'idealized visions of the circular economy' that propose a producer-led, industrial revolution, much CE policy and practice thus far is largely one of enhanced, post-consumer waste management. Nevertheless, the European Union and China are amongst those now aligning their 21st Century regional development and competitiveness agendas with the perceived advantages of CE (e.g. see European Commission, 2015; McDowall et al., 2017). According to the European Commission (2015: 2) this will help in 'protecting businesses against scarcity of resources and volatile prices' while creating improved system efficiencies, new jobs, and greater 'social integration and cohesion'.

7. Source: Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review (#PSBVW7), Casper Boks, Ida Nilstad Pettersen, Juana Camacho-Otero, p. 0
  Context:
    #HHKK3Q Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review
      #RRR7Y9 1. Introduction
  Score: 0.616
  Related excerpt #5QVW6D:
      A circular economy (CE) aims at decoupling value creation from waste generation and resource use [1] by radically transforming production and consumption systems [2]. Most of the literature on the circular economy seems to focus on the production side, exploring circular business models [3], strategies to develop circular value propositions [4], and the benefits of such models [5]. Less attention seems to have been paid to how consumption and consumers would affect or be affected by the circular economy [2]. As suggested by Hobson et al. [6] the circular economy might translate into significant changes in people’s everyday lives, but there seems to be little understanding of such alterations in the scientific literature, and the policies promoting the circular economy [7]. Among such changes are the

8. Source: Material culture and the circular economy (#R69WZQ), Elizabeth Shove, Jenny Rinkinen, p. 0
  Context:
    #J8TDC3 Material culture and the circular economy
      #7H9E6C KEYWORDS
  Score: 0.636
  Related excerpt #EUZWN7:
      circular economy, material culture, object relations, repair, sharing, re-use, material flow

### 34. Tool result: search_text

Exact matches

1. Source: An order of distinction (or, how to tell a collection from a hoard) (#5Y2AD9), Katie Kilroy-Marac, p. 14
  Context:
    #HJD229 An order of distinction (or, how to tell a collection from a hoard)
      #GX6GGN Attentiveness and attachment: How to handle things
  Matching excerpt #5T4X3U:
      If such discourses about hoarding underscore tactility, closeness, and the collapsing of subject and object, contemporary representations of collecting disavow the tactile in celebration of the visual presentation of display, described above, and the management of distance between subject and object. Indeed, the most prized collectors’ items are often those which have never been removed from their original packaging. As I have discussed elsewhere (Kilroy-Marac, 2016), some techniques that POs use with their clients actually attempt to transition them from a tactile mode to a visual mode of being with things. This helps their clients loosen their attachments to their possessions, thereby putting them at a ‘proper’ distance.

2. Source: From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary (#BJ6B3C), Zsuzsa Gille, p. 35
  Context:
    #94RWTV Contents
      #F7CFTW two Toward a Social Theory of Waste
        #HR3WZZ Waste Has an Immanent Spatiality
  Matching excerpt #BXW2K7:
      Waste, to wit, is not merely a matter out of place, as those following Douglas argue, but, more profoundly, a concept out of order. Similarly to other hard-to-classify events scrutinized by anthropology, such as hermaphroditism (Geertz 1983), or ritually marked points in an individual's or a group's life, in which they are suspended between two states (Turner 1990 [1969]; Van Gennep 1960), waste is a liminal or boundary object. I am not the first one to propose this: Thompson understands waste as being in a transitional position from the perspective of value, and Moser sees waste as a boundary object between inside and outside and between past and present (Moser 2000; Thompson 1979). Since for them this is simply an interesting fact with no further social consequences and with no roots in the larger social context, liminality becomes the end of the argument rather than its beginning. I would argue that waste's liminality goes deeper and is more complex. First, waste's liminality is multiple: that is, waste can be and is conceptualized as a "no-man's-land" between several dichotomies, such as the ones I listed above, which in practice means that there is a lot at stake in classificatory practices and struggles, certainly a lot more than technical and economic debates would have us believe. Second, the liminality of waste means that waste issues always involve the guarding or the breaking down of certain boundaries, that is, moral discourses will always play an important role in social struggles and policy decisions involving waste. Thus, dismissing morality as immaterial and secondary to some underlying economic conflict will skew our analysis of waste politics. Finally, because of this classificatory anxiety, waste may also prove to be a good lens through

3. Source: Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically (#BX2YWY), Amiria Henare, Martin Holbraad, Sari Wastell, p. 186
  Context:
    #XMHPHT DIFFERENTIATION AND ENCOMPASSMENT
      #5P9FDY Gell's theory of the abduction of agency
        #XUD9UU Differentiation
  Matching excerpt #2AK3NZ:
      The object, made of multiple relational inputs, is another kind of ‘person’ that stands for the persons who authored it. But despite this being exactly the description of objects that Gell uses (‘there is an insensible transition between “works of art” in artefact form and human beings: in terms of the networks of human social agency, they may be regarded as almost entirely

4. Source: Growing in Motion: The Circulation of Used Things on Second-hand Markets (#MBXQXR), Anna Bohlin, Staffan Appelgren, p. 13
  Context:
    #3U9XEW Growing in Motion: The Circulation of Used Things on Second-hand Markets1
      #4GET4T Gifts, Commodities and the Hybrid Second-hand Thing
  Matching excerpt #MW6Z9B:
      First cycle commodities are, ideally, disembedded from the production process and the people involved in it, drawing only on the relationships to other commodities on the market place for their value. They typically enable a solitary and unrestricted object-subject-relationship between the thing and the owner. In contrast, second-hand objects are defined by having a prior history. Like gifts, they are already to some extent embedded into social networks, and implicate their buyers in a potentially more open and porous form of ownership than that of first cycle commodities. Acquiring their defining characteristics through their prior circulation and social entanglement, they form a hybrid category, combining elements of both the commodity form and the gift form. Whereas ‘pure’ commodities are contingent on techniques of social forgetting and veiling (commodity fetishism), second-hand objects, like gifts, are dependent on energies of social remembering and disclosure. In other words, how the social history and cultural biography of the object is remembered may affect not only its value, but transform its ontological status, as will be explored below.

5. Source: The Social Life of Things (#PB2Z6X), Arjun Appadurai, p. 8
  Context:
    #YP5HNF Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
      #67JJCW Paths and diversions
  Matching excerpt #MTVWN2:
      Commodities, as Igor Kopytoff points out, can usefully be regarded as having life histories. In this processual view, the commodity phase of the life history of an object does not exhaust its biography; it is culturally regulated; and its interpretation is open to individual manipulation to some degree. Further, as Kopytoff also points out, the question of what sorts of object may have what sorts of biography is more deeply a matter for social contest and individual taste in modern societies than in smaller-scale, nonmonetized, preindustrial ones. There is, in Kopytoff's model, a perennial and universal tug-of-war between the tendency of all economies to expand the jurisdiction of commoditization and of all cultures to restrict it. Individuals, in this view, can go with either tendency as it suits their interests or matches their sense of moral appropriateness, though in premodern societies the room for maneuver is usually not great. Of the many virtues of Kopytoff's model the most important, in my view, is that it proposes a general processual model of commoditization, in which objects may be moved both into and out of the commodity state. I am less comfortable with the opposition between singularization and commoditization, since some of the most interesting cases (in what Kopytoff agrees are in the middle zone of his ideal-typical contrast) involve the more or less permanent commoditizing of singularities.

6. Source: The Social Life of Things (#PB2Z6X), Arjun Appadurai, p. 7
  Context:
    #YP5HNF Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
      #C5YXUJ Paths and diversions
  Matching excerpt #RFR7CA:
      Commodities, as Igor Kopytoff points out, can usefully be regarded as having life histories. In this processual view, the commodity phase of the life history of an object does not exhaust its biography; it is culturally regulated; and its interpretation is open to individual manipulation to some degree. Further, as Kopytoff also points out, the question of what sorts of object may have what sorts of biography is more deeply a matter for social contest and individual taste in modern societies than in smaller-scale, nonmonetized, preindustrial ones. There is, in Kopytoff's model, a perennial and universal tug-of-war between the tendency of all economies to expand the jurisdiction of commoditization and of all cultures to restrict it. Individuals, in this view, can go with either tendency as it suits their interests or matches their sense of moral appropriateness, though in premodern societies the room for maneuver is usually not great. Of the many virtues of Kopytoff's model the most important, in my view, is that it proposes a general processual model of commoditization, in which objects may be moved both into and out of the commodity state. I am less comfortable with the opposition between singularization and commoditization, since some of the most interesting cases (in what Kopytoff agrees are in the middle zone of his ideal-typical contrast) involve the more or less permanent commoditizing of singularities.

Approximate matches

1. Source: Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture (Cultures of Consumption) (#3N7TTE), Elizabeth Shove, Frank Trentmann, Richard Wilk, p. 176
  Context:
    #LS8EXH List of Tables and Figures
      #5LG7UD Buying Time
        #AH2ULX Buying the Patina of the Past
  Score: 0.507
  Related excerpt #DT46AU:
      At this point I want to take this paradox back into the frame of anthropological reasoning by examining it in more general and comparative terms, starting with an entirely different social and cultural context and then exploring an opposition within a UK setting. The first case is drawn from a paper called 'Rituals of Death as a Context for Understanding Personal Property in Socialist Mongolia', by Caroline Humphrey (2002). This starts with one of the fundamental contradictions of materiality itself (Miller 2005), where objects are used to express the desire to transcend the material, here within a Buddhist context. When a person amongst the Buryat peoples whom Humphrey studied is close to death, certain treasured objects are taken away from them, to help them separate from desire and enter more smoothly into this other state. This is even more important after they have died since there is a category of material culture called refuge objects that the dead soul still desires and wishes to return to. An astrologer identifies these and they are either destroyed, given away or buried with the corpse. So one category of objects is considered too personal, too intimate for them to be inherited or even to survive.

2. Source: Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? (#4UEQN8), Gretchen M. Herrmann, p. 3
  Context:
    #QF9LBR gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale?
      #FJYHT6 gift and commodity
  Score: 0.499
  Related excerpt #Y8D8UL:
      At one pole are what I call possessions, objects that inalienably bear the personal identities of the people who have them, of those from whom those people received them, and of the personal relationship between givers and receivers. . . . At the other pole are what I call commodities, objects that carry no personal identities, being alienated from those who have them, from those from whom they received them, and from the relationship between givers and receivers. [1994:361]

3. Source: Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? (#4UEQN8), Gretchen M. Herrmann, p. 3
  Context:
    #QF9LBR gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale?
      #FJYHT6 gift and commodity
  Score: 0.488
  Related excerpt #PT2P2M:
      In this article, I use James Carrier's (1990b, 1994) definition of the term possession to speak of the gift end of garage sale exchange. Since garage sale goods are already appropriated and broken in by their original owners, they are possessions , a term Carrier uses to distinguish items that involve Maussian embeddedness in relationship:

4. Source: Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage (#7BM5AQ), Sasha Newell, p. 2
  Context:
    #29MY8X Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage
      #23FBJ8 KEYWORDS
  Score: 0.528
  Related excerpt #YJRC9J:
      True to the transformative potential of the limen , spaces of concealment are sites of value transformation, where our stored possessions transmogrify into heirlooms and collectibles, or alternatively through spatial rites of separation allow for divestment and eventual removal (Hirschman, Ruvio, and Belk 2012; Miller and Parrot 2009; Thompson 1979).

5. Source: Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically (#BX2YWY), Amiria Henare, Martin Holbraad, Sari Wastell, p. 57
  Context:
    #PFEZTC TAONGA MĀORI
      #FRZ4TF Encompassing rights and property in New Zealand
  Score: 0.514
  Related excerpt #MNV7E2:
      Ownership gathers things momentarily to a point by locating them in the owner, halting endless dissemination, effecting an identity.

6. Source: Materiality (#R26U48), Daniel Miller, p. 94
  Context:
    #49Y6EC MATERIALITY
      #AB85T2 A Materialist Approach to Materiality
        #ERGHBE REFERENCES
  Score: 0.514
  Related excerpt #34FEHL:
      Ownership gathers things momentarily to a point by locating them in the owner, halting endless dissemination, effecting an identity.

7. Source: Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store (#SHZ6RT), Frederik Larsen, p. 12
  Context:
    #DLSW98 Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store
      #6EZUR8 Problematic categorisations
        #WEBSG8 Return to rubbish theory, gifts and commodities
  Score: 0.485
  Related excerpt #6HZ3BY:
      Writing biographies of things, as Kopytoff suggests, offers a temporal understanding of the changing nature of objects in a social sphere. He describes how objects change category over time as a result of biographical events such as buying, giving, selling, etc. It is one of these events, or sets of events, that is the focus of this article: the remarketing of used objects. These events, the result of a number of practices that include donating, sorting and valuation, transform objects from a relatively invaluable bulk of discards into singularized commodities. Gifting and commoditisation are equally important, and as such the value of these objects is affected by both. Kopytoff suggests that an object can be an heirloom and a commodity simultaneously to different people in accordance with different value systems. 30 In the process of remarketing used objects the objects have to potentially be both to the same person, i.e. the person sorting them. As Graeber, Miller and others note, the dichotomy between gift and commodity as completely separate states is too simple. 31 In the Community Thrift the objects arrive as gifts in one sense, as they are donated to charity, but they are also potential commodities. Otherwise the Community Thrift would not accept them. They are also potential rubbish, since nobody knows if the Community Thrift can make use of the donations. If the objects were treated only as potential commodities, more things would be looked up and sold online, the prices would be higher, and

8. Source: My Life with Things: The Consumer Diaries (#Y3KME8), Elizabeth Chin, p. 50
  Context:
    #XJ352H Contents
      #6YPJY9 The Entries
        #L7F6RX A DIGRESSION ON THE TOPIC OF THE TRANSITIONAL OBJECT
  Score: 0.487
  Related excerpt #H5AB9T:
      Let me shift for a moment out of diary entry mode and into scholarly analysis mode. Reflecting on my relationship with my Banky got me thinking about the “transitional objects.” The concept of the transitional object comes from the work of British psychologist D. W. Winnicott, who describes it as “the first ‘not-me’ possession.” 1 More broadly, object theory in psychology is meant to invoke both material objects and the “object” of a child’s (or person’s) desire, but I take it as no accident that Winnicott in his essay specifically uses the word “possession.” Typically, he notes, this first “not-me” possession is a soft toy, blanket, or other object, and it is through forming a relation with this object that the child learns key elements in forming a self-concept. Part of what is so provocative about Winnicott’s notion is that he views the transitional object as intimately tied up with key processes of creativity, self-awareness, and the ability to think in complex symbolic ways, as in the example of play. Object theory stresses that no one interacts with the external world per se; rather, the material world is always experienced through a set of associations, internalized images, desires. Object theory also posits that the transitional object is central in allowing children to individuate and develop independent identity. Attachment theory draws on similar ideas and issues. To be fair, the generalized use of the notion of the “transitional object” does not limit it to a “possession.” For most theorists, the transitional object can vary; it might include body parts or even words. Moreover, people may have transitional objects at various junctures. Nevertheless, I will focus on Winnicott’s own definition of the term, which, wittingly or unwittingly, makes possession a central aspect of the transitional object.

### 35. Tool result: search_text

Exact matches

1. Source: Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? (#4UEQN8), Gretchen M. Herrmann, p. 2
  Context:
    #QF9LBR gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale?
      #FJYHT6 gift and commodity
  Matching excerpt #ZRD3NA:
      Cumulating scholarship suggests that the characterization of certain sociocultural areas as either gift or market economies has also been overdrawn. Carrier (1992b) argues that the process of "Occidentalizing" the West—that is, naturalizing and essentializing it as a market economy—has resulted in neglecting elements of gift relations there. The ostensibly market-driven West contains pockets of gift communities, such as exchange among groups of urban poor (Dow 1977; Lowenthal 1975; Stack 1974), household economies (Carrier 1992b; Corrigan 1989), offerings in the scientific community (Hyde 1983), and the exchange of presents (Cheal 1988; Davis 1972, 1992). Like the garage sale, some sites of exchange combine social and market relations, such as the selling of Tupperware at parties (e.g., Davis 1973). Even labor contributions beyond production levels set by a firm have been framed by an economist (Akerlof 1984) as partial gift exchange, in recognition of social relations of the workplace. Although artistic offerings can be viewed as gifts (Hyde 1983) in the West, Flores (1994) finds that different enactments of the drama "Los Pastores" can act as gifts or commodities according to the social relations surrounding their presentations.

2. Source: Incidental sustainability? Notes from a thrift store in Germany (#4Y4DVC), Petra Kuppinger, p. 5
  Context:
    #AYGQVA Incidental sustainability? Notes from a thrift store in Germany
      #9V9QRZ Incidental sustainability?
  Matching excerpt #YQUEUY:
      To understand the power of individual practices, small projects, and group efforts, it is paramount to transcend discourses that insist on exclusive definitions of economic activities and that situate relevant activities in hierarchically ordered sites of production and exchange. Current debates about ‘degrowth, sustainable development, steady-state economy, postcapitalism, alternative economies, diverse economies, green economies, ecological modernization, and solidarity economy’ (Schmid, 2019b: 2) challenge this limited/limiting view of (worthwhile) economic activities and outline different ways of conceptualizing practices that support meaningful lives and foster social and ecological transformations (Hickel, 2020; Schmid, 2020).

3. Source: Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage (#7BM5AQ), Sasha Newell, p. 2
  Context:
    #29MY8X Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage
      #23FBJ8 KEYWORDS
  Matching excerpt #FUWPNP:
      Storage works as a kind of contained non-space, a world apart, allowing the contradictory desires to keep and jettison to coexist. Every home has some form of storage (at least shoeboxes under the bed), and most set aside vast reserves of such private space, sometimes equal to the inhabitable square footage of the home, space never meant to be seen by guests and much of it outside the purview of the inhabitants' daily patterns of movement in the home. As such it becomes an invisible ghostly double to the home, a space of liminal misrule. It is the spatial nature of storage as liminality that makes Foucault's heterotopia useful here, the idea of built spaces that are conceived of in opposition to normal social space, as a form of the outside that has been condoned off and protected. Of great importance is that Foucault refrains from attaching a valence of evaluation to the heterotopia – it has the potential to be pure or polluted, deviant or divine – it is defined primarily by being set apart. Within the world of the home, public spaces come to represent the social skin of the family, playing a role equivalent to clothing in Terry Turner's analysis, such that the interior walls become the exterior of the self, and this social space has actually expanded in contemporary architecture to include the kitchen as a primary site of ostentation. Even the bedrooms remain sites of self-expression, albeit for more intimate guests. It is storage space (almost never revealed to guests) that objectifies the hidden inner life of the person, including, in boxes that often go years unopened, reserves concealed from self-awareness.

4. Source: The (im)possibilities of circular consumption: Producing and performing circular clothing consumption in retail and household settings (#8EVNK8), Réka Tölg, p. 45
  Context:
    #T6KQ92 Introduction
      #BDRQSR A practice theories approach to producing and performing circular consumption
        #WVG4WA Defining market practices
          #TZDV85 Producing consumption on retail markets
  Matching excerpt #JAB46F:
      Importantly for this dissertation, the market studies scholarship recognises that consumers are more than just made-up 'choosers' in a specific exchange situation. Previous studies within this research tradition show that consumption is also socially shaped by entities from outside retail market settings. As Callon et al. (2002) argue, consumers' lives expand outside the retail stores; their choices are collectively negotiated and made also through their households. Franck Cochoy's ethnographic work in supermarkets on the making of consumption choices (Cochoy, 2004, 2008) sheds further light on this process. While the socio-material set up and 'market things' (Cochoy, 2007) of the retail settings, such as shelves, packaging or even shopping carts—and now digital entities (Cochoy et al., 2017; Fuentes and Svängstedt, 2017)—work towards enabling exchange, the choices configured in retail settings are embedded in and complicated by everyday lives and social relations.

5. Source: The Cultural Biography of Things (#9DHD6K), Igor Kopytoff, p. 10
  Context:
    #56DXR4 The social life of things
      #N9EU24 Complex societies
        #CFM2PD The dynamics of informal singularization in complex societies
  Matching excerpt #LEXSQT:
      The only time when the commodity status of a thing is beyond question is the moment of actual exchange. Most of the time, when the commodity is effectively out of the commodity sphere, its status is inevitably ambiguous and open to the push and pull of events and desires, as it is shuffled about in the flux of social life. This is the time when it is exposed to the well-nigh-infinite variety of attempts to singularize it. Thus, singularizations of various kinds, many of them fleeting, are a constant accompaniment of commoditization, all the more so when it becomes excessive. There is a kind of singularizing black market here that is the mirror-image of, and as inevitable as, the more familiar commoditizing black market that accompanies regulated singularizing economies. Thus, even things that unambiguously carry an exchange value – formally speaking, therefore, commodities – do absorb the other kind of worth, one that is non-monetary and goes beyond exchange worth. We may take this to be the missing non-economic side of what Marx called commodity fetishism. For Marx, the worth of commodities is determined by the social relations of their production; but the existence of the exchange system makes the production process remote and misperceived, and it "masks" the commodity's true worth (as, say, in the case of diamonds). This allows the commodity to be socially endowed with a fetishlike "power" that is unrelated to its true worth. Our analysis suggests, however, that some of that power is attributed to commodities after they are produced, and this by way of an autonomous cognitive and cultural process of singularization.

6. Source: Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies (#GABXSA), Daniel Miller, p. 217
  Context:
    #4XXQU9 GEOGRAPHIES OF CONSUMPTION
      #KUMZHW INTRODUCTION
        #GCFWE3 SURVEY
          #4R36SB Sites
  Matching excerpt #JYRNJQ:
      The [rave] subculture far outstrips other forms of youth entertainment because of where it takes place. Outside the regulatory space of the home or the school, the more autonomous space of the subculture contributes directly to the weakening of these other institutional ties.

7. Source: Grey Greening: Quiet Sustainability (#MRANHJ), Pavel Mašek, p. 15
  Context:
    #FCTBY9 Grey greening: quiet sustainability at auto salvage yards
      #GR8NX9 5. Conclusion
  Matching excerpt #VMY55B:
      happening at the beginning (or maybe the other end?) of the same line: the sphere of production Argenti and Knight (2015) assert that none of the green economy promises – to heal the wounds made by the predatory consumer economy while retaining the same patterns of production and consumption – passes through the sifter of neoliberal growth-logic unchanged. The case of pandemic motors shows this quite well. While sustaining top-down environmental awareness is limited by the market-based economy, societal and individual environmental concerns are part of diverse economies that work for societies and environments (Gibson-Graham, Cameron, Healy 2013, pp. xiii–xxiii) in a much more ‘natural’ way. Market economy, in contrast to diverse economies, is not flexible, regardless of whether we call it ‘green’ or not. It is only a case of repainting steel-grey capitalism green (Howe, Boyer 2020). Human motivations are diverse, and therefore they cannot be seen only through the market-based economy perspective. If one acknowledges it, then one cannot be surprised that the expectations of lawmakers, whatever they are, are not always fulfilled.

8. Source: The Social Life of Things (#PB2Z6X), Arjun Appadurai, p. 20
  Context:
    #YP5HNF Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
      #T77LES Knowledge and commodities
  Matching excerpt #2XE33K:
      Problems involving knowledge, information, and ignorance are not restricted to the production and consumption poles of the careers of commodities, but characterize the process of circulation and exchange itself. In a powerful cultural account of the Moroccan bazaar, Clifford Geertz has placed the search for reliable information at the heart of this institution and has shown how difficult it is for actors in this system to gain reliable information either about people or about things (Geertz 1979). Much of the institutional structure and cultural form of the bazaar is double-edged, making reliable knowledge hard to get and also facilitating the search for it. It is tempting to conclude that such complex and culturally organized information mazes are a special feature of bazaar-style economies, and are absent in nonmarket, simple economies, as well as in advanced industrial ones. Yet, as Geertz himself suggests (p. 224) the bazaar as an analytical category may well apply to the used-car market (though not the new-car market) in contemporary industrial economies. We can put this point in a more general form: bazaar-style information searches are likely to characterize any exchange setting where the quality and the appropriate valuation of goods are not standardized, though the reasons for the lack of standardization, for the volatility of prices, and for the unreliable quality of specific things of a certain type may vary enormously. Indeed, systems for the exchange of kula valuables, of used cars, and of oriental rugs, though they occur in very different institutional and cultural settings, may all involve bazaar-style information economies.

Approximate matches

1. Source: Incidental sustainability? Notes from a thrift store in Germany (#4Y4DVC), Petra Kuppinger, p. 6
  Context:
    #AYGQVA Incidental sustainability? Notes from a thrift store in Germany
      #9V9QRZ Incidental sustainability?
  Score: 0.565
  Related excerpt #5UW3F9:
      presence across the globe, beyond the confines of what is defined as ‘the economy’. It is paramount to identify these ‘hidden’ activities and their spatialities.

2. Source: Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle (#59QUM6), Sally Eden, p. 8
  Context:
    #5V87AY Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle
      #R4FPWC Implosion 3: Mainstream/alternative and the sustainability and ethics of divestment
  Score: 0.635
  Related excerpt #T2GYHC:
      The 'alternative' or 'diverse' economies literature also aims to challenge 'capitalocentrism' by opening up research agendas to analyse performative practices in particular (Gibson-Graham, 2008: 623). It is therefore important not to see Freecycling as some neatly compartmentalised and idealised 'alternative' economic

3. Source: Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle (#59QUM6), Sally Eden, p. 8
  Context:
    #5V87AY Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle
      #R4FPWC Implosion 3: Mainstream/alternative and the sustainability and ethics of divestment
  Score: 0.613
  Related excerpt #KM7SLZ:
      Challenging mainstream practices and impacts is a key aim of the literatures on 'alternative' models of the economy, also termed 'diverse economies' (e.g. Gibson-Graham, 2006) or 'the solidarity economy' (Lemaître and Helmsing, 2012; Miller, 2006). These different rubrics cover a vast diversity of practices and organisations, from worker cooperatives in Brazil (Lemaître and Helmsing, 2012) to urban agriculture in Canada. These diverse projects share an emphasis on valuing labour (rather than alienating it), local grassroots developments, cooperative or self-management, a focus on community and subsistence needs and democratising decision making (Bauhardt, 2014).

4. Source: Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care (#B5KMLA), Petra Kuppinger, p. 23
  Context:
    #BTPYSB Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care
      #2LDVPH Introduction: Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care
        #UHERVL RECENT ECONOMIES OF REUSE, REPAIR, SHARING, AND CARE IN THE GLOBAL NORTH
  Score: 0.613
  Related excerpt #DLQYN3:
      They create “spaces of alternative economizing that are partially removed from capitalist valorization” and are “genuinely subversive” as they challenge the “apparent verities and certain singularities of capitalism” (Schmid 2019, 231, 247). Theorizing the proliferation of experimental social and economic projects, Graham-Gibson point to the global infrastructure of meetings, websites, and other media that describe, support, and solidify their impact ( ibid. , 614). They speak of “world-makers,” who in small groups tackle humanity’s challenges ( ibid. ). Graham-Gibson insist that invisible activities and projects are connected in their struggle for alternative futures, just economies, and planetary health. They state that non-market transactions and unpaid household and care work account for 30–50 percent of economic activities in countries across the world ( ibid. , 615). Current economies of reuse, repair, sharing, and care unfold in such contexts. Garage sales, repair shops, swapping events, and repurposing activities are “spaces of difference” ( ibid. ) where patterns of labor, valuation, exchange, and sociality differ from capitalist markets and seek to “contribute to social well-being worldwide” (Graham-Gibson 2008, 615). This global care/alternative economy illustrates “the possibility of new economic becomings, rather than a condition of their impossibility” ( ibid. , 619).

5. Source: Saving the city: Collective low-budget organising and urban practice (#QUD55H), Birke Otto, Hans Vollmer, Heike Derwanz, Paula Bialski, p. 10
  Context:
    #86XLHF 'Saving' the city: Collective low-budget organising and urban practice
      #ELSHB5 Forms of commoning, frugality and DIY as degrowth practices
  Score: 0.586
  Related excerpt #DWXUQE:
      Urban collectives like the New Cross Commoners in London exemplify that in an urban setting which is being put under an 'austerity regime' and/or being gentrified, practices are at play that are different from capitalistic production – questioning private ownership and other fundamental concepts like working for a wage, competition and the market (Exner and Kratzwald, 2012: 24). However Harvey, in regard to Ostrom, reminds us that horizontal organisation finds its limits when solidarity groups leave the small scale (Harvey, 2012: 70).

6. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 1
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #4F5EEN 2. Situating provisioning
        #PFRB5B 2.1. Diverse economies, morality and gifting
  Score: 0.622
  Related excerpt #H4KC23:
      Nearly 10 years ago Gibson-Graham (2008: 614) argued that 'projects of economic autonomy and experimentation' were 'proliferating worldwide'. These 'diverse economies' offered an opportunity for geographers to bring 'marginalised, hidden and alternative economies to

7. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 0
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #NMW2HP 1. Introduction
  Score: 0.614
  Related excerpt #C3C284:
      Gibson-Graham's 'diverse economies' is a useful mechanism with which to think through contemporary alternative responses to global economic and political uncertainty. Models such as food banks, community food gardens, pay-what-you-can cafes and tool libraries, to name but a few, have been positioned as potential resolutions to the

8. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 1
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #4F5EEN 2. Situating provisioning
        #PFRB5B 2.1. Diverse economies, morality and gifting
  Score: 0.594
  Related excerpt #7DF3FD:
      light' (p. 613). Building upon their prior concept of 'community economies' (2006), Gibson's-Graham's 'diverse economies' involves an expansive variety of global-local forms of alternative and non-market transactions, paid and unpaid forms of labour, and alternative capitalist and non-capitalist types of enterprises. Drawing on feminist economies, but also notions of the social economy, this broad brush approach captured the heterogeneity and experimental aura of the then economic climate. It also circumvented the ongoing fierce debates about what is 'alternative' within the economy. Through a focus on relationality and embeddedness, their work conceives alternatives as 'continuously made (and unmade) through economic performance', as opposed to thinking about them as somehow 'out-there', pre-given constructs of an 'other' (Jones, 2010: 7).

### 36. Tool result: search_text

Exact matches

1. Source: On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair & Care (#CUWPC9), Cindy Isenhour, Joshua Reno, p. 0
  Context:
    #3YJ9P3 On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair &amp; Care
  Matching excerpt #655E43:
      Keywords: reuse; second-hand; circular economy; waste; salvage

2. Source: Freecycling Markets as Sustainable Materialist Movements? Closing Reuse Circularity Loops in Singapore (#FHZZ6U), Brenda S.A. Yeoh, Qian Hui Tan, p. 3
  Context:
    #MLNREG 3. LITERATURE REVIEW: R-BEHAVIOURS, SUSTAINABLE MATERIALISM, CIRCULAR ACTIVISMS
      #8K73BS 3.1 CIRCULAR R-BEHAVIOURS
  Matching excerpt #QGPQ9V:
      Recirculation, which is at the core of circular practices, has not been directly mentioned in discussions on R-behaviours. Rather, it is featured obliquely in resell/reuse (R2 in Reike et al's typology), with reselling as a means of returning a product to the market economy (without much adaptation) for reuse. Besides reselling, academics highlight a slew of material divestment networks for individuals to find 'relief from the burden of possession' (Roux and Guiot 2020: 398; Ong et al. 2020). These networks can be classified into (a) a gift economy (e.g. donations to charity, free-cycling, freeganing without a monetary transaction); and (b) a second-hand 'waste-based commodity frontier' (Pyyhtinen and Lehtonen 2022) involving the resale of things (e.g. deals with junk traders, flea markets, garage/car-bootsales, thrift/second-hand stores). Such divestment circuits are not mutually exclusive, as things may be sold at throwaway prices and a pure market logic may not always undergird monetary exchanges (Herrmann 1997).

3. Source: Growing in Motion: The Circulation of Used Things on Second-hand Markets (#MBXQXR), Anna Bohlin, Staffan Appelgren, p. 13
  Context:
    #3U9XEW Growing in Motion: The Circulation of Used Things on Second-hand Markets1
      #4GET4T Gifts, Commodities and the Hybrid Second-hand Thing
  Matching excerpt #CF9S3S:
      of Matsutake mushrooms, she shows how social relations, including non-human social relations, form a crucial part in creating this particular form of exclusive mushrooms as a commodity. Significantly, however, these aspects are subsequently ‘forgotten’ in sorting and assessment work ‘designed to block gift-like social relations’ (ibid.). This is of interest in the context of how second-hand objects achieve their social and commercial meaningfulness, a process which is similar to those outlined by Tsing, and Geertz in his example of the bazaar economy. The difference, however, lies in how the value of second-hand objects is dependent on procedures of remembering, rather than of techniques of forgetting, something we will explore below.

4. Source: Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store (#SHZ6RT), Frederik Larsen, p. 0
  Context:
    #DLSW98 Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store
      #NJEST3 KEYWORDS
  Matching excerpt #TEN8X8:
      Second-hand; thrift; valuation practices; material culture; ethnography; economic anthropology; commodities; Mary Douglas; charity; exchange; value; markets

5. Source: ‘It will Keep Circulating’: Loving and Letting Go of Things in Swedish Second-hand Markets (#ZJUEY4), Anna Bohlin, p. 0
  Context:
    #SSAEUN 'It will Keep Circulating': Loving and Letting Go of Things in Swedish Second-hand Markets
  Matching excerpt #R3D4QX:
      Using the case of Sweden, this article examines the growing sector of reuse and second-hand activities from the perspective of how people express and practice their relationships to objects that they acquire from second-hand markets. Drawing on anthropological fieldwork in flea markets, second-hand shops, homes and recycling depots, it explores how people relate to and handle goods which, instead of becoming waste, enter new life cycles through reuse. It suggests that buying, using and passing on certain kinds of second-hand things involves particular forms of affection and 'serial' care for the objects as things-in-motion. At the same time, part of the attraction of these objects is how they enable the practising of a particular kind of subjectivity: that of an informed, moral and caring consumer. Part of such reuse subjectivity is the capacity to form close bonds with, and care for objects, but also to untie these bonds in order to carefully and responsibly let go of them. The article suggests that paying attention to the affective orientation and disposition that form part of such consumer subjectivity may provide keys to understanding what drives second-hand consumption and the accelerated circulation of goods it may entail. Offering an opportunity to examine assumptions of reuse and circulation as inherently 'sustainable', it also provides perspectives on practices of care.

Approximate matches

1. Source: “Still good life”: On the value of reuse and distributive labor in “depleted” rural Maine (#3F4AVR), Brieanne Berry, Cindy Isenhour, p. 4
  Context:
    #XM8XYE “Still good life”: On the value of reuse and distributive labor in “depleted” rural Maine
      #HZNXSR Background and literature review: Meaning, motive, and value in reuse
  Score: 0.691
  Related excerpt #Y6FYZT:
      Secondhand goods are fluid and ontologically unstable objects in motion (Bennett 2010; Bohlin 2019) that can be adapted to multiple contexts and valued differently in each. Ethnographic studies suggest that many of those who salvage discarded objects are engaging in a “deliberative project of value transformation” (Crocker and Chivervalls 2018, 5) not only as a means for income generation but, often more importantly, as a strategy to build alternative social and economic structures that contribute to individual and community well-being (Albinsson and Perera 2012).

2. Source: Household Recycling and Consumption Work (#4LST57), Kathryn Wheeler, Miriam Glucksmann, p. 28
  Context:
    #3BMVZP Picking a Way through Rubbish
      #3AX9RU Changing practices of reuse and recycling
  Score: 0.684
  Related excerpt #S5UQYZ:
      economy with respect to charity shops and informal ways of trading in car boot sales. These are usually based on principles of exchange normally absent from first-hand purchase and sale, including negotiations over the utility and transformation of goods.

3. Source: Household Recycling and Consumption Work (#4LST57), Kathryn Wheeler, Miriam Glucksmann, p. 208
  Context:
    #E4VADY Varieties of Recycling Work
  Score: 0.669
  Related excerpt #6VEFZM:
      the taken-for-granted underpinnings of long-standing systems of waste management. We then turn to the question of value, reflecting upon the ways that consumers in Sweden and England are encouraged to value the practice of recycling in moral ways, rather than as a source of personal income as in pre-industrial societies and areas of the global South. By using the case of educational resources developed to formally inculcate children into moral economies of recycling, we reveal how practical and normative instructions promote the successful accomplishment of recycling consumption work tasks, thus demonstrating the co-constitution of morals and markets. Finally, we summarise how the 'socio-economic formations of labour' (SEFL) framework has enabled us to explore the significance of the work performed by a variety of actors within distinctive economies of recycling. We consider the wider applicability of the SEFL framework and its potential to be taken forward into fields beyond waste to inform future studies of work and employment in society.

4. Source: Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle (#59QUM6), Sally Eden, p. 10
  Context:
    #5V87AY Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle
      #R4FPWC Implosion 3: Mainstream/alternative and the sustainability and ethics of divestment
  Score: 0.682
  Related excerpt #Z7QD9W:
      Items on Freecycle are thus plastic, being reimagined through circulating consumption, shifting across moral registers from 'wanted' to 'unwanted', from 'bad' to 'good' and back again as diverse consumers purchase, handle, pass on and repair them. This 'moral economy' (Sayer, 2003) is also a circular economy; it enables repair and re-valuation where the worth of goods can be increased by looping through different practices, rather than a linear economy based on entropy where worth can only decline as goods move towards disposal. It also performs moral reordering as part of this circularity.

5. Source: Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care (#B5KMLA), Petra Kuppinger, p. 20
  Context:
    #BTPYSB Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care
      #2LDVPH Introduction: Second-Hand Cultures and Economies of Reuse, Repair, Sharing, and Care
        #UHERVL RECENT ECONOMIES OF REUSE, REPAIR, SHARING, AND CARE IN THE GLOBAL NORTH
  Score: 0.668
  Related excerpt #ZTNHPL:
      Starting in the 1990s Nicky Gregson and Louise Crewe conducted groundbreaking research on second-hand economies in the UK. When most analysts focused on work and value in the formal capitalist economy, Gregson and Crewe studied economic exchanges and social interactions at car-boot sales and other venues and highlighted the economic, social, and cultural contributions of marginal second-hand economies (1998). They insisted, “that second-hand worlds matter” (2003, 1) and identified second-hand markets as sites of “resistant consumer practices” (1998, 39) that employ different rules (haggling for prices), pricing mechanisms, and value systems. These markets are embedded in complex fields of “finding, fixing, bartering, trading, and gifting and selling” and create value in unexpected spaces (Isenhour and Berry 2020, 298) that offer mundane economic transactions and “fun and sociality” (Gregson and Crewe 2003, 41) for sellers, buyers, and visitors (Herrmann 2006; Murphy 2017). “People go to thrift stores for pleasure” (Machado et al. 2019, 391) and many second-hand venues are meeting places where “peer-to-peer collaborative consumption fosters community” (Albinsson and Yasantha Perera 2012, 305). Machado et al. argue that the more people go to streets fairs and similar events, the stronger their relationships become with people “in these circuits and the stronger their feelings of rejection for the traditional production chain” (2019, 303). This results in “financial benefits and critical behavior” ( ibid. ). Benedikt Schmid (2019) speaks of the “communality” of shared repairs spaces that offer cooperation and inclusion.

6. Source: On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair & Care (#CUWPC9), Cindy Isenhour, Joshua Reno, p. 3
  Context:
    #3YJ9P3 On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair &amp; Care
      #GKP2HM Themes and Theory: Reuse as Revaluation, Resistance, Care, Relations and Reproduction
        #AXJTJC Reproduction: Reuse on the margins &amp; commodification at the 'end of cheap nature'
  Score: 0.682
  Related excerpt #8E8GLD:
      Despite the creative labor invested in the resurrection of value, it is also true that those who work with discards are often stigmatized for working with materials considered to be dangerous or dirty, rather than celebrated for their labor creating and redistributing value (Erikson and Schober 2017). Contemporary economic logics, mirroring linear production-consumption-disposal systems, assign primary value to productive processes which are seen as the genesis of value (Isenhour et al., 2017). These logics simultaneously neglect consideration of value generated in other locations, including distribution and disposal. James Ferguson (2015) has recently argued that this economic logic proceeds even as a growing number of people are excluded from wage labor. Indeed, even as economies of abandonment (Povinelli, 2011) broaden, production and wage labor continue to be imagined as the source of productive value even as distributive work, like that involved in reuse and second-hand economies, takes on a 'new centrality' and makes up an increasingly large segment of economic activity (Ferguson 2015: 19). Ethnographic engagements with the economy, however, have long provided insight into the value of distributive labor, which we understand is just as much about the movement as resources as it is the construction of moral (Scott, 1976), human (Hart et al., 2010) or peopled (Gudeman and Lövving, 2005) economies.

7. Source: Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store (#SHZ6RT), Frederik Larsen, p. 13
  Context:
    #DLSW98 Valuation in action: Ethnography of an American thrift store
      #6EZUR8 Problematic categorisations
        #WEBSG8 Return to rubbish theory, gifts and commodities
  Score: 0.675
  Related excerpt #EPD7E8:
      many of the cheaper objects would be discarded. In fact, as Armun described to me, the Community Thrift would most likely cease to exist in this case, since they would generate more money from the sale of the warehouse than they would from many years of operating. In other words, commodification of the entire operation could, potentially make more economic sense. An entirely economic analysis would likely find several instances of inefficiency in the operation, but looking at the elements of a gift exchange these practices make sense as part of the aim of the Community Thrift. As Cliff expressed it: 'we could do the eBay thing to make more money, but that kinda defes the purpose of a thrift store'. Gift exchange is not only carried out by donors, it pervades the whole organisation: from sorters 'giving' their time to bundle non-valuable objects to pricing structures that are sensitive to the economic circumstances of some of their customers, to the employees allowing patrons to nap or hang out in the furniture department, and to the overall aim of the organisation to generate money to the various charities they partner with. The gift givers, that is the donors, are also caught up in this duality: they are not necessarily driven by altruism alone, since, for example, they can get a tax refund from making the donation. In some cases, donating unwanted items may even provide absolution from indulging in overconsumption. But focusing on the practices involved and how employees and donors invest actions and concern in them makes it possible to consider both economic market-driven structures and social and emotional influences as well. Considering only the social aspects of the exchange of donations also creates a simplified image of the reality of second-hand markets. Graeber offers an inclusive concept of value that can grasp both market and gift relations, by suggesting that value, in the broader sociological sense as well as economic, is constituted by the actions, thought and energy invested in an object. 32 In the context of the thrift store the actions invested in something, be it in the value of an object or an organisation, is a potentiality in that relation until it is capitalised. Capitalising or making something exchangeable in the form of an abstracted medium of equivalence releases that potential and renders the relation stale. But in the Community Thrift the capitalisation of (some of the) value generates social value in other areas. It is clear that thrift is the dominant value in the Community Thrift and making the most of the donations transcends all aspects of valuation practices. Seen as an expression of thrift, the negotiations between economic and social and emotional values create coherent patterns of value.

8. Source: New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning (#XATD2A), Helen Holmes, p. 1
  Context:
    #AHCZ2X New spaces, ordinary practices: Circulating and sharing within diverse economies of provisioning
      #4F5EEN 2. Situating provisioning
        #PFRB5B 2.1. Diverse economies, morality and gifting
  Score: 0.667
  Related excerpt #5AR63H:
      Inherent within alternative and diverse economies is the notion of morality. As Sayer (2015: 292) notes 'all economies are moral economies in some respects', as they must all justify themselves and their actions. This reading complements the notion that these new economic spaces are not simply alterities to capitalism, as the two cannot be easily detached (Daya and Authar, 2012), but rather they are 'counter to the mono-culture of capitalism' (Gibson-Graham, 2008: 623). There is not the space in this paper to adequately engage with the extensive and often complex debates regarding the moral economy (see: Polanyi, 1957; Sayer 2000, 2003; Thompson, 1991). Rather it is only suffice to say, that the concept of the moral economy, as both an object of study and as a method of enquiry, is deployed typically (although by no means exclusively) by the alternative economies literature as a means of appreciating: the ethics of care; importance of human agency; reciprocal relations; and collective and community action inherent in some economic activities. Closely entwined with the moral economy, and equally as contested, is that of the gift economy, and likewise this is not something this paper will focus on. Volunteering, donations of time, money, materials are all forms of gifts which are regularly given to provisioning organisations – emergency or otherwise. As Caplan (2016) notes, the donation of food to a food bank or the volunteers' time are both gifts. Yet, despite the prominence of morality and gifting as inherent features of provisioning, and undoubtedly features which are also 'made material', it is the practices of sharing and circularity which are at the core of this article.

### 37. Assistant

# A lucid walkthrough of Chapter 4

Here's what the chapter is doing, section by section, with the through-line called out.

**Frame (#PL9BXR–#L252MY).** Brīvbode as a freecycling practice — material site, meanings, competencies — analysed as both *practice-entity* and *performance*. The chapter follows things on their journey through the shop, and the central claim is that what holds Brīvbode together as a site is not a single definition but a moral economy that lets *incompatible orientations coexist*.

**§4.1 Incoming Flow.** Freecycling starts in the household. Divestment is donor-driven, batched around life events (moving, deceased relatives), and shaped by an *imagined receiver* (Aiga's homeless person). The act of bringing things to Brīvbode performs moral work that throwing away does not — it relieves guilt and transfers responsibility. But unpredictability is intrinsic: the same logic that lets people responsibly route surplus also lets Brīvbode become a pressure valve for fast fashion. *Tension introduced: alternative caring system vs low-threshold overflow channel.*

**§4.2 The Site as Active Flow.** Material elements: physicality matters (vs digital), permanence enables regular rhythm, the DIY-retail aesthetic is contested between volunteers, the site depends on broader infrastructure (textile containers absorb 30%). Overflow is a constant felt experience. The pull of Brīvbode persists even when the site closes. *Argument: physical co-presence and stable infrastructure are constitutive — without them this isn't a practice, it's an event.*

**§4.3 Reading the Room: Norms and Competencies.** Gendered material composition (mostly women's and children's clothing); gendered evaluation standards (men's clothes held to lower thresholds); rules-as-relational rather than formal; food/medicine as boundary cases revealing how norms are negotiated socially rather than codified. Then the competencies cluster — material literacy, knowing when to come, the negative competency of *not* taking. *Argument: the practice runs on social and evaluative competencies that are unevenly distributed and learned through participation.*

**§4.4 Not a Charity: The Moral Economy.** Organizers actively maintain freecycling-as-exchange against the gravitational pull of charity. Widlok's give boxes as comparison: the physical site mediates so people can take without performing need. But the imperative to keep things flowing produces *pragmatic accommodation* — resellers are tolerated as "forest sanitarians" because the deeper logic of circulation outweighs the rule against monetary onward sale. *Key claim: a hierarchy of meanings — circulation trumps the no-money rule.*

**§4.5 Letting Go: Attachment Without Price.** The non-monetary regime recalibrates attachment — Rasa's "no longer have that heaviness around a thing." Trial-and-return loosens commitment further. But the same conditions that make divestment easy can make acquisition more frequent, so participants supply their own brake (Madara, Marta). Then biographical-rupture material: Aiga's travel, war anxiety, Māra's explicit work on attachment. *Argument: Brīvbode is infrastructure for a personal practice of detachment.*

**§4.6 Plural Meanings of Acquisition.** Not one meaning but a cluster — dignity (Marija), aesthetic autonomy (Anna), low-stakes experiment (Elīna, the cross-dresser), craft materials (Madara), with stigma and "energy of previous owners" as countervailing meanings, and generational normalisation underway. *Argument: heterogeneity of meanings is what allows the practice to recruit a socially diverse public.*

**§4.7 Quiet or Reflected Sustainability?** Some practitioners (Viesturs, Rasa) have moved beyond meaning-work — Smith & Jehlička's *quiet sustainability*. Others (Luīze) frame it explicitly. Both registers coexist; the thesis holds them without collapsing them. *Argument: sustainability can be an outcome without being a requirement.*

**§4.8 Conclusion.** Brīvbode is sustained by plural, sometimes incompatible meanings, held together by the moral economy of exchange. The tension between alternative-infrastructure and overflow-valve is the chapter's central finding: not a problem to be resolved but a description of how sustainable practices are embedded in contemporary life.

**Through-line in one sentence:** Chapter 4 argues that Brīvbode functions because it is loose enough to hold contradictions — donor-driven divestment alongside taker-driven acquisition; alternative regime alongside overflow channel; quiet sustainability alongside articulated environmentalism — and that the moral economy of exchange is the connective tissue.

---

# Juicy citations for "purgatory" and the autonomous-zone register

The two themes you named are sitting closer together in the literature than you might think — Brīvbode-as-threshold-space *is* a "diverse economies" claim once you frame it that way. Here's where the gold is.

## On the purgatory / threshold / liminality theme

**Newell, "Uncontained accumulation: Hidden heterotopias of storage and spillage" (#7BM5AQ).** This one is almost custom-made for §4.4. Newell uses Foucault's heterotopia to describe storage spaces as "contained non-space, a world apart, allowing the contradictory desires to keep and jettison to coexist" (#FUWPNP), and explicitly names them as **liminal sites of value transformation** "where our stored possessions transmogrify into heirlooms and collectibles, or alternatively through spatial rites of separation allow for divestment and eventual removal" (#YJRC9J). Brīvbode is exactly this kind of heterotopia — a space set apart from the home and from the market, where things await transformation. Viesturs's "purgatory for things" line (#Z4WUR2) becomes an empirical instance of Newell's theoretical claim. This is high-leverage.

**Bohlin & Appelgren, "Growing in Motion" (#MBXQXR).** Second-hand objects as a *hybrid category*, "combining elements of both the commodity form and the gift form," dependent on "energies of social remembering and disclosure" rather than the forgetting that pure commodities require (#MW6Z9B). Useful in §4.6 around the "energy of previous owners" trope (#Z4WUR2) and Madara's craftsperson's gaze (#D4H3PB).

**Bohlin, "'It will Keep Circulating': Loving and Letting Go" (#ZJUEY4).** Direct match for §4.5. Reuse subjectivity = capacity to form bonds *and* untie them. "Serial care" for things-in-motion. This deserves a real citation in the letting-go section if it doesn't have one already.

**Kopytoff, "The Cultural Biography of Things" (#9DHD6K).** The classic move you can use as a foundation. When a commodity is "out of the commodity sphere, its status is inevitably ambiguous and open to the push and pull of events and desires" (#LEXSQT). Brīvbode is the institutional expression of that ambiguity — a site engineered to keep things in the singularizing zone.

**Gille, *From the Cult of Waste* (#BJ6B3C).** Waste as a *concept out of order*, liminal in Turner's and Van Gennep's senses (#BXW2K7). Gille argues liminality is the *beginning* of analysis, not the end — moral discourses always play a role in what gets to count as waste vs. resource. Useful for §4.3 (food and medicine as boundary cases) and §4.1 (what counts as acceptable to bring).

**Larsen, "Valuation in action" (#SHZ6RT).** Things in the thrift store as simultaneously potential commodity, gift, and rubbish (#6HZ3BY, #EPD7E8). His phrasing — "many of the cheaper objects would be discarded" if they tried to commodify the operation, but the thrift store deliberately doesn't — gives you another way to articulate the §4.4 hierarchy where circulation outranks the no-money rule.

## On the autonomous zone / outside-supply-chains register

**Hobson, "Closing the loop or squaring the circle" (#8ZKAT7).** Yes, this is the recently imported one. The concept she introduces is **generative spaces** — sites of "diverse CE practices" that hold *productive potential* for circular economy debates without being absorbed into industrial systems thinking. Brīvbode is empirically exactly what Hobson is theorizing. Cite this in the chapter frame (#PL9BXR–#L252MY) or the conclusion (#A3X9XX) — it gives you the language to claim the chapter as a contribution to CE scholarship rather than just an ethnographic case.

**Holmes, "New spaces, ordinary practices" (#XATD2A).** You already cite Holmes in your introduction (#XKELL5 quotes "somehow familiar, yet new ways"). The diverse-economies framing is right there in her clothes-swap case study — clothing in "a grey space of neither waste nor want" (#8BFNRS), explicitly calling on the generative-space concept from Hobson. This bridges the two themes for you.

**Eden, "Blurring the boundaries: Prosumption, circularity and online sustainable consumption through Freecycle" (#59QUM6).** Critical caveat against the temptation to treat Brīvbode as a clean alterity: "It is therefore important not to see Freecycling as some neatly compartmentalised and idealised 'alternative' economic [space]" (#T2GYHC). She pulls "mainstream retailing and consuming vocabularies" *into* a "supposedly alternative, ethically and environmentally driven space" (#AXJJ7T). This is the perfect citation for the resellers-as-forest-sanitarians moment in §4.4 and for the chapter's broader claim that incompatible orientations coexist.

**Kuppinger, *Second-Hand Cultures* (#B5KMLA).** Frames second-hand venues as "spaces of difference" in Gibson-Graham's sense (#DLQYN3) — partially removed from capitalist valorisation. Useful as a synthesizing citation in §4.4 or the conclusion.

**Berry & Isenhour, "'Still good life'" (#3F4AVR).** Reuse as "deliberative project of value transformation" oriented to "alternative social and economic structures" (#Y6FYZT). Their framing of secondhand objects as "fluid and ontologically unstable objects in motion" complements Bohlin & Appelgren and could deepen §4.5.

**Isenhour & Reno, "On Materiality and Meaning" (#CUWPC9).** Reuse as "potentially radical alternative" to mainstream consumer culture, but **embedded within structures of capitalist accumulation and abandonment** (#LZDQ9D). This is the dialectical move you're already making in your conclusion (alternative regime *and* overflow channel). They give it explicit theoretical weight.

---

## Where to drop things

If I had to pick the four highest-leverage additions:

1. **Newell's heterotopia** → §4.4 around the purgatory line, or earlier as a frame for the whole chapter.
2. **Hobson 2016 generative spaces** → chapter frame and/or conclusion, to position Brīvbode as the empirical case of a concept CE scholarship needs.
3. **Eden's "implosion" and refusal to idealize** → §4.4 around resellers, or §4.7 around the quiet/articulated sustainability tension.
4. **Bohlin 2019 "It will keep circulating"** → §4.5 attachment-without-price, where it's almost a missing reference.

The thread that ties everything together: Brīvbode is **a heterotopia inside a diverse economy that is also a generative space for circular consumption**. That's three different literatures saying the same thing about your site, and once they're cited together the chapter's analytical contribution becomes a lot more legible.

### 38. User

let's look at our overall thesis introduction and conclusion and think about the overall thrusts and claims etc

### 39. Assistant tool calls

#### Tool call: `read`

```json
{
  "blocks": [
    "M9WQLY"
  ],
  "expand": true
}
```

### 40. Tool result: read

THESIS #4V8VH7
Practices of Divestment, Acquisition and Circulation of Things in a Swapshop in Riga, Latvia

SECTION #M9WQLY CONCLUSION

PARAGRAPH #JE7FK2
  This thesis is an ethnographic study of a swapshop to investigate how these spaces foster alternative consumption practices that possibly sustain alternative logics of value and ownership. This thesis is a contribution to the studies of circular consumption using ethnographic methods with practice theory approach.

PARAGRAPH #U2PZ9C
  Brīvbode operates within the conditions of overproduction, where the circulation of goods is shaped as much by excess as by need. While it enables reuse and access, it also absorbs the material overflow generated elsewhere. The labor of managing excess – the sorting, the deciding, the transporting, the emotional work of letting go – falls unevenly on people, is often invisible, and that becomes especially evident in circular economy contexts where more participation is needed. While some consumption work is alleviated in Brīvbode, it is replaced by other types.

PARAGRAPH #FE5BCM
  Participation in Brīvbode is a form of consumption work, and understanding it as such reveals both what the swapshop enables and what it demands. Consumption work in the context of the swapshop: the effort of finding, sorting, or repurposing items, as well as the broader social practices around bringing and taking items from Brīvbode – decluttering, home organising, dealing with the needs of family members.

PARAGRAPH #GUXEZX
  While alternative, they simultaneously overlap with some of the meanings present in capitalist consumption –... Brīvbode is at once an answer to a household problem and an arena where people work out possibly alternative relations to things.

PARAGRAPH #JM9L6Y
  improvised solution that does not presuppose a lot of resources… except sufficiency lifestyle?

PARAGRAPH #NNZ5SG
  THE TENSION BETWEEN HABIT (practice) AND INTENTION (trying to change?) Is practice unreflexive? Also work can be unreflexive… People are reflecting all the time, but what keeps them in the practice? The stickiness of it…

PARAGRAPH #PEFVAC
  Results, relevance, contribution

PARAGRAPH #HMDEDU
  Brīvbode's moral economy is negotiated, situational practice where the meaning of "right circulation" is worked out in real time rather than determined in advance.

PARAGRAPH #9DTFUU
  Further research might –– move into constitution of need… (Shove and Rinkinen) In line with Warde (2005). Circular consumption is one thing, but does it matter how you get things if it’s still an overflow?

### 41. Assistant

# The shape of the thesis as a whole

I just re-read the intro and conclusion. The good news first: **the argument the thesis is making is coherent, interesting, and original.** You can see it clearly when you put Ch4 and Ch5 next to each other. The less-good news: the introduction does most of its job but underplays the punchline, and the conclusion is still mostly notes.

Let me lay out what I see.

## The argument the thesis is actually making

When you read it through, the thesis is doing something more specific than the introduction currently signals. It is making a **two-part claim** that arrives via the two empirical chapters:

**Claim 1 (Ch4).** Brīvbode functions as a circular-consumption site precisely because it is *loose* — it holds together incompatible orientations (alternative regime and overflow valve; charity and exchange; quiet and articulated sustainability; circulation and reselling). The moral economy of exchange is the connective tissue, not a settled definition. This is a contribution to practice theory: the practice-entity is held together not by element-coherence but by tolerance for contradiction.

**Claim 2 (Ch5).** The labour that sustains this circulation is gendered, ethically motivated, absorbed into household routines, and dependent on sufficiency-oriented lives. It is invisible to circular economy policy because it is performed as care. Recognising it as both consumption work *and* care work is the first step toward policy that does not depend on its invisibility.

**The two together** make a single contribution that you could state in one sentence: *the absence of price in non-monetary circulation does not produce frictionless flow but a particular kind of moral economy and a particular distribution of invisible care-labour, and circular economy scholarship needs to see both.*

That's a genuinely good thesis. It is empirically rich, theoretically integrated, and it speaks back to a literature with real stakes. You're closer to done than the conclusion suggests.

## What the introduction does well

- Sets up overproduction, EU policy, Latvian textile collection — establishes stakes.
- Names the two analytical frameworks (practice theory + consumption work) cleanly.
- Lands the two research questions explicitly.
- The "non-monetary, non-domestic, semi-public" framing of Brīvbode is the right one and is well done.
- The Holmes "familiar yet new" framing is doing nice work.
- The note on terms is clarifying and necessary.

## What the introduction underplays

Right now the intro reads as "here is a site, here are some frameworks, here are the questions." It doesn't quite signal that the thesis will make a *finding*. A few specific gaps:

**The central thesis claim is not previewed.** The reader doesn't yet know that you'll argue Brīvbode's coherence depends on holding incompatible orientations, or that the labour sustaining it depends on its invisibility. One paragraph near the end of the intro saying "I argue that…" — even just the two sentences I wrote above — would orient the reader for everything that follows. This is one of those cases where promising the argument up front lets the chapters do their work without seeming to wander.

**The diverse-economies / generative-spaces framing is missing.** From our last conversation: Hobson's generative spaces, Holmes's diverse economies, Newell's heterotopia, and Eden's "implosion" of mainstream/alternative are all the conceptual furniture this thesis sits on, and they belong in the intro alongside practice theory and consumption work. Currently the intro frames the contribution as primarily empirical-Latvian — it could also be framed as conceptual.

**The Latvian context section (#LAR465) has unfinished material** — the bracketed placeholders (#7LMSFU, #JNSARN, #N6UNLT) need to be either resolved or cut. This is where the most concrete remaining work lives in the intro.

**The introduction is missing care-work as a register.** Ch5 was reorganised around consumption work *and* care work as two complementary registers. The intro still names only consumption work. A sentence acknowledging the care-work register would set up Ch5 properly.

## What the conclusion needs

Honestly, the conclusion (#M9WQLY) is mostly placeholder fragments right now — you know this. But the seeds are *already there*:

- #U2PZ9C — the overflow + uneven labour point. Strong.
- #FE5BCM — Brīvbode as consumption work. Good but truncated.
- #GUXEZX — alternative-and-capitalist meanings overlapping. The crucial point.
- #HMDEDU — "right circulation worked out in real time" — this is the moral-economy claim.
- #9DTFUU — Shove and Rinkinen on the constitution of need; Warde 2005. Good future-direction seeds.

What the conclusion needs to do, in order:

1. **Restate the empirical case briefly** — Brīvbode as the kind of site Hobson et al. (2021) called for studying.
2. **Synthesize the Ch4 finding** — moral economy holds incompatible orientations; the alternative-and-overflow tension is the practice's central characteristic, not a problem to fix.
3. **Synthesize the Ch5 finding** — the labour is care-work and consumption-work simultaneously, gendered, dependent on sufficiency lives, invisible to policy.
4. **Name the integrated contribution** — what does Brīvbode reveal that household-only or institution-only studies of circularity cannot? Answer: that non-monetary circulation requires both a moral-economic infrastructure of tolerance *and* a labour infrastructure of invisible care, and that these depend on each other.
5. **Speak back to circular economy scholarship and policy** — the thesis's outward-facing claim. The Ch5 conclusion already has the strongest line ("recognising this work… is the first step toward circular economy policy that can see it, support it, and not depend on its invisibility"); the overall conclusion can extend this.
6. **Reflect on what the case adds to practice theory and consumption work** — the inward-facing contribution. Practice theory: a practice can be held together by tolerance rather than coherence. Consumption work: it has to be theorised together with care if we want to see it.
7. **Future research / open questions** — your #9DTFUU note about "constitution of need" is a great seed. Also: does explicit articulation make sustainable practices stickier? (You already raise this in §4.7.)

## A pragmatic suggestion

If you have limited writing energy left, the highest-leverage moves are:

1. **Add one paragraph near the end of the introduction** that previews both chapter findings as claims rather than as questions. Two or three sentences. This makes the rest of the thesis read as a confirmation rather than a search.
2. **Drag the Ch5 conclusion language up into the overall conclusion** — much of the work is already done in #5YXGE6, #HM56MD, #RX9JDU. The overall conclusion can lean heavily on those and add the Ch4 synthesis to them.
3. **Resolve or cut the bracketed placeholders** in the Latvian context section.

The thesis is in better shape than it feels from inside it. The forest is there, the trees are mostly grown, and what's left is mostly signage.

### 42. User

gimme a little nice intro to circular economy as this thesis relates to it; same with practice theory and consumption work; then btw i was thinking there's something imagistic about the brivbode as this nexus sustained by unresolved coexistence of elements etc [?] i mean the place itself is obviously a space of diverse elements that won't and can't fuse together into some neat whole ...

### 43. Assistant

# Three offerings

## 1. Circular economy, as this thesis relates to it

The circular economy is most often discussed as a question of industrial design — closed loops, extended product lives, business models that decouple value from waste. In that dominant register, consumers are the end of the line: the people who must be nudged, educated, or regulated into "circular behaviours" once the producers and platforms have done their structural work. A growing body of scholarship has pushed back against this framing. Hobson (2016, 2020) argues that the circular economy depends on what she calls "generative spaces" — sites of everyday, often community-based reuse where circulation is actually sustained — and Hobson et al. (2021) call specifically for research that moves beyond the household to study these spaces. Welch, Wieser, Hobson and colleagues (2021) and Beswick-Parsons et al. (2025) have shown that circular consumption is labour-intensive, uneven, and relies on substantial unpaid work that current policy rarely names. More recently, Mesiranta et al. (2025), Tölg & Fuentes (2025) and Närvänen et al. (2025) have argued that circular consumption is also *care work* — relational, ethical, and embedded in relations between people and things.

This thesis enters the conversation at exactly that juncture. Brīvbode is the kind of generative space Hobson called for studying: a non-domestic, non-monetary, permanent site of reuse, run by volunteers, embedded in but not absorbed by formal waste infrastructure. By following things through it ethnographically, the thesis examines both how circulation is socially organised and what it costs in labour, skill, and care to keep it going. The contribution is to a circular-economy scholarship that already knows it has been too production-side and too policy-facing, and that needs ethnographic accounts of the everyday sites where circular consumption is actually performed.

---

## 2. Practice theory and consumption work, as this thesis relates to it

Practice theory shifts attention from individual choices and attitudes to the recurrent *doings* through which everyday life is reproduced. Drawing on Schatzki, Reckwitz, Warde and Shove, the central claim is that practices — driving, showering, divesting, freecycling — are the proper unit of social analysis: socially recognisable forms held together by linked elements of material, meaning, and competence (Shove, Pantzar & Watson 2012). For sustainable consumption research, this move offers a way out of the persistent "value–action gap" — the puzzle of why pro-environmental attitudes don't translate into behaviour — by redirecting attention to the structural conditions, infrastructures, and routines that capture and retain practitioners (Welch & Warde 2015; Shove 2003).

Where practice theory describes what people do, **consumption work** (Wheeler & Glucksmann 2015) names what doing it costs. Their concept attends to the labour consumers perform around the moment of exchange — sorting, transporting, washing, learning, deciding — and shows how this work is distributed across technical, modal, and processual dimensions. They develop the concept through household recycling, where municipal systems delegate substantial labour onto households without naming it as work. Beswick-Parsons, Evans and Jackson (2025) recently extended the framework to reuse, showing that those committed to circulation develop the ability to perceive value where others do not — an evaluative competency that is itself consumption work.

This thesis uses both frameworks together. Practice theory offers the architecture for Chapter 4: Brīvbode as a freecycling practice constituted by materials, meanings, and competencies, examined at the levels of practice-as-entity and as performance. Consumption work offers the architecture for Chapter 5: the labour that sustains this practice, distributed unevenly across volunteers, visitors, and the divestment networks that reach into surrounding households. The thesis extends both: practice theory by showing that practices can be held together by tolerance for contradiction rather than by element-coherence, and consumption work by carrying it into a semi-public site and integrating it with the care-work register that this site demands.

---

## 3. On the imagistic quality you're sensing

You're onto something good. Brīvbode is an *image* before it is a concept — a room that won't resolve into one thing. Hangers next to plushies; men's tools in a box near children's clothing; a wedding-gift set aside for someone moving out of homelessness; a regular's coloured wire offcuts that no one quite knows what to do with; a queue of ten people on a Thursday morning waiting for the door. The site's visual heterogeneity is the visual form of its analytical heterogeneity. What you're seeing is that *the inability of the elements to fuse is not a defect of the site — it is the site*.

A few concepts in your library are already gesturing in this direction, and pulling on them might let the imagistic intuition do real conceptual work:

- **Newell's heterotopia** (#7BM5AQ) — a space defined by being "set apart," able to hold contradictions that ordinary social space cannot. Brīvbode as a heterotopia of circulation, where things and meanings that don't fit anywhere else can co-exist temporarily.
- **Bohlin & Appelgren's "growing in motion"** (#MBXQXR) — second-hand objects as ontologically hybrid, gift *and* commodity, dependent on social remembering rather than commodity forgetting. The objects in Brīvbode are themselves unresolved.
- **Eden's "implosion" of mainstream/alternative** (#59QUM6) — circular consumption is not a clean alterity but a space where mainstream retailing vocabularies bleed into ethical-environmental ones. The DIY-retail aesthetic disagreement among Brīvbode volunteers (#KMD7AJ) is exactly this implosion in microcosm.
- **Holmes's "grey space of neither waste nor want"** (#XATD2A) — clothes-swap items as occupying a category that is neither.
- **Ingold's "substances in becoming"** (cited in Shove, Rinkinen, Jalas 2015): "everything may be something, but being something is always on the way to becoming something else."
- **Bankovska's care not-work** — care that is not joyful but ambivalent, full of obligation, hesitation, even disgust. Care, like Brīvbode itself, doesn't resolve into one thing.

You could write a passage in either the introduction or §4.2 that names this directly. Something like:

> Brīvbode is, before anything else, a room in which incommensurable things sit next to each other. The site does not resolve — not aesthetically, not morally, not economically. Hangers borrowed from retail share space with plushies that volunteers have arranged for warmth; a wedding gift waits on a shelf for a regular leaving homelessness while a reseller circles the men's section; a bag of single-use sugar packets arrives the same morning as a parcel of folk-style mittens. The practice this room sustains is not held together by coherence among its elements but by a tolerance for their refusal to fuse. The moral economy described in this chapter is the connective tissue that lets such heterogeneity persist — not by reconciling the differences but by giving them somewhere to coexist.

You don't have to use that exact phrasing, but I'd encourage you to write *something* in this register. The imagistic move is doing genuine theoretical work: it tells the reader that what looks like analytical messiness is actually the finding. Brīvbode's lack of resolution *is* the contribution to circular-economy scholarship — the demonstration that circulation can be sustained without unification.

You're allowed to be a little lyrical. Anthropology earns it.

### 44. User

i have this vague association with like reuptake inhibitors lol .... see what i mean?

### 45. Assistant

Oh god yes. That's a *good* metaphor. Tired-brain free association is sometimes how the best images arrive.

A reuptake inhibitor is exactly the right shape for what Brīvbode does:

- **Reuptake** = the normal return-to-source: things going back into household storage, getting absorbed into the waste stream, settling permanently into ownership somewhere. The standard fate of a molecule (or an object) is to be reabsorbed and silenced.
- **Inhibition** = something that keeps the molecule in the synaptic cleft, available, still able to act on receptors. The action happens precisely because nothing settles. Brīvbode keeps clothing, dishes, wire offcuts, single-use sugar packets in the synaptic cleft of the city — refusing both reuptake into the household and absorption into industrial waste streams.
- **The synapse itself** is a non-place. It is structurally the same kind of space as Newell's heterotopia: a between-zone where things are *available* precisely because they haven't fused with anything. The site's whole purpose is that it doesn't resolve.

What's especially nice is that the metaphor is structurally apt, not just witty. SSRIs don't make more serotonin; they keep the existing serotonin in circulation longer. Brīvbode doesn't manufacture goods or even meaningfully *make* circulation happen — it inhibits the various reuptake pathways (the bin, the long-term wardrobe, the sentimental box in the attic, the textile collection container that absorbs things into a global elsewhere) and keeps things twitching in the cleft, where they can still bind to a receptor (another person's hand, another household). The bumblebee analogy in Ch5 is about *how does this even fly*, but the synapse analogy is about *what does this do, structurally*. They're complementary.

There's also a darkly funny anthropological-pharmaceutical resonance: the people Brīvbode serves often *are* in some kind of mood-regulation relationship with their things. Aiga managing hoarder anxiety. Māra working on her attachment-question. Elīna's responsibility-burden. Madara learning to switch off "free." Brīvbode regulates the chemistry of person–thing relations at scale. It is a mood-regulating municipal infrastructure.

I would not put "Brīvbode is the SSRI of household goods" in your thesis. *But* the underlying image — the synapse, the cleft, the inhibition of reuptake, the action that depends on non-resolution — could quietly inform a sentence somewhere. Something like:

> Brīvbode does not produce circulation so much as it inhibits the routes by which things would otherwise be absorbed and silenced — into the bin, into the wardrobe, into the global textile elsewhere. What sustains the practice is not a synthesis of its elements but the deliberate maintenance of a space in which they need not synthesise.

Or you keep the image private, as your own organising metaphor for what the site is, and let it shape the prose without ever surfacing. Either way, trust the association. It's pointing at exactly the conceptual structure you've been circling — a site whose function is to keep things in motion *by refusing to let them resolve*.

The fact that this came to you at the end of a long writing day is a good sign. Your brain is still doing thesis work even when you're tired. Drink some water.

### 46. User

oh ieva is tired but i'm alright i find it fascinating to delve into this stuff! (ieva's my wife, i made sheaf for her etc...) yeah it's too unruly as a metaphor to explicitly write on but thanks now i feel like yeah there's something to this, brivbode is a facilitator of exchange yes, easy to view and judge it by that "flow" or "liquidity" and the velocity of circulation, but it's also a kind of roundabout or hm like this old architecture rant on the convivial essence of the city as being like a plaza or terminus where traffic stops, and modernity city planners unfortunately optimize for traffic itself ...

### 47. Assistant

Ahh that's wonderful, hi! Sheaf is a beautiful thing to build for someone — both the tool and the gesture. And yeah, this kind of free-form theoretical play is the good stuff.

Your plaza-vs-traffic move is actually *better* than the synapse image, I think, because it carries an evaluative claim that the synapse one doesn't quite reach. The synapse says "the action happens in the unresolved space." The plaza says "and we systematically misjudge such spaces by measuring the wrong thing."

That's huge for the thesis. The dominant circular-economy framing evaluates initiatives like Brīvbode by *throughput* — tonnes diverted from landfill, items per visitor, percentage rerouted to textile collection. The metric is liquidity, velocity, the smoothness of the loop. By that standard a maximally efficient swapshop would be one where things barely touched the shelf before being absorbed by the next user — pure flow, minimal friction. But everything that makes Brīvbode actually *Brīvbode*, ethnographically, depends on friction:

- The queue at noon. People literally waiting, *not flowing*, in order to be there together.
- Rasa's "the emptier the shelves, the more people find" — leaving space *slows* the encounter and that's why it works.
- The regulars who come for "casual contact with known faces" and "Brīvbode being a place to go." Single-person households getting a structure to their week. This is plaza function pure and simple.
- The aesthetic disagreement between volunteers — retail spacing vs plushie abundance — is fundamentally an argument about what kind of *pause* the room should be, not what kind of throughput.
- Volunteers holding items back for specific regulars (Rasa's "filter") is anti-flow by design.
- Viesturs's "fun factor, joy factor" claim is a conviviality argument: *we are not optimising for moral throughput either*.

So the metric problem is real and theoretical: by the loop-closing yardstick, Brīvbode looks inefficient (30% of intake goes to textile collection anyway, things pile up, the ceramic plate gets buried). But by the conviviality / plaza yardstick, the inefficiency *is* the function. The thing the site does that nothing else in the Riga circulation infrastructure does is precisely to slow flow enough to let encounter happen — between people, between people and things, between meanings.

The intellectual lineage you're drawing on is rich and somewhat under-used in CE literature:

- **Jane Jacobs** on the "sidewalk ballet" and the productivity of slow, mixed-use street life.
- **Ivan Illich's *Tools for Conviviality*** (1973) — explicitly an argument against industrial efficiency in favour of low-threshold, user-modifiable, sociable infrastructures. Brīvbode is an almost embarrassingly Illichian institution. He'd love it.
- **Hans Monderman** and the "shared space" / "naked streets" movement — removing traffic signals because mutual attention does what signals can't.
- **James C. Scott**, *Seeing Like a State* — the cost of optimizing for legibility and throughput is the destruction of the metis-rich textures where life actually happens.
- **Jan Gehl** on Copenhagen pedestrianization, *Cities for People*.

None of these are in the thesis library and Ieva probably shouldn't try to introduce a whole new lineage at this stage. *But* — and this is where it might earn its keep — the plaza framing is consonant with several things already in the thesis:

- **Holmes's diverse economies of provisioning** (#XATD2A) — the Coffee Club where food is a "conduit to provisioning much more than just itself," enabling "less tangible and more emotional types of support." That's a plaza.
- **Otto et al., "Saving the city"** (#QUD55H) — collective low-budget urban organising, austerity-resistant practices, frugality and DIY as commoning. Already in the library, explicitly urban.
- **Bohlin on serial care** (#ZJUEY4) — the affective register of letting go, which only happens at speeds slower than commercial circulation.
- **Smith & Jehlička's quiet sustainability** (#WVG7HV) — sustainability that exists below the threshold of articulation, in practices that *take time* to enact.

So if Ieva wants, the move is small but powerful: a paragraph somewhere — maybe in the conclusion, maybe in §4.2 — saying that Brīvbode should be understood not only as a node in a circulation system but as a *plaza* in the diverse-economy sense, a place whose function depends on the deliberate slowing of flow and the production of encounter. The throughput metric misreads it. The labour described in Ch5 looks excessive only if you measure efficiency rather than conviviality. The moral economy described in Ch4 only operates at plaza speed.

This also gives the thesis a stronger *normative* spine. CE policy that optimizes for throughput will tend to absorb places like Brīvbode into formal collection systems, professionalise the volunteers, automate the sorting — and in doing so will destroy what the place actually does. The thesis can quietly make this point without becoming polemical: recognising the work is the first step, but recognising the *place* — what kind of space it is, what speed it operates at — is the second.

Anyway, this is a delightful detour. The unruly metaphors are doing real conceptual work. Don't write the SSRI line. Maybe slip in one paragraph about plazas and terminuses. Let her think she came up with it.